Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 46, Issue 1–2, pp 65–85 | Cite as

Profiles of punishment and privilege: secret and disputed deviance during the racialized transition to American adulthood

Article

Abstract

This paper combines Glenn Loury’s (The anatomy of racial inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002) thought experiments about racial inequality with Howard Becker’s (Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York, NY: Free, 1963) typology of deviance to guide the analysis of three waves of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. The results reveal the racial anatomy of punishment and privilege during the transition to American adulthood. Our analysis points to a substantial pool of white American youth and emerging adults whose partying behavior is a prevalent form of unsanctioned secret deviance. These disproportionately white and economically advantaged secret deviants contrast with a smaller but significant number of African-American youth and emerging adults who dispute their designations by the juvenile and criminal courts as official deviants. While the privileged position of a party subculture may in social–psychological terms be enabling and even empowering for youthful and affluent white Americans, the selective punishment of other forms of drug activity and delinquency is disabling for African-Americans in profound and less recognized ways. The importance of the data presented in this paper is to expose the comparative probabilities of black and white punishment and privilege. The results reveal concealed racial conventions involved in the construction of the American collective conscience, which Loury identifies as a source of our cognitive imprisonment.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bachman, J., Wallace, J., O’Malley, P., Johnston, L., Kurth, C., & Neighbors, H. (1991). Racial/ethnic differences in smoking, drinking, and illicit drug use among American high school seniors, 1976–1989. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 372–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bearman, P. S., Jones, J., & Udry, J. R. (1997). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research design. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center. (Available at: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design.html. Retrieved October 4, 2003).
  3. 3.
    Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York, NY: Free.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chantala, K., & Tabor, J. (1999). Strategies to perform a design-based analysis using the Add Health data. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark, B., & Trow, M. (1966). The organizational context. In T. Newcomb & E. Wilson (Eds.), College peer groups: Problems and prospects for research (pp. 17–70). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cloward, R., & Ohlin, L. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. New York, NY: Free.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohen, A. (1950). Delinquent boys. Chicago, NY: Free.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cohen, A., & Short, J. (1958). Research in delinquent subcultures. Journal of Social Issues, 24, 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coleman, J. (1961). The adolescent society. New York, NY: Free.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cullen, F., Larson, M., & Mathers, R. (1985). Having money and delinquency involvement: The neglect of power in delinquency theory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 171–192.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Currie, E. (2005). The road to whatever: Middle-class culture and the crisis of adolescence. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of U.S. high School students. American Sociological Review, 47, 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eisenstadt, S. M. (1956). From generation to generation. Glencoe, IL: Free.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption: Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. New York, NY: Free.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1986). The true value of lambda would appear to be zero: An essay on career criminals, criminal careers, selective incapacitation, cohort studies, and related topics. Criminology, 24, 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hagan, J. (1991). Destiny and drift: Subcultural preferences, status attainments and the risks and rewards of youth. American Sociological Review, 56, 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hagan, J. (1993). The social embeddedness of crime and unemployment. Criminology, 31, 465–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hagan, J., Gillis, A. R., & Simpson, J. (1985). The class structure of gender and delinquency: Toward a power-control theory of common delinquent behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 1151–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hagan, J., & Foster, H. (2005). Subcultural deviance, apathy and political disaffiliation in the transition to American adulthood. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haynie, D. (2003). Contexts of risk? Explaining the link between girls’ pubertal development and their delinquency involvement. Social Forces, 82, 355–397.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hindelang, M., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hobsbawm, E. (1994). Age of extremes: The short twentieth century. London, UK: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Loury, G. (2002). The anatomy of racial inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Luthar, S. (2003). The culture of affluence: Psychological costs of material wealth. Child Development, 74, 1581–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Malbon, B. (1999). Clubbing: Dancing, ecstasy and vitality. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and drift. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Matza, D. (1969). Becoming deviant. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Milner, M. (2004). Freaks, geeks, and cool kids: American teenagers, schools and the culture of consumption. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Parsons, T. (1942). Age and sex in the social structure of the United States. American Sociological Review, 7, 604–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pettit, B., & Western, B. (2004). Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. American Sociological Review, 69, 151–169.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P., Blum, R. W., Bauman, K. E., Harris, K. M., Jones, J., et al. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 823–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sperber, M. (2000). Beer and circus: How big-time college sports is crippling undergraduate education. New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stata Corporation (1999). Stata reference manual, release 6. College Station, TX: Stata.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Taylor, I. (1999). Crime in context: A critical criminology of market societies. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Udry, R. (2003). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), Waves I, II & III, 1994–2001 (machine-readable data file and documentation). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Udry, R., & Bearman, P. (1998). New methods for new research on adolescent sexual behavior. In R. Jessor (Ed.), New perspectives on adolescent risk behavior (pp. 241–269). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Udry, R., & Chantala, K. (2003). Missing school dropouts in surveys does not bias risk estimates. Social Science Research, 32, 294–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Veblen, T. (1934). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York, NY: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wiatrowski, M., Griswold, D., & Roberts, M. (1981). Social control theory and delinquency. American Sociological Review, 46, 525–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wolfgang, M. (1958). Patterns in criminal homicide. Philadelphia, PN: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wolfgang, M., & Ferracuti, F. (1967). The subculture of violence. London, UK: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wolfgang, M., Figlio, R., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wright, B., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T., Miech, R., & Silva, P. (1999). Reconsidering the relationship between SES and delinquency. Criminology, 37, 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.American Bar FoundationNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyTexas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations