Online Public Response to Dutch News About Money Laundering

  • Romy M. Veul
  • Tessa C. van Charldorp
  • Melvin R. J. Soudijn


In this paper we analyze how Dutch Public Prosecution’s press releases about money laundering and underground banking are received by producers and consumers of online news reports. First we take a closer look at how journalists (re)framed six official press releases in 75 news reports. It turns out that journalists do not regularly adopt the success frame that the Public Prosecution uses in its press releases. Furthermore, the role of the Public Prosecution Service or the police is downplayed. The moral message that “crime should not pay” receives no coverage in news reports. Second, we analyze how the news reports generated 276 online comments. We distinguish three ways in which online commenters respond to news reports; they (1) appreciate, (2) downplay or (3) condemn the authorities’ success. Commenters are particularly likely to downplay or condemn the police’s success. When a news report focuses on ‘underground bankers’, commenters often express a negative opinion about the effort to curb money laundering. It also appears that readers did not always understand the use of a term like underground banking.


Communication policy Conversation analysis Hawala Money laundering Underground banking 


  1. Algemene Rekenkamer [Netherlands Court of Audit] (2014). Bestrijden witwassen: stand van zaken 2013. Google Scholar
  2. Babbie, E. (2013). The practice of social research. Boston: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  3. Ballard, R. B. (2003). A background report on the operation of informal value transfer systems (hawala). Manchester: University of Manchester Centre for Applied South Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Beunders, H. J. G., & Muller, E. (2005). Politie en media: feiten, fictie en imagopolitiek [Police and media: facts, fiction and image politics]. Zeist: Kerkebosch.Google Scholar
  5. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Financial Action Task Force (2003). Combating the Abuse of Alternative Remittance Systems: International Best Practices. Google Scholar
  7. Financial Action Task Force (2013). The role of Hawala and other similar service providers in money laundering and terrorist financing.Google Scholar
  8. Force, F. A. T. (2012). The FATF recommendations: International standards on combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism & proliferation. Paris: Financial Action Task Force (FATF).Google Scholar
  9. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Have, T. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: a practical guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Henrich, N., & Holmes, B. (2013). Web news readers’ comments: towards developing a methodology for using on-line comments in social inquiry. Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 5(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
  12. Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in action: interactions, identities and institutions. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  13. Jost, P. M., & Sandhu, H. S. (2000). Money laundering: the hawala alternative remittance system. Lyon: Interpol.Google Scholar
  14. Kleemans, E. R., Brienen, M. E. I., & Van de Bunt, H. G. (2002). Georganiseerde criminaliteit in Nederland: Tweede rapportage op basis van de WODC-monitor [Organized crime in the Netherlands: Second report of the WODC-organized crime monitor]. Den Haag: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek en Documentatiecentrum.Google Scholar
  15. Kruisbergen, E. W., Kleemans, E. R., & Kouwenberg, R. F. (2016). Explaining attrition: Investigating and confiscating the profits of organized crime. European Journal of Criminology. [Online first: ]
  16. Lamerichs, J. (2003). Discourse of support: Exploring online discussions on depression. PhD thesis Wageningen University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  17. Levi, M. (2015). Money for crime and money from crime: financing crime and laundering crime proceeds. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 21(2), 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maimbo, S. M. (2003). The money exchange dealers of Kabul: a study of the hawala system in Afghanistan. World Bank working paper no. 13. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maus, I. (2014). Atittudes van jongeren ten aanzien van de politie: een verkennend onderzoek naar de (gepercipieerde) procedurele rechtvaardigheid [Youngsters’ attitudes towards the police: an explorative study into the (perceived) procedural legitimacy]. In L.G. Moor, P. Ponsaers, M. de Vries, & M. Easton (Eds), Het gezag van de politie, 31, 141–164.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, J., Davis, R.C., Henderson, N.J., MarkoviC, J. & Ortiz, C.W. (2003). Public opinions of the police: the influence of friends, family, and news media. Vera Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  21. Pander Maat, H. (2007). How promotional language in press releases is dealt with by journalists: genre mixing or genre conflict? Journal of Business Communication, 44(1), 59–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pander Maat, H. (2008). Editing and genre conflict: how newspaper journalists clarify and neutralize press release copy. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht. Accessed 4 June 2015.
  23. Pander Maat, H., & De Jong, C. (2012). How newspaper journalists reframe product press release information. Journalism, 1–24.Google Scholar
  24. Passas, N. (1999). Informal value transfer systems and criminal organizations: a study into so-called underground banking networks. Den Haag: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek en Documentatiecentrum.Google Scholar
  25. Passas, N. (2003). Informal Value Transfer Systems, Terrorism and Money Laundering: A Report to the National Institute of Justice (Report).Google Scholar
  26. Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation Analysis: An Approach to the Study of Social Action as Sense Making Practices. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction (pp. 64–91). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004). The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2), 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rijksoverheid. (2015). Rijksbegroting 2015. Retrieved from: [10 February 2016].
  29. Sacks, H. (1992). The baby cried. The mommy picked it up. In H. Sacks (Ed.), Lectures on conversation. Cambridge: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  30. Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schuth, A., Marx, M., & De Rijke, M. (2007). Extracting the discussion structure in comments on news-articles. Proceedings of the 9 th annual ACM international workshop on web information and data management, 97–104.Google Scholar
  32. Sneijder, P., & Te Molder, H. F. M. (2004). ‘Health should not have to be a problem’: talking health and accountability in an Internet forum on veganism. Journal of Health Psychology, 9(4), 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soudijn, M. R. J. (2015). Hawala and money laundering: the potential use of red flags for persons offering hawala services. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 21(2), 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stevens, L. (2010). Strafzaken in het nieuws: over ontsporende media en de verantwoordelijkheid van het Openbaar Ministerie [Court cases in the news: about media that get off the track and the responsibility of the Public Prosecution Service]. Nederlands Juristenblad, 85(11), 660–665.Google Scholar
  35. Stommel, W. (2009). Entering an online support group on eating disorders: a discourse analysis. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  36. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: a theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Charldorp, T. C., & Van den Heerik, R. A. M. (2013). Schrijven, hyven, facebooken, rappen en tweeten over criminaliteit en de politie: Een talige kijk in de leefwereld, normen en waarden van Nederlandse jongeren [Writing, hyving, facebooking, rapping and tweeting about crime and the police: a linguistic look into Dutch youngster’s social environment, norms and values]. Politie en Wetenschap Verkenningen, 2013.Google Scholar
  38. Van de Bunt, H. (2008). A case study on the misuse of hawala banking. International Journal of Social Economics, 35(9), 691–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van den Heerik, R. A. M., & Van Charldorp, T. C. (2015). Die agent moet ‘t goede voorbeeld geven’: kwalitatief onderzoek naar opvattingen van jongeren over de politie. [’That police officer should set an example’. [Quantitative research into youngster’s opinions about the police]. Cahiers Politiestudies, 1(34), 11–32.Google Scholar
  40. Van der Knoop, J., & Rollingswier, R. (2015). De bestrijding van witwassen, beschrijving en effectiviteit 2010–2013. [Combatting money laundering, description and effectivity 2010–2013]. Den Haag: WODC.Google Scholar
  41. Vayreda, A., & Antaki, C. (2009). Social support and unsolicited advice in a bipolar disorder online forum. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 931–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu, Y. (2010). College students’ evaluation of police performance: a comparison of Chinese and Americans. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 773–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Romy M. Veul
    • 1
  • Tessa C. van Charldorp
    • 2
  • Melvin R. J. Soudijn
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Language, Literature and Communication (Faculty of Humanities)VU UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Languages, Literature and Communication (Faculty of Humanities)Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Central Intelligence Division, Research & AnalysisThe National Police of the NetherlandsZoetermeerThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations