Advertisement

Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 153–165 | Cite as

The dual nature of anti-corruption agencies in China

  • Stephen K. Ma
Article

Abstract

As the pace of modern life quickens considerably and changes come fast and furious in public affairs, the qualifications based on which public servants are recruited, the skills they are required to master in order to deal with the new situation, the challenges they are faced with, and the administrative behavior they demonstrate are all no longer the same. Bureaucrats in anti-corruption agencies are no exception. This article will review the latest development in China’s public administration, as unethical bureaucratic behavior in anti-corruption agencies has been among the increasingly vexing pathologies the authorities have to cope with.

Keywords

Chinese Communist Party Public Security Party Member Party Committee Dual Loyalty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The author wishes to thank Prof. Philip Ivanhoe for his careful reading of an earlier draft of the paper and for his constructive comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Caiden, G. (1990). Abuse of public trust: fact or way of life? USA Today Magazine, July 1990 pp.58–60. Reprinted in Public Administration: Annual Editions, 3rd Edition, 1993, pp.23–25.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caiden, G. (2001). Corruption and governance. In G. E. Caiden, O. P. Dwivedi, & J. Jabbra (Eds.), Where corruption lives (pp. 21–26). Bloomfield, Connecticut: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caiden, G. (2007). The civilizing mission of public administration. In D. Argyriades et al. (Eds.), Public administration in transition: A fifty-year trajectory worldwide (p. 273). Portland, Oregon: Vallentine Mitchell.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooper, T. L. (1998). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role (4th Ed., p. 145) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Finer, H. (1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friedrich, C. J. (1940). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. In C. J. Friedrich, & E. S. Mason (Eds.), Public policy: A yearbook of the graduate school of public administration. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gong, T. (2004). Dependent judiciary and unaccountable judges: Judicial corruption in contemporary China. China Review, 4(2), 33–54.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guang, J. (2005). Wu Guanzheng, secretary of the central commission for discipline inspection, tenders his resignation. Cheng Ming Monthly (pp. 19–20). September.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guang, J. (2005). The central commission for discipline inspection shakes the central secretariat. Cheng Ming Monthly (pp. 17–18) November.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Madison, J. (1788). Federalist No.51. Reprinted In A. T. Mason & G. E. Baker (Eds.), Free government in the making (4th Ed., p. 272). New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ma, S. K. (1989). Reform corruption: A discussion on China’s current development. Pacific Affairs (pp. 40–52). Spring.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Manion, M. (2004). Corruption by design: Building clean government in mainland China and Hong Kong (pp. 201–203). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Plant, J. F. (2001). Codes of ethics. In T. L. Cooper (Ed.), Handbook of administrative ethic (2nd Ed., p. 309). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior (9th Ed., p. 109). New Jersey, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sun, Y. (2004). Corruption and market in contemporary China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Transparency International (2004). Global corruption report 2004: Special focus: Political corruption (pp. 178–179). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Transparency International (2006). Report on the transparency international. global corruption barometer 2006, p.6. See http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/gcb/2006.
  18. 18.
    The World Bank (2007). Data regulation: Measuring governance and corruption. In W. L. Richter & F. Burke (Eds.), Combating corruption, encouraging ethics: A practical guide to management ethics (2nd Ed., p. 171). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceCalifornia State UniversityLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations