Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 95–110 | Cite as

Researching the use of force: the background to the international project

  • Philip Stenning
  • Christopher Birkbeck
  • Otto Adang
  • David Baker
  • Thomas Feltes
  • Luis Gerardo Gabaldón
  • Maki Haberfeld
  • Eduardo Paes Machado
  • P. A. J. Waddington
Article

Abstract

This article provides the background to an international project on use of force by the police that was carried out in seven countries. Force is often considered to be the defining characteristic of policing and much research has been conducted on the determinants, prevalence and control of the use of force, particularly in the United States. However, little work has looked at police officers’ own views on the use of force, in particular the way in which they justify it. Using a hypothetical encounter developed for this project, researchers in each country conducted focus groups with police officers in which they were encouraged to talk about the use of force. The results show interesting similarities and differences across countries and demonstrate the value of using this kind of research focus and methodology.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, K., Alpert, G., Dunham, R., Garner, J., Greenfield, L., Henriquez, M., et al. (1999). Use of force by police: overview of national and local data. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice/National Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adang, O. (1998). Hooligans, autonomen, agenten. Geweld en politie-optreden in relsituaties. Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adang, O., & Mensink, J. (2004). Pepper spray: an unreasonable response to suspect verbal resistance. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 27(2), 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adang, O., Kaminski, R., Howell, M., & Mensink, J. (2006). Assessing the performance of pepper spray in use-of-force encounters: the Dutch experience. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 29(2), 282–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adang, O., Kop, N., Ferwerda, H., Heijnemans, J., Olde Nordkamp,W., et al. (2006). Omgaan met conflictsituaties: op zoek naar goede werkwijzen bij de Politie. Politie en Wetenschap nr 30. Uitgeverij Kerkebosch, ZeistGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alpert, G., & Dunham, R. (2004). Understanding police use of force: officers, suspects, reciprocity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alpert, G., & Fridell, L. (1992). Police vehicles and firearms: instruments of deadly force. Prospect Heights: Waveland.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alpert, G., & Smith, W. (1994). How reasonable is the reasonable man? Police and excessive force. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 85, 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Amendola, K. (1996). Officer behaviour in police–citizen encounters: a descriptive model and implications for less-than-lethal alternatives. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Amnesty International. (2004). Erneut im Fokus: Vorwürfe über polizeiliche Misshandlungen und den Einsatz unverhältnismäßiger Gewalt in Deutschland. Bonn: Amnesty International, Sektion der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Birkbeck, C., & Gabaldón, L. (1996). Avoiding complaints: Venezuelan police officers’ situational criteria for the use of force against citizens. Policing and Society, 6, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Birkbeck, C., & Gabaldón, L. (1998). The effect of citizen’s status and behaviour on Venezuelan police officers’ decisions to use force. Policing and Society, 8(4), 315–338.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bittner, E. (1974). Florence Nightingale in pursuit of Willie Sutton: a theory of the police. In H. Jacob (Ed.), The potential for reform of criminal justice. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bittner, E. (1970). The functions of the police in modern society. Chevy Chase: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Briceño León, R., Carneiro, L., & Cruz, J. (1997). El apoyo ciudadano a la action extrajudicial de la policía en Brasil, El Salvador y Venezuela. Realidad, 60, 603–614.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brodeur, J.-P. (2003). Les visages de la police: pratiques et perceptions. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brusten, M. (ed.) (1975). Die Pollizei—eine Institution öffentlicher Gewalt: Analysen, Kritik, empirische Daten. Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Burkeman, O. (2006). Chicago police ‘tortured black suspects’. The Guardian, 21st July, 2007, p. 19.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cano, I. (2001). Policía paramilitares y escuadrones de la muerte en América Latina. In K. Bodemer, S. Kurtenbach, & K. Meschkat (Eds.), Violencia y regulación de conflictos en América Latina (pp. 219–235). Caracas: Nueva Sociedad.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    CELS (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales). (1998). La inseguridad policial: violencia de las fuerzas de suguridad en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chappell, D., & Graham, L. (1985). Police use of deadly force: Canadian perspectives. Toronto: Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Coady, C. A. J. (1986). The idea of violence. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 3(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coady, T., James, S., Miller, S., & O’Keefe, M. (eds.) (2000). Violence and Police Culture. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Del Olmo, R. (1990). Violencia policial en las calles de Caracas. In R. Del Olmo (Ed.), Segunda ruptura criminològica (pp. 217–239). Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R. D., Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39(1), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ericson, R. (1981). Making crime: a study of detective work. Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Falk, E. (2000). Widerstand gegen Vollstreckungsbeamte: Ein praxisbesogenes Forschungsprojekt [Texte der Fachhochschule Villingen-Schwenningen, Hochschule für Polizei, Band 25. Villingen-Schwenningen: Fachhochschule Villingen-Schwenningen, Hochschule für Polizei.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fernando, B., & Puvimanasinghe, S. (eds.) (2005). An X-ray of the Sri Lankan policing system & torture of the poor. Kowloon: Asian Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fyfe, J., & Skolnick, J. (1993). Above the law: police and the excessive use of force. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gabaldón, L. (1993). Police violence and uncertainty in Latin America: linking the macro and micro levels of analysis. International Criminal Justice Review, 3, 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gabaldón, L. & Birkbeck, C. (eds.) (2003). Policía y fuerza física en perspective intercultural. Caracas: Nueva Sociedad.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Garner, J., Maxwell, C., & Heraux, C. (2002). Characteristics associated with the prevalence and severity of force used by the police. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 705–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Geller, W., & Scott, M. (1992). Deadly force: what we know. A practitioner’s desk reference. Washington, D.C.: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Geller, W., & Toch, H. (eds.) (1996). Police Violence. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Herrnkind, M., & Scheerer, S. (eds.) (2003). Die Polizei als Organisation mit Gewaltlizenz. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Kontrolle. Münster: Hamburger Studien zur Kriminologie und Kriminalpolitik, Band 31.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hickman, M. (2006). Citizen complaints about police use of force. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, June 2006. Washington: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hoffman, P., & Hickey, E. (2005). Use of force by female police officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(2), 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Huggins, M. (1991). Vigilantism and the state in modern Latin America: essays on extralegal violence. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Huggins, M., & Mesquita, M. (1995). Scapegoating outsiders: the murders of street youth in modern Brazil. Policing and Society, 5(4), 265–280.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jäger, J. (1985). Angriffe auf Polizeibeamte 1983. Münster: Polizei-Fürungsakademie.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jäger, J. (1989). Angriffe auf Polizeibeamte 1987. Münster: Polizei-Fürungsakademie.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jäger, J. (1994). Angriffe auf Polizeibeamte 1992. Münster: Polizei-Fürungsakademie.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jäger, J. (1988). Gewalt und Polizei: Theoretisch-empirische Beiträge zur Kriminologie des Widerstandes gegen Vollstreckungsbeamte und zur Konfliktforschung [Beiträge zur gesellschaftswissen-schaftlichen Forschung, Band 6]. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus-Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jobard, F. (1999). Les Violences Policières: État des recherches dans les pays anglo-saxons. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kleinig, J. (1996). The ethics of policing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Klockars, C. (1995). A theory of excessive force and its control. In W. Geller, & H. Toch (Eds.), And justice for all: understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. 11–29). Washington, D.C.: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Klockars, C. (1980). The Dirty Harry Problem. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Klockars, C. (1985). The idea of police. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kop, N., Spaan, R. B., & Driessen, F. (1997). Politie en publiek: een onderzoek naar de interactie politie-publiek tijdens de surveillancedienst. Politiestudies 19. Deventer: Gouda Quint.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lange, H. - J. (2003). Die Polizei der Gesellschaft. Zur Sociologie der Inneren Sicherheit. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lawrence, R. (2000). The politics of force: media and the construction of police brutality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Loader, I. (1997). Policing the social: questions of symbolic power. British Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    MacDonald, J., Manz, P., Alpert, G., & Dunham, R. (2003). Police use of force: examining the relationship between calls for service and the balance of police force and suspect resistance. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(2), 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Manzoni, P. (2003). Gewalt zwischen Polizei und Bevölkerung. Einflüsse von Arbeits-belastungen, Arbeitszufriedenheit und Burnout auf polizeiliche Gewaltausübung und Opfererfahrungen. Zürich: Rüegger.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mars, J. (2003). Deadly force, colonialism and the rule of law: police violence in Guyana. Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    McElvain, J., & Kposowa, A. (2004). Police officer characteristics and internal affairs investigations for use of force allegations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(3), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Monsalve, Y. (2005). Control social y castigo: percepción en funcionarios policiales venezolanos. Capítulo Criminològico, 33(1), 7–30.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mopas, M., & Stenning, P. (2001). Tools of the trade: the symbolic power of private security an exploratory study. Policing and Society, 11(1), 67–97.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Naeyé, J. (2005). Niet zonder slag of stoot. De geweldsbevioegdheid en doorzettingskracht van de Nederlandse politie. Uitgeverij Kerckebosch, Zeist.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Neyroud, P., & Beckley, A. (2001). Policing, ethics and human rights. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Norris, M., Birkbeck, C., & Gabaldón, L. G. (2006). Social geometry and force: a partial test of Black’s theory of law with Mexican, U.S. and Venezuelan police. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 22(4), 324–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ohlemacher, T. (2003). Gewalt gegen Polizeibeamtinnen und -beamte 1985–2000: Eine kriminologische Analyse [Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zur kriminologischen Forschung]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Queensland (Australia), Criminal Justice Commission. (2000). Reported use of force by Queensland police. Research Paper Series 6(2). Brisbane: Queensland Criminal Justice Commision.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rahtz, H. (2003). Understanding police use of force. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Reiss, A. (1968). Police brutality—answers to key questions. Transaction, 5(8), 10–19.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Reiss, A. (1971). The police and the public. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ross, J. (2000). Making news of police violence: a comparative study of Toronto and New York City. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rossiter, L., & MacLennan, R. (2003). Validation of a model for use-of-force decision-making using live scenarios. Canadian Journal of Poli8ce & Security Services, 1(1), 41–52.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Santos, T. (1992). Violencia criminal y violencia policial en Venezuela; signos de una frustrada modernizaciòn. Maracaibo: Instituto de Criminología, Universidad del Zulia.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Schuck, A. (2004). The masking of racial and ethnic disparity in police use of physical force: the effects of gender and custody status. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 557–564.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sessar, K., Baumann, U., & Müller, J. (1980). Polizeibeamte als Opfer vorsätzlicher Tötung [BKA-Forschungsreihe, Band 12]. Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Shuldiner, P. (1979). Visual rape: a look at the dubious legality of strip searches. J. Marshall Law Review, 13, 273.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Smith, B., & Holmes, M. (2003). Community accountability, minority threat, and police brutality: an examination of civil rights criminal complaints. Criminology, 41(4), 1035–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Stenning, P. (1994). Police use of force and violence against members of visible minority groups in Canada. Ottawa: Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Stewart, D., Shamdasani, P., & Rook, D. (2007). Focus groups: theory and practice, 2nd ed. [Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 20]. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Straus, M., & Gelles, R. (1990). How violent are American families? Estimates from the National Family Violence Survey and other studies. In M. Straus, & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Terrill, W. (2003). Police use of force and suspect resistance: the micro-process of the police–suspect encounter. Police Quarterly, 6, 51–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Terrill, W., Paoline III, E., & Manning, P. (2003). Police culture and coercion. Criminology, 41(4), 1003–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Timmer, J. (2005). Politiegeweld. Geweldgebruik van en tegen de politie in Nederland. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Timmer, J., Naeyé, J., & van der Steeg, M. (1996). Onder Schot Vuurwapengebruik van de politie in Nederland. Deventer: Gouda Quint.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Uildriks, N. (1997). De normering en beheersing van politiegeweld. Deventer: Gouda Quint.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Uildriks, N. (1996). Geweld in de interactie politie-publiek. Een onderzoek naar opvattingen en ervaringen binnen de politie. Deventer: Gouda Quint.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    United Nations General Assembly. (1979a). Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials—endorsed by General Assembly Resolution 45/166 of 18th December, 1979—accessible at: http://www.uncjin.org/Standards/Conduct/compendium.pdf (“D. The judiciary and Law Enforcement”.
  85. 85.
    United Nations General Assembly. (1979b). Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials—adopted by General Assembly Resolution 34/169 of 17th December, 1979 accessible at: http://www.uncjin.org/Standards/Conduct/compendium.pdf (“D. The judiciary and Law Enforcement”.
  86. 86.
    Urban Alliance on Race Relations/Queen Street Patients Council. (2000). Saving lives: alternatives to the use of lethal force by police. Toronto: Urban Alliance on Race Relations.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Waddington, P. (1991). The strong arm of the law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Weisburd, D., Greenspan, R., Hamilton, E., Bryant, K., & Williams, H. (2001). Abuse of police authority. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Westley, W. (1970). Violence and the police. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Wilson, J. (1968). Varieties of police behavior. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Stenning
    • 1
  • Christopher Birkbeck
    • 2
  • Otto Adang
    • 3
    • 4
  • David Baker
    • 5
  • Thomas Feltes
    • 6
  • Luis Gerardo Gabaldón
    • 7
  • Maki Haberfeld
    • 8
  • Eduardo Paes Machado
    • 9
  • P. A. J. Waddington
    • 10
  1. 1.School of Sociology & CriminologyKeele UniversityKeeleUK
  2. 2.School of English, Sociology, Politics and Contemporary HistoryUniversity of SalfordSalfordUK
  3. 3.Netherlands Police AcademyApeldoornNetherlands
  4. 4.ApeldoornNetherlands
  5. 5.Criminal Justice, School of Humanities, Communications and Social SciencesMonash UniversityChurchillAustralia
  6. 6.Criminology, Criminal Justice Policy and Police ScienceRuhr-University BochumBochumGermany
  7. 7.Instituto de Investigaciones JurídicasUniversidad Católica Andrés BelloCaracasVenezuela
  8. 8.John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY)New YorkUSA
  9. 9.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências HumanasUniversidade Federal da BahíaSalvadorBrazil
  10. 10.History and Governance Research InstituteUniversity of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK

Personalised recommendations