Vehicle Theft Reduction in Germany: The Long-Term Effectiveness of Electronic Immobilisation

Article

Abstract

From 1995 on all new vehicles sold in Germany must be fitted with an electronic immobiliser. This measure was part of a comprehensive police plan which, adopted in 1994, reacted to the unprecedented increase in vehicle theft after German re-unification and the breakdown of the former USSR. Whilst international research has already shown that electronic immobilisation is an effective tool to reduce vehicle thefts, comparable studies for Germany have not existed. Based on the situational crime prevention approach, this study indicates that the substantial vehicle theft reductions recorded over the last 15 years in Germany can be explained in particular by the introduction of electronic immobilisers as a ‘target hardening’ mechanism. It will be shown that immobilisers not only effectively obstruct opportunistic vehicle thieves, but also increase the efforts of professional vehicle trafficking groups. Since an external impact evaluation has never been planned for this measure, the study followed a mixed methods approach in using available police data as well as complementary interviews with key experts.

Keywords

Vehicle theft Immobilisation Crime prevention Crime reduction Displacement Motorcycle theft Opportunistic offenders Professional offenders Evaluation Mixed-methods design 

References

  1. Barr, R., & Pease, K. (1990). Crime Placement, Displacement, and Deflection. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: a review of research (Vol. 12). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bohnsack, R., Marotzki, W., & Meuser, M. (2003). Hauptbegriffe qualitativer Sozialforschung [Main concepts of qualitative social research]. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  3. Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler [Research methods and evaluation for human and social scientists] (4th ed.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, R. (2004). The effectiveness of electronic immobilisation: Changing patterns of temporary and permanent vehicle theft. Crime Prevention Studies, 17, 101–119.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, R., & Thomas, N. (2003). Aging vehicles: Evidence of the Effectiveness of New Car Security from the Home Office Car Theft Index. Security Journal, 16(3), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bundeskriminalamt. (1994). Bekämpfungskonzeption ‘Kraftfahrzeugkriminalität‘ [Crime reduction conception ‘vehicle crime‘]. Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt.Google Scholar
  7. Bundeskriminalamt. (2008). Kfz-Kriminalität. Bundeslagebild 2007. Pressefreie Kurzfassung [Vehicle Crime. Federal review 2007. Press released abridged version]. Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt.Google Scholar
  8. Bundeskriminalamt. (2009). Kfz-Kriminalität. Bundeslagebild 2008. Pressefreie Kurzfassung [Vehicle Crime. Federal review 2008. Press released abridged version]. Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt.Google Scholar
  9. Bundeskriminalamt. (2010). Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik, Tabelle 01 [Police Crime Statistics, Table 01]. Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt.Google Scholar
  10. Bundesministerium des Innern/Bundesministerium der Justiz. (2001). Erster Periodischer Sicherheitsbericht [First Periodical Report on Crime and Crime Control]. Berlin: Bundesministerium des Innern/Bundesministerium der Justiz.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, R. (1997) ‘Introduction’ in R. Clarke (ed) Situational Crime Prevention: Successful case studies, 2nd ed, Monsey: Criminal Justice Press, 1–45.Google Scholar
  12. Clarke, R. (1999). ‘Hot Products: understanding, anticipating and reducing demand for stolen goods’ in Home Office Police Research Series Paper 112. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  13. Clarke, R. and Cornish, D. (2003) ‘Opportunities, Precipitators and Criminal Decisions: A Reply to Wortley’s Critique of Situational Crime Prevention’ in M. Smith and D. Cornish (eds.) Theory for Situational Crime Prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 16. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press. 2003.Google Scholar
  14. Clarke, R., & Harris, P. (1992). Auto Theft and its Prevention. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: a review of research (Vol. 16). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. (1987). Understanding Crime Displacement: An Application of Rational Choice Theory. Criminology, 25, 933–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deggerich, M. and Winter, S. (2010) ‘Purloined Porsches: Germany's Open Borders a Boon for Car Thieves’, SPIEGEL ONLINE INTERNATIONAL, 5 June, http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,693129,00.html, (accessed 23 January 2011).
  17. DER SPIEGEL (1993) ‘Arbeitskleidung: Kaschmiranzug‘ [Work Clothes: Cashmere suit], Nr. 44, 1 November, http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13692647.html, (accessed 23 January 2011).
  18. Dhami, M. (2008). Youth auto theft: A survey of a general population of Canadian youth. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 50, 187–209.Google Scholar
  19. Donkin, S., & Wellsmith, M. (2006). Cars Stolen in Burglaries: The Sandwell Experience. Security Journal, 19, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eck, J. (1993). The threat of crime displacement. Criminal Justice Abstracts, 25(3), 527–546.Google Scholar
  21. Ekblom, P. (1997). ‘Gearing Up Against Crime: a Dynamic Framework to Help Designers Keep up with the Adaptive Criminal in a Changing World’ International Journal of Risk. Security and Crime Prevention, 2(4), 249–265.Google Scholar
  22. FOCUS (1993) ‘Brennpunkt: AUTODIEBSTAHL’ [Focus: VEHICLE THEFT], Vol. 34, 23 August, http://www.focus.de/panorama/boulevard/brennpunkt-autodiebstahl_aid_143301.html, (accessed 23 January 2011).
  23. Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft (2008) Autodiebstahl 2007: Hohes Diebstahlrisiko für ältere Fahrzeuge - Entschädigungsleistung 178,3 Millionen Euro [Vehicle theft 2007: High risk for older vehicles – Compensation paid 178.3 Million Euro], 21 October, http://www.GDV.de/Presse/Pressearchiv_Linkliste/Pressemeldungen_2008_Uebersichtsseite/inhaltsseite22991.html, (accessed 23 January 2011).
  24. Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft (2010) Autodiebstahl 2009: Erstmals seit 1993 wieder Anstieg der entwendeten Fahrzeuge – rund 13 Prozent mehr Pkw-Diebstähle [Vehicle theft 2009: Increase in stolen vehicles for the first time since 1993 - about 13 percent more thefts], 17 September, http://www.gdv.de/Presse/Pressearchiv_Linkliste/Pressemeldungen_2010_Uebersichtsseite/inhaltsseite28005.html, (accessed 23 January 2011).
  25. Gill, M., & Spriggs, A. (2005). ‘Assessing the impact of CCTV’ in Home Office Research Study 292. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  26. Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2006). Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse [Expert interviews and qualitative content analysis] (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  27. Gneckow, K. (1995) ‘Bekämpfung der internationalen Kfz-Verschiebung in einer Großstadt’ [Suppression of international vehicle trafficking in a major city] Deutsches Polizeiblatt, 10–14.Google Scholar
  28. Guerette, R., & Bowers, K. (2009). Assessing the Extent of Crime Displacement and Diffusion of Benefits: A Review of Situational Crime Prevention Evaluations. Criminology, 47(4), 1331–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hazelbaker, K. (1997). Insurance Industry Analyses and the Prevention of Motor Vehicle Theft. In M. Felson & R. V. Clarke (Eds.), Business and crime prevention. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hesseling, R. (1994). ‘Displacement: A Review of the Empirical Literature’ in R. Clarke (ed.) Crime Prevention Studies 3: 197–230. Monsey, New Jersey: Criminal Justice PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Keßler, J. (1995) ‘Die kriminologische und strafrechtliche Zuordnung im Bereich internationaler Kfz-Verschiebung’ [The criminological and penologic attribution with respect to international vehicle trafficking] Deutsches Polizeiblatt, 4–6.Google Scholar
  32. Kriven, S., & Ziersch, E. (2007). New car security and shifting vehicle theft patterns in Australia. Security Journal, 20, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laycock, G. (2004). The U.K. car theft index: an example of government leverage. Crime Prevention Studies, 17, 25–44.Google Scholar
  34. Levesley, T., Brown, G., Wilkinson, M., & Powell, C. (2004). ‘Emerging methods of vehicle theft - theft of keys’ in Home Office Findings 239. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  35. Lösel, F. (2004). Entwicklungsbezogene und technische Kriminalprävention: Konzeptuelle Grundlagen und Ergebnisse‘ [Developmental and technical crime prevention: conceptual basics and results]. In H. Schöch, J.-M. Jehle, & P. Aebersold (Eds.), Angewandte Kriminologie zwischen Freiheit und Sicherheit (pp. 175–203). Godesberg: Forum-Verlag.Google Scholar
  36. Luff, J., & Sutterer, P. (2003). Diebstahl von Kraftfahrzeugen [Thefts of vehicles]. München: Bayerisches Landesvermessungsamt.Google Scholar
  37. Mähler, K. (1999). Internationale Kfz-Verschiebung – Organisierte Kriminalität mit Zukunft [International vehicle trafficking – Organised crime will persist]. Polizeinachrichten, 39(4), 11–15.Google Scholar
  38. Mayhew, P., Clarke, R., & Elliot, D. (1989). ’Motorcycle Theft. Helmet Legislation and Displacement’ The Howard Journal, 28(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McGaghy, C., Giordano, P. & Henson, T. (1977). ‘Auto-theft: Offender and offense characteristics' In: Criminology, 15, 367–385.Google Scholar
  40. MM Starrs Pty Ltd. (2002). Principles for compulsory immobiliser schemes. Melbourne, AUS: National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council.Google Scholar
  41. National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council. (2001). Annual Report 2001. Melbourne: National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council.Google Scholar
  42. Peters, I. (2006) Diebstahl und Verschiebung hochwertiger Kfz nach Osteuropa. Massendelikt, Bandendiebstahl oder Bestandteil der OK? [Theft and trafficking of premium vehicles towards Eastern Europe. Widespread criminal offence, theft committed by gangs or Organised Crime?]. Wiesbaden: Fachhochschule des Bundes für öffentliche Verwaltung/Fachbereich Öffentliche Sicherheit.Google Scholar
  43. Potter, R., & Thomas, P. (2001). Engine immobilisers: how effective are they? Adelaide: National CARS Project.Google Scholar
  44. Ratzel, M., & Lippert, P. (2001). International organisierte Kraftfahrzeugkriminalität’ [International Organised Vehicle Crime]. Kriminalistik, 55(11), 705–713.Google Scholar
  45. Reinhardt, A. (1996). ‘Internationale Kfz-Verschiebung. Berlin als Dreh- und Angelpunkt der Ostroute’ [International vehicle trafficking. Berlin as the lynchpin of the eastern route]. Kriminalistik, 8–9, 573–579.Google Scholar
  46. Repetto, T. (1976). Crime prevention and the displacement phenomenon. Crime and Delinquency, 22, 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sallybanks, J., & Brown, R. (1998). ‘Vehicle Crime Reduction: Turning the Corner’ in Police Research Series, Paper 119. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  48. Sehr, P. (1995). Illegale Kraftfahrzeugverschiebung. Kraftfahrzeugverschiebung als Teil der Organisierten Kriminalität [Illegal vehicle trafficking. Vehicle trafficking as part of Organised Crime]. der Kriminalist, 3, 120–126.Google Scholar
  49. Simmons, R. (2008). Questionnaires. In Researching Social Life, 3 rd edn (N. Gilbert, pp. 182–205). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, D., Gregson, M., & Morgan, J. (2003). ‘Between the lines: an evaluation of the Secured Car Park Award Scheme’ in Home Office Research Study 266. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  51. Stannies, A. (1995) ‘Wegfahrsperre. Autodiebe ohne Chance‘ [Immobiliser. Vehicle thieves without a chance], FOCUS, Vol. 49, 4 December, http://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/wegfahrsperre-autodiebe-ohne-chance_aid_154665.html, (accessed 23 January 2011).
  52. Stumpf, R. (1999). Das Zusammenwirken verschiedener Sicherungstechnologien ist am effektivsten‘ [The interacting of different security technologies delivers the best effects]. POLIZEI-heute, 5, 154–158.Google Scholar
  53. Tremblay, P., Clermont, Y., & Cusson, M. (1994). Jockeys and joyriders. British Journal of Criminology, 34(3), 307–321.Google Scholar
  54. Truscheit, K. (2010) ‘Mit dem Zieh-Fix in die Limousine’ [With the ’Zieh-Fix’ into the sedan], Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 19 May, http://www.faz.net/s/Rub77CAECAE94D7431F9EACD163751D4CFD/Doc∼EE9C120757C0F448087F64203331720D9∼ATpl∼Ecommon∼Scontent.html, (accessed 23 January 2011).
  55. Webb, B. (1994) ‘Steering column locks and motor vehicle theft: Evaluations from three countries’ in R. Clarke, (ed.) Crime Prevention Studies, Vol 2, 71–91, Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice PressGoogle Scholar
  56. Webb, B. (2007). Preventing vehicle crime. In N. Tilley (Ed.), Handbook of crime prevention and community safety (pp. 458–485). Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  57. Werle, T. (1995). International organisierte Kraftfahrzeug-Verschiebung’ [International organised vehicle trafficking]. Kriminalistik, 1, 78–80. 153–159.Google Scholar
  58. Zapp, A. (1995). Kfz-Verschiebung – das Delikt der 90er Jahre?’ [Vehicle trafficking - the criminal offence of the 1990 s?]. Hessische Polizeirundschau, 8, 12–14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bingen am RheinGermany

Personalised recommendations