Advertisement

Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 127–146 | Cite as

White collar crime, consumers and victimization

  • Hazel CroallEmail author
Article

Abstract

Consumers have long been recognized as one of the major groups of victims of white collar and corporate crime, although many of the activities which harm them are not widely regarded as ‘crime’. They tend to attract less publicity, and have been subject to less academic research, particularly in comparison with major financial frauds or cases involving mass harms. Moreover, there has been a tendency to view consumers as a relatively undifferentiated group, all of whom are likely to be victimized. This article identifies a wide range of crimes which affect consumers and explores some of the characteristics of victims and offenders, arguing that while all consumers are at risk, the impact of consumer crime, like other forms of crime, reflects wider patterns of structural inequality and falls most severely on the most disadvantaged.

Keywords

Genetically Modify White Collar Crime Corporate Crime Food Standard Agency Young Consumer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, L and Bannerman, L (2005) “Gas firm fined £15 million for the death of a family” The Herald 26 Aug. www.theherald.co.uk/news/45795 accessed 26/08/05.
  2. 2.
    Atkins and Sample (2004a) Women’s Environmental Network www.wen.org.uk.
  3. 3.
    Atkins, L and Sample, I (2004b) “Throw out the Bath Water? They look harmless enough, but your average baby care product contains a cocktail of chemicals that might surprise you” The Guardian 8 May, p.20.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aubert, V (1977) “White collar crime and social structure”, in G. Geis and R.F. Maier (eds) White Collar Crime: Offences in Business, Politics and the Professions - Classic and Contemporary Views. New York: Free Press, Collier and Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Automobile Association (1994) (in association with the Institute of Trading Standards Administration) Consumer Protection for Motorists: A Survey of Complaints and Proposals for Action. London: AA, June 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bannister, N (2000) “Byers targets rogue traders” Guardian Unlimited 2/12/2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barton, L and Branigan, T (2004) “Chemical World: LIP SERVICE: Makers of cosmetics and toiletries police the safety of their own products. That’s not good enough”, The Guardian 8th. May, p. 27.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beatty, S (2004) “FDA’s Crackdown Adds a Wrinkle to Marketing of Anti aging Skin Treatments” Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition).15 Mar., p. B.1.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Biswell, K (2004) “Consumers and standards: increasing influence,” 14 Consumer Policy Review 177–185.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blake, A (2004) “300,000 homeowners ‘ripped off’” Western Mail. Cardiff 23 Apr., p. 3.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boseley, S (2005) “Cosmetic injections may carry CJD risk” The Guardian 29 Jan., p.13.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burden, R (1998) Vulnerable consumer groups: quantification and analysis. Research Paper No. 15, prepared for the Office of Fair Trading, London: Office of Fair Trading.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Claybrook, J (1996) “Women in the Marketplace”, in E. Szockyj & J.G. Fox (eds) Corporate Victimisation of Women. Boston, Mass: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clinard, M & Yeager, P (1980) Corporate Crime New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Croall, H (1988) “Mistakes, accidents and someone else’s fault: the trading offender in court”, 15 Journal of Law and Society, 293–315.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Croall, H (1989) “Who is the White Collar Criminal?” 29 British Journal of Criminology 157–74.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Croall, H (1998) “Business, Crime and the Community”, 3 International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention 281–92.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Croall, H (1999) “Crime, Business and Community Safety”, 5 Scottish Journal of Criminal Justice Studies, 65–81.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Croall, H (1995) ‘Target Women: Women’s victimization from white collar crime’, in R. Dobash and L. Noaks (eds) Gender and Crime. Cardiff: Cardiff University Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Croall, H (2001a) Understanding White Collar Crime. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Croall, H (2001b) “The Victims of White Collar Crime” in Lindgren Sven-Ake (ed) White-Collar crime Research. Old Views and Future Potentials: Lectures and Papers from a Scandinavian Seminar National Council for Crime Prevention, Sweden Bra-Report 2001:1.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Croall, H (2004) “Cheated and Poisoned: Exposing the victims of economic crime” Report for Swedish Council of Crime Prevention (BRA) Stockholm.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Croall, H (2005) “Following the food chain of crime” unpublished paper delivered to the annual British Criminology Conference, University of Leeds, July.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Croall, H and Ross, J (2002) “Sentencing the Corporate Offender: Legal and Social Issues” in N. Hutton & C. Tata, Sentencing and Society Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Daily Mail (2005) ‘Health chiefs crack down on the cosmetic cowboys’ Daily Mail  Jan 29, 2005.  p. 13.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Department of Trade and Industry (2005) “Home Accidents involving product fault or contributory behaviour” www.dti.gov.uk/homesafetynetwork/gh_rsrch.htm accessed July 2005.
  27. 27.
    Department of Trade and Industry (2004) “Extending Competitive Markets: Empowered Consumers, Competitive Businesses” Consultation Paper London: Department of Trade and Industry, July.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Department of Trade and Industry (2003) “Comparative Report on Consumer Policy Regimes” London: Department of Trade and Industry, October.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Department of Trade and Industry (2001) “Consumer Knowledge Performance Monitor” Consumer Affairs report series No.4 London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Department of Trade and Industry (2002) “Car Servicing and Repairs: Mystery Shopping research” September, London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eleanor Hughes (1994) ‘Key note report, Cosmetics and Fragrances – A market sector overview 10th. Edition’ cited in WEN fact sheet on cosmetics available at www.wen.org.uk/cosmetics/facts.htm, accessed July 2005.
  32. 32.
    Fattah, E & Sacco, V (1989) Crime and Victimization of the Elderly. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Finlay, L (1996) “The Pharmaceutical Industry and Women’s Reproductive Health”, in E. Szockyj & J.G. Fox (eds) Corporate Victimisation of Women. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Foley, RJ (2003) “Consumer Complaints Soared in 2002” Wall Street Journal, November 25.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Foster, L (2004) “Moisturiser maketh the man: Consumer products groups are scrambling to cash in on a radical change in men’s attitudes to grooming” Financial Times, August 16.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fletcher, V (2003) “Hair dye alert as study reveals risks to health; Makers accused of insufficient testing” Evening Standard London 22 Apr., p. 15.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Geis, G & Edelhertz, H (1973) “Criminal Law and Consumer Fraud: a socio-legal view” 2 American Criminal Law Review, 989–1010.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gould, N (2005) “Ulster doctor warns of maverick cosmetics practitioners; Beware the Botox cowboys” Belfast Telegraph 14 Jun., p. 1.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hall, C (2005) “Health crackdown on beauty clinics and Botox parties” The Daily Telegraph 29 Jan., p. 05.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hayward, S (2003) “New Checks on Cowboy Clinics” Sunday Mirror London: Jul 13, p. 39.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Heath, A (2005) “Young victims of the mobile phone adverts” Coventry Evening Telegraph 4 Mar., p. 10.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kilbourne, J (1999) Deadly Persuasion cited on www.wen.org.uk/cosmetics/facts.htm accessed 27/07/05.
  43. 43.
    Laurance, J (2002) “1 in 10 plastic surgeons 'offer needless treatment” The Independent 8 Oct., p. 8.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lawrence, F (2004a) Not on the Label! What really goes into the Food on your Plate London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lawrence, F (2004b) ‘Supermarkets criticised over water in fresh pork’ The Guardian 16 July.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Levi, M (1999) The Impact of Fraud, Criminal Justice Matters, 36 (summer).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lindgren S (2002) “Economic crime in Sweden: An essentially contested Issue” 2 Criminal Justice, 363–383.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lister, S (2005a) ‘Secrets and lies of beauty industry laid bare by advertising watchdog’ The Times, 11 May.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lister, S (2005b) ‘Tighter facelift rules will tackle rogue practitioners’ The Times 28 Jan., p. 11.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mayo, E (2005) ‘Shopping Generation.’ London: National Consumer Council.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Millstone, E and Lang, T (2003) The Atlas of Food. Earthscan Books.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Morton, E (2004) “Aerosols ‘making tots sick’” The Sun 19 Oct., p. 18.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    National Consumer Council (2004) Car repairs and servicing: Key facts Fact Sheet, April. London: National Consumer Council.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    National Consumer Council (2005) “Putting food access on the radar: how to target and prioritise communities at risk” London: National Consumer Council.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    National Consumer Council (2003) “Everyday essentials: meeting basic needs. Research into accessing essential goods and services” London: National Consumer Council, Jan. 2003.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    National Consumer Council ‘Poor pay more’ information pack available on www.ncc.org.uk.
  57. 57.
    Nelken, D (2002) ‘White Collar Crime’ in Maguire, M., Morgan, R. & Reiner, R. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Office of Fair Trading (2004) Report on ‘Pressure Sales’, 12 May 2004 www.oft.gov.uk accessed September 2004.
  59. 59.
    Peake, A (2004) “Cowboy builders take us for £1BN” The Sun London 19 Oct., p.15.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Penrose, J (2003) “Cowboys jailed over Pounds 1m scam on elderly” The Sun London 25 Oct., p. 23.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Peppin, J (1995) Feminism, Law and the Pharmaceutical Industry, in F. Pearce & L. Snider (eds) Corporate Crime: Contemporary Debates. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Powell, D (2005) “The posse; Riding out to beat cowboy builders” Daily Post Liverpool 20 May, p. 2.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Product Safety-Problem Solved? PS-Not? (2005) www.rospa.com/productsafety/articles/problem_solved.htm accessed July 2005.
  64. 64.
    Prynn, J (2004) ”Exposed: rip-offs of cowboy Workmen” Evening Standard London 22 Jan., p. 1.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Punch, M (1996) Dirty Business: Exploring Corporate Misconduct. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rahman, B (2003) ‘Sentences outrage consumer groups JAPAN POISONING CASE’ Financial times 28 May.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rosoff, S, Pontell, H and Tillman, R (1998) Profit without Honor: White Collar Crime and the Looting of America New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ruggiero, V. (1996) Organized and Corporate Crime in Europe: Offers that can’t be refused. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rowan, D and Kellow, J (2004) “Pack of porky pies” The Times 20 Mar, p. 16.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Schor, J (2004) “Born to Buy: The commercialised child and the New Consumer culture” Scribner.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Shapiro, S (1990) “Collaring the crime, not the criminal: re-considering the concept of white collar crime”, 55 American Sociological Review, 346–65.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Slapper, G and Tombs, S (1999) Corporate Crime. London: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Simpson, S and Elis, L (1996) ‘Theoretical Perspectives on the corporate victimization of women’, in E. Szockyj and J.G. Fox (eds) Corporate Victimisation of Women. Boston, Mass: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Snider, L (1996) ‘Directions for Social Change and Political Action’ in E. Szockyj & J.G. Fox (eds) Corporate Victimisation of Women. Boston, Mass: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Stringer D (2003) ‘Maggot Pete’ gets six years for food fraud’ The Independent 13 Dec., p. 13.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Sutherland, E (1949) White Collar Crime New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Titus, RM, Heinzelman, F and Boyle, JM (1995) ‘Victimization of Persons by Fraud’ Crime and Delinquency vol 41.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Titus, R.M. (2001) ‘Personal Fraud and its Victims’ in Shover N & Wright J P (eds) Crimes of Privilege: Readings in White-Collar Crime. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Thomas, P (2001) Cleaning Yourself to Death. Newleaf, Dublin.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Uhlig, R (2004) “Farmhouse fresh? It’s more likely to have been produced on an industrial estate Government watchdog accuses supermarkets and manufacturers of duping shoppers with misleading labels” The Daily Telegraph 12 Feb., p 04.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Utton, T (2004) “It may say organic, but it could be GM; Misleading labels blamed for not warning of polluted soya: Daily Mail campaign Frankenstein food watch” Daily Mail 11 Mar., p. 15.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Vaughan, D and Carlo, G (1975) “The appliance repairman: a study of victim-responsiveness and fraud”, 12 Journal of Research in crime and Delinquency, 153–61.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Which? (2002) ‘Food Labelling’ Which? Online Dec 2002.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Which? (2004a) ‘Food Safety’ Which? Online Feb 2004.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Which? (2004b) ‘No to GM’ Which? Online Sep 2004.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Which? (2004d) ‘Cereal Offenders’ Which? Online April 2004.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Which? (2004e) ‘Trick packs? Which? Online Nov 2004.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Which? (2004f) Products Recalls: A burning issue Which? Online March 2004.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Which? (2005a) ‘Nutrition labelling’ Which? Online March 2005.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Which? (2005b) ‘Food Packaging’ Which? Online April 2005.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Whiteside, P (2005) “The Danes and Germans have cracked down on ring tone rip-offs …why can't we?; Britain’s mobile phone giants accused of hypocrisy” Mail on Sunday 8 May, p. 43.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Women’s Environmental Network (WEN) www.wen.org.uk
  93. 93.
    Women’s Environmental Network (2005) www.wen.org.uk/cosmetics/facts.htm accessed 27/07/05.
  94. 94.
    Woods (2005a) Women’s Environmental Network (WEN) www.wen.org.uk accessed July 2004.
  95. 95.
    Woods, J (2005b) “Is make-up making you sick? Britain’s £6 billion cosmetics and toiletries industry is facing calls to tighten up safeguards on its chemical ingredients. Just how safe are our lipsticks and moisturisers, asks Judith Woods’ The Daily Telegraph 18 Mar., p 022.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Law Division, School of Law and Social SciencesGlasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations