Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 50, Issue 4–5, pp 263–291 | Cite as

The underworld of art

Article

Abstract

Although crime in the market for fine arts has a long historical pedigree, the explosive growth of the market, and the conversion of art (along with collectible goods of all sorts) into speculative assets, that began or at least accelerated in the mid 1970s, focused increasing attention on the phenomenon. At the same time the issue of protecting cultural patrimony became a subject of greater contention between source and market countries, while common law and civil code jurisdictions struggled over how to reconcile approaches to regulation and enforcement. This paper highlights these issues with specific reference to the market for high-end paintings although its lessons are germane to all subdivisions of the collectibles market. It attempts to elucidate the main criminogenic factors—speculative shifts in demand, fraudulent supply, and illegal activity by various intermediary institutions ranging from dealers to appraisers to auction houses, while highlighting the role of collectors, museums, and financial institutions both as victims and active participants. Despite enduring myths about “organized crime,” illegal operations in the art market are the work overwhelmingly of insiders who alone have the technical knowledge and circle of intimates necessary to link an illicit supply with a demand that can range from the strictly legitimate, the legal but dubious, and the explicitly criminal. The critical lesson is that stolen, forged or smuggled material makes its way through much the same circles of intermediaries and ends up for the most part in the same locations and the same hands as artwork of legal origin.

References

  1. 1.
    Conklin, J. (1994). Art crime. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Middlemas, K. (1975). The double market: Art theft and art thieves. Middlemas, UK.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Massey, L. (2000). Le Vol D’Oeuvres D’Art: Une criminalité méconnue. Brussels.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mackenzie, S. (2005). Criminal and victim profiles in art theft: opportunity and repeat victimization. Art, Antiquities and Law, X(4), 353–370.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoving, T. (1996). False impressions: The hunt for big-time art fakes pp. 60–62. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reitlinger, G. (1961). The economics of taste: The rise and fall of the picture market 1766–1960 (p. 39). New York.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Myer, G. (1907). History of the great American fortunes. New York.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Watson, P. (1992). From Manet to Manhattan: The rise of the modern art market. New York.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    von Larsons, M. J. (a pseudonym) (1929). An expert in the service of the Soviet. London: Ernest Benn. translated from the German original.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams, R. (1980). Russian art and American money 1900–1940. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Epstein, E. J. (1996). Dossier: The secret history of Armand Hammer. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Secrest, M. (2004). Duveen: A life in art. New York.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Attwood, R. (2004). Stealing history. New York: St. Martin Chap 10.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alford, K. (1995). The spoils of World War II: The American military’s role in sealing Europe’s treasures. New York.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alford, K. (2000). Great treasure stories of World War II. Mason City.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frank, R. (2007). Richistan: A journey through the American wealth boom and the lives of the new rich. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Green, T. (1967). The smugglers (p. 231). London.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meyer, K. (1973). The plundered past. New York.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cone, T. (1990). The kindness of strangers. Arts Magazine, May–Sept.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Naylor, R. T. (2004). Hot money and the politics of debt (3rd ed.). Montreal, chaps. 15, 16.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stein, A.-M. (to George Carpozi) (1973). Three Picassos before breakfast: Memoirs of an Art Forger’s wife. New York.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Decker, A. (1988). Limited editions. ARTnews Summer.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Watson, P. (1997). Sotheby’s: The inside story. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sherman, W. (1990). The Marcos collection. ARTNews Oct.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McPhee, J. (1994), The Ransom of Russian Art. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Akinsha, K., et al. (1996). The betrayal of the Russian Avant-Garde. ARTnews Feb.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    McKenzie, S., & Green, P. (2008). Performative regulation: a case study in how powerful people avoid criminal labels. British Journal of Criminology, 48, 138–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations