Advertisement

Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 111–138 | Cite as

Singing the same tune? International continuities and discontinuities in how police talk about using force

  • P. A. J. Waddington
  • Otto Adang
  • David Baker
  • Christopher Birkbeck
  • Thomas Feltes
  • Luis Gerardo Gabaldón
  • Eduardo Paes Machado
  • Philip Stenning
Article

Abstract

This article focuses on a research project conducted in six jurisdictions: England, The Netherlands, Germany, Australia, Venezuela, and Brazil. These societies are very different ethnically, socially, politically, economically, historically and have wildly different levels of crime. Their policing arrangements also differ significantly: how they are organised; how their officers are equipped and trained; what routine operating procedures they employ; whether they are armed; and much else besides. Most relevant for this research, they represent policing systems with wildly different levels of police shootings, Police in the two Latin American countries represented here have a justified reputation for the frequency with which they shoot people, whereas at the other extreme the police in England do not routinely carry firearms and rarely shoot anyone. To probe whether these differences are reflected in the way that officers talk about the use of force, police officers in these different jurisdictions were invited to discuss in focus groups a scenario in which police are thwarted in their attempt to arrest two youths (one of whom is a known local criminal) by the youths driving off with the police in pursuit, and concludes with the youths crashing their car and escaping in apparent possession of a gun, It might be expected that focus groups would prove starkly different, and indeed they were, but not in the way that might be expected. There was little difference in affirmation of normative and legal standards regarding the use of force. It was in how officers in different jurisdictions envisaged the circumstances in which the scenario took place that led Latin American officers to anticipate that they would shoot the suspects, whereas officers in the other jurisdictions had little expectation that they would open fire in the conditions as they imagined them to be.

Keywords

Focus Group Police Officer Police Force Innocent Bystander Police Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, K. (1996). Measuring the prevalence of police abuse of force. In W. A. Geller, & H. Toch (Eds.), Police violence: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. 52–93). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams, K. (1999). What we know about police use of force. Report to the National Institute of Justice: Use of force by police: Overview of national and local data. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Travis, J., Chaiken, J. M., & Kaminski, R. J. (1999). Use of force by police: Overview of national and local data. Washington, DC.: National Institute of Justice and Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chevigny, P. (1995). Edge of the knife: Police violence in the Americas (p. 319). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Terrill, W., Paoline, E. A., & Manning, P. K. (2003). Police culture and coercion. Criminology, 41(4), 1003–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reiner, R. (2000). The politics of the police (p. 279, 3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O'Connor, D. (2005). Closing the gap: a review of the 'fitness for purpose' of the current structure of policing in England & Wales. London: HM Inspectorate of Constabulary.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hough, M. (2007). Policing London, 20 years on. In A. Henry, & D. J. Smith (Eds.), Transformations of policing (pp. 191–212). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blakey, D., & Crompton, D. (2000). 'Winning Consent': A review of murder investigation and community and race relations issues in the metropolitan police service. London: Her Majesty's Inspector of Constabulary.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McLaughlin, E. (2006). The new policing. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Waddington, P. A. J., & Wright, M. (2008). Police use of force, firearms and riot-control. In T. Newburn (Ed.), Handbook of policing. Willan: Collumpton.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rico, J. M. (1997). Justicia Penal y Transición Democrática en América Latina. Mexico: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gabaldón, L., & C. Birkbeck (Eds.) (2003). Policía y Fuerza Física en Perspectiva Intercultural. Nueva Sociedad: Caracas.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Briceño-León, R. et al. (2002). Tiene la Policía Derecho a Matar a los Delincuentes? Un Estudio de Apoyo Ciudadano a la Violencia Policial. In R. Briceño-León and R. Pérez-Perdomo (Eds.), Morir en Caracas (p. 179–192). Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Terrill, W., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2002). Situational and officer-based determinants of police coercion. Justice Quarterly, 19(2), 215–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Toch, H. (1996). The violence-prone officer. In W. A. Geller, & H. Toch (Eds.), Police violence: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. 94–112). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Christopher, W. C. (1991). Report of the Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lester, D. (1996). Officer attitudes toward police use of force. In W. A. Geller, & H. Torch (Eds.), Police violence: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. 180–190). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grant, J. D., & Grant, J. (1996). Officer selection and the prevention of abuse of force. In W. A. Geller, & H. Toch (Eds.), Police violence: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. 150–164). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shepherd, E., & Walsh, T. (1986). Selection and training of authorised firearms officers, Report on a pilot study. City of London: Applied Psychology Unit.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mirrlees-Black, C. (1992). Using psychometric personality tests in the selection of firearms officers. Research and Planning Unit Papers. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shepherd, E., & Walsh, T. (1987) Identifying the 'at risk' armed officer.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jones, S. (1986). Policewomen and equality: Formal police v informal practice? (p. 235). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Braithwaite, H., & Brewer, N. (1998). Differences in the conflict resolution tactics of male and female police patrol officers. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 1(3), 276–287.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shockley-Zalabak, P. (1984). Sex differences in conflict style preferences. Communications Research Reports, 1, 28–32.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bloch, P. B., & Anderson, D. (1974). Policewomen on patrol: Final report. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ffrench, M., & Waugh, L. (1998). The weaker sex? Women and police work. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 1(3), 260–275.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sherman, L. W. (1975). An evaluation of policewomen on patrol in a suburban police department. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 3, 434–438.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Grennan, S. A. (1987). Findings on the role of officer gender in violent encounters with citizens. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15, 78–85.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Adams, K. (1999). What we know about police use of force. In J. Travis, J.M. Chaiken, & R.J. Kaminski (Eds.), Use of force by police: Overview of national and local data (pp. 1–14). Washington, DC.: National Institute of Justice and Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Walker, S. (1977). A critical history of police reform: The emergence of professionalization. Lexington: Lexington.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Milton, C. H., et al. (1977). Police use of deadly force. Washington, D.C.: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jakubs, D. L. (1977). Police violence in times of political tension: The case of Brazil, 1968–71. In D. H. Bayley (Ed.), Police and Society (pp. 85–106). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chan, J. B. L. (1997). Changing police culture: Policing in a multicultural society (p. 255). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Berkeley, G. E. (1969). The democratic policeman. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Skolnick, J. H., & Fyfe, J. J. (1993). Above the law: Police and the excessive use of force (p. 313). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kraska, P. B., & Kappeler, V. E. (1997). Militarizing American police: The rise and normalization of paramilitary units. Social Problems, 44(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Williams, J. J., & Westall, D. (2003). SWAT and non-SWAT police officers and the use of force. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(5), 469–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Locke, H. G. (1996). The color of law and the issue of color: race and the abuse of police power. In W. A. Geller, & H. Toch (Eds.), Police violence: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. 129–149). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Geller, W., & Karales, K. (1981). Split second decisions: Shootings of and by Chicago Police. Chicago: Chicago Law Enforcement Study Group.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Geller, W. A., & Toch, H. (1996). Police violence: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (p. 379). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Matulia, K. (1981). Justifiable homicide by the police: A study of homicide by the police in 57 US cities. Gaithersburg: International Association of Chiefs of Police.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Friedrich, R. J. (1980). Police use of force: individuals, situations and organizations. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452, 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kobler, A. L. (1975). Figures (and perhaps some facts) on police killings of civilians in the United States, 1965–1969. Journal of Social Issues, 31(1), 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Meyer, M. W. (1980). Police shootings at minorities: the case of Los Angeles. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452, 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fyfe, J. J. (1982). Race and extreme police–citizen violence. In J. J. Fyfe (Ed.), Readings on police use of deadly force (pp. 173–194). Washington: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mendez, G.A. (1983). The role of race and ethnicity in the incidence of police use of deadly force (p. 114–115). In Anon. (Ed.), Annual report. New York: National Urban League.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Brim, O. (1960). Personality development as role learning. In I. Iscoe, & H. Stevenson (Eds.), Personality development in children (pp. 127–159). Austin: Texas University Press.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sherman, L. W. (1980). Causes of police behaviour: the current state of quantitative research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 17, 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Alpert, G. P., & Dunham, R. G. (2004). Understanding police use of force: Officers, suspects, and reciprocity (p. 191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Worden, R. E. (1996). The causes of police brutality: theory and evidence on police use of force. In W. A. Geller, & H. Toch (Eds.), Police violence: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. 23–51). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bayley, D. H., & Garofalo, J. (1989). The management of violence by police patrol officers. Criminology, 27(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Liska, A. J. (1992). Social threat and social control (p. 240). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Liska, A. E., & Yu, J. (1992). Specifying and testing the threat hypothesis: Police use of deadly force. In A. J. Liska (Ed.), Social threat and social control (pp. 53–68). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    United Nations (1999). Global report on crime and justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Shearing, C. D., & Ericson, R. V. (1991). Culture as figurative action. British Journal of Sociology, 42(4), 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ericson, R. V. (2007). Rules in policing: Five perspectives. Theoretical Criminology, 11(3), 367–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Holdaway, S. (1983). Inside the British police. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Waddington, P. A. J. (1999). Police (canteen) sub-culture: An appreciation. British Journal of Criminology, 39(2), 286–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Brewer, J. D. (1990). Talking about danger: the RUC and the paramilitary threat. Sociology, 24(4), 657–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Fielding, N. (1994). Cop canteen culture. In T. Newburn, & E. Stanko (Eds.), Just boys doing business: Men, masculinity and crime (pp. 46–63). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Klockars, C. B. (1980). The dirty Harry problem. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Klockars, C. B., Kutnjak Ivkovich, S., & Haberfeld, M. R. (2004). The contours of police integrity (p. 305). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Chan, J. B. L. (2003). Fair cop: Learning the art of policing. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. A. J. Waddington
    • 1
  • Otto Adang
    • 2
    • 3
  • David Baker
    • 4
  • Christopher Birkbeck
    • 5
  • Thomas Feltes
    • 6
  • Luis Gerardo Gabaldón
    • 7
  • Eduardo Paes Machado
    • 8
  • Philip Stenning
    • 9
  1. 1.History and Governance Research InstituteUniversity of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK
  2. 2.Netherlands Police AcademyApeldoornNetherlands
  3. 3.ApeldoornNetherlands
  4. 4.School of Humanities, Communications and Social SciencesMonash UniversityChurchillAustralia
  5. 5.School of English, Sociology, Politics and Contemporary HistoryUniversity of SalfordSalfordUK
  6. 6.Criminal Justice Policy and Police ScienceRuhr-University BochumBochumGermany
  7. 7.Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, Universidad Católica Andrés BelloCaracasVenezuela
  8. 8.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências HumanasUniversidade Federal da BahíaSalvadorBrazil
  9. 9.School of Sociology and CriminologyKeele University KeeleStaffordshireUK

Personalised recommendations