Wildlife Crime: The Problems of Enforcement

  • Melanie WellsmithEmail author


Environmental and wildlife crime appear recently to be benefitting from an increasing profile amongst those agencies tasked with their control, as well as receiving growing criminological attention. Despite this, those with responsibilities in this area report that it remains marginalised, receiving limited resources and suffering from a lack of political impetus to push such problems higher up the agenda. This is particularly so for those agencies, such as the police, that may be seen to have many more pressing objectives. This discussion paper considers the problems of relying on an enforcement approach to controlling such offences, taking, as an example, those activities that may be termed ‘wildlife crime’, focusing on the situation in England and Wales. Firstly, the legislative framework that criminalises harm or exploitation of wildlife is presented, alongside the main enforcement methods used. Next, the problems facing an enforcement approach are critically considered, the key issues being: under-resourcing and marginalisation, the large ‘dark-figure’ of wildlife crime, the possibility of corruption, the lack of seriousness with which such crimes are viewed, and the lack of deterrent effect. Finally, responses to the problems of enforcement are presented, categorised as either methods to improve enforcement or, as the author advocates, methods which are alternatives to enforcement (such as adopting a crime prevention approach). The paper concludes with suggestions for future research in this field.


Crime prevention Deterrence Enforcement Environmental crime Wildlife crime 


  1. Akella, A.S. and Cannon, J.B. (2004). Strengthening the weakest links: Strategies for improving the enforcement of environmental laws globally. Washington, DC: Center for Conservation and Government. In: R. White (Ed) (2009), Environmental Crime; A reader, 528-67. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. BBC News (2010). Emperor Exmoor deer kill brings call for protection. 27 October 2010. [online] available at (accessed 29 October 2010).
  3. Beirne, P. (1999). For a nonspeciesist criminology; Animal abuse as an object of study. Criminology, 37(1), 117–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beirne, P., & South, N. (Eds.). (2007). Issues in Green Criminology. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  5. Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brack, D. (2002). Combatting international environmental crime. Global Environmental Change, 12, 142-7. In R. White (Ed.), (2009), Environmental Crime; A reader, 485-92. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Bulte, E., & Rondeau, D. (2007). Compensation for wildlife damages; Habitat conversion, species preservation and local welfare. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 54, 311–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cantu Guzman, J. C. (2007). The Illegal Parrot Trade in Mexico; A comprehensive assessment. Washington, DC: Defenders of Wildlife.Google Scholar
  9. Cazaux, G. (2007). Labelling Animals; Non-speciesist criminology and techniques to identify other animals. In P. Beirne & N. South (Eds.), Issues in Green Criminology (pp. 87–113). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Chancellor of the Exchequer. (2010). Spending Review 2010. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  11. Chan, J., & Oxley, D. (2004). The deterrent effect of capital punishment; A review of the research evidence. New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research: Crime and Justice Bulletin. Sydney.Google Scholar
  12. Clarke, R.V. (2009). Designing Out Crime from Products. Workshop on Crime Science. University of Twente, Entschede, May 2009.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social Change and Crime Rate Trends. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook, D., Roberts, M., & Lowther, J. (2002). The International Wildlife Trade and Organised Crime; A review of the evidence and the role of the UK. Godalming: WWF-UK.Google Scholar
  15. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. G. (1986). The Reasoning Criminal. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2003). Opportunities, Precipitators and Criminal Decisions; A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. In M. J. Smith & D. B. Cornish (Eds.), Theory for Practice in Situational Crime Prevention. Crime Prevention Studies Vol. 16, 41-96. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cowdrey, D. (2002). Switching Channels; Wildlife trade routes into Europe and the UK. A WWF/TRAFFIC report. Godalming: WWF-UK.Google Scholar
  18. Damania, R. and Bulte, E.H. (2001). The Economics of Captive Breeding and Endangered Species Conservation. Centre for International Economic Studies. Adelaide: University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
  19. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) (2010). Wildlife Crime. [online] available at (accessed 28 October 2010).
  20. de Prez, P. (2000). Excuses, excuses: the ritual trivialisation of environmental prosecutions. Journal of Environmental Law, 12(1), 65-77. In: R. White (Ed) (2009), Environmental Crime; A reader, 656-69. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  21. Du Rées, H. (2001). Can criminal law protect the environment? Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 2, 109-26. In R. White (Ed.), (2009), Environmental Crime; A reader (pp. 638–55). Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  22. Engler, M., & Parry-Jones, R. (2007). Opportunity or threat; The role of the European Union in global wildlife trade. Brussels: TRAFFIC Europe.Google Scholar
  23. Felson, M. (1995). Those who discourage crime. In J. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and Place. Crime Prevention Studies Vol. 4, 53-66. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fortney, D. C. (2003). Thinking outside the ‘black box’; tailored enforcement in environmental criminal law. Texas Law Review, 81(6), 1609-35. In R. White (Ed.), (2009), Environmental Crime; A reader, 692-715. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  25. Francione, G. L. (1996). Rain without Thunder; The ideology of the animal rights movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fyfe, N., & Reeves, A. (2008). The Thin Green Line; The challenges of policing wildlife crime in Scotland. Stockholm, Sweden: Presentation to the Stockholm Criminology Symposium.Google Scholar
  27. Garstecki, T. (2006). Implementation of Article 16, Council Regulation (EC) No. 338/97 in the 25 member states of the European Union. A TRAFFIC Report for the European Commission. Brussels: TRAFFIC Europe.Google Scholar
  28. Gibbs, C., Gore, M. L., McGarrell, E. F., & Rivers, L., III. (2010). Introducing Conservation Criminology; Towards interdisciplinary scholarship on environmental crimes and risks. British Journal of Criminology, 50(1), 124–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented Policing. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  30. Guardian (2010). Hunting Act convictions at their highest. 29 October 2010.[online] available at (accessed 29 October 2010).
  31. Gunningham, N. and Grabosky, P. (1998). Smart Regulation; Designing environmental policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Cited in: R. White (2003) Environmental Issues and the Criminological Imagination. Theoretical Criminology, 7(4), 483-506.Google Scholar
  32. Guy, J. L. (2008). Migrants of No Return. Unpublished application to the UK Home Office Tilley Awards 2008.Google Scholar
  33. Hastings, S. (2010). Calls for change to law as attacks on birds of prey soar. Yorkshire Post 16 September 2010. [online] available at (accessed 26 December 2010).
  34. Herbig, F. J. W., & Joubert, S. J. (2006). Criminological Semantics; Conservation criminology – Vision or vagary? Acta Criminologica, 19, 88–103.Google Scholar
  35. Herbig, J. (2010). The illegal reptile trade as a form of conservation crime; A South African criminological investigation. In R. White (Ed.), Global Environmental Harm; Criminological Perspectives (pp. 110–31). Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  36. Interpol (2010). Environmental Crime. [online] available at (accessed 1 Nov 2010).
  37. Jenkins, C. (2008). Operation Charm. Investigative Practice Journal, 19, 6–9.Google Scholar
  38. Joint Nature Conservation Committee (2010). UK Legislation. [online] available at (accessed 28 October 2010).
  39. Lemieux, A. M., & Clarke, R. V. (2009). The International Ban on Ivory Sales and Its Effects on Elephant Poaching in Africa. British Journal of Criminology, 49(4), 451–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lowther, J., Cook, D., & Roberts, M. (2002). Crime and Punishment in the Wildlife Trade. A WWF/TRAFFIC Report. Godalming: WWF-UK.Google Scholar
  41. Lynch, M. J., & Stretesky, P. B. (2003). The Meaning of Green; Contrasting criminological perspectives. Theoretical Criminology, 7, 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MacKenzie, D. L. (2002). Reducing the criminal activities of known offenders and delinquents; Crime prevention in the courts and corrections. In L. W. Sherman, D. P. Farrington, B. C. Welsh, & D. L. MacKenzie (Eds.), Evidenced-based Crime Prevention (pp. 330–404). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Magistrates’ Court Association (2002). Sentencing for Wildlife Trade and Conservation Offences. [online] available at (accessed 1 November 2010).
  44. Mailley, J. (2008). Situational Crime Prevention in Wildlife Crime. London: Presentation to the National Environmental Crime Conference.Google Scholar
  45. Mailley, J., & Clarke, R. V. (2008). Environmental Criminology and Wildlife Crime. Izmir, Turkey: Presentation to the Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis Symposium (ECCA).Google Scholar
  46. McMullan, J. L., & Perrier, D. C. (2002). Lobster poaching and the ironies of law enforcement. Law & Society Review, 36(4), 679-720. In R. White (Ed.), (2009), Environmental Crime; A reader, 412-44. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  47. National Wildlife Crime Unit (2009). What is wildlife crime? [online] available at (accessed 29 October 2009).
  48. NWCU. (2010). UK National Wildlife Crime Unit; Annual Report 2010. Livingston: NWCU.Google Scholar
  49. Ong, D. M. (1998). The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES 1973); Implications of recent developments in international and EC environmental law. Journal of Environmental Law, 10, 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Partnership Against Wildlife Crime (PAW) (2010). About us. [online] available at (accessed 29 October 2010).
  51. Pires, S., & Clarke, R. (2010). Sequential foraging, itinerant fences and parrot poaching in Bolivia. Brisbane, Australia: Presentation to the Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis Symposium (ECCA).Google Scholar
  52. Rao, K. S., Maikhuri, R. K., Nautiyal, S., & Saxena, K. G. (2002). Crop damage and livestock depredation by wildlife; A case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. Journal of Environmental Management, 66, 317–27.Google Scholar
  53. RSPB (2009). Birdcrime 2009; Offences against wild bird legislation in 2009. Sandy: RSPB.Google Scholar
  54. Schneider, J. L. (2008). Reducing the Illicit Trade in Wildlife; The Market Reduction Approach. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, 274–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schmidt, C. W. (2004). Environmental Crimes; Profiting at the earth’s expense. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(2), A96-A103. In R. White (Ed.), (2009), Environmental Crime; A reader, 269/77. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  56. Scottish Government. (2008). Natural Justice; A joint thematic inspection of the arrangements in Scotland for preventing, investigating and prosecuting wildlife crime. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  57. Select Committee on Environmental Audit (2004). Sixth Report. [online] available at (accessed 1 November 2010).
  58. Sentencing Guidelines Council (2009). Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines. [online] available at (accessed 1 November 2010).
  59. Smith, R. J., & Walpole, M. J. (2005). Forum; Should conservationists pay more attention to corruption? Oryx, 39, 251–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, R.J., Muir, R.D.J., Walpole, M.J., Blamford, A. and Leader-Williams, N. (2003). Governance and the Loss of Biodiversity. Nature, 426, 67–70.Google Scholar
  61. Sutinen, J.G. (1987). Enforcement of the MFCMA; An economist’s perspective. Marine Fisheries, 49(3), 36-43. Cited in Akela, A.S. and Cannon, J.B. (2004). Strengthening the weakest links: Strategies for improving the enforcement of environmental laws globally. Washington, DC: Center for Conservation and Government. In: R. White (Ed) (2009), Environmental Crime; A reader, 528-67. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  62. Sutton, M. (1998). Handling Stolen Goods and Theft; A Market Reduction Approach. Home Office Research Study 178. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  63. Tilley, N. (2002). Crime prevention in Britain 1975-2010; Breaking out, breaking in and breaking down. In G. Hughes, E. McLaughlin, & J. Muncie (Eds.), Crime Prevention and Community Safety; New Directions (pp. 12–36). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Tittle, C. (1969). Crime Rates and Legal Sanctions. Social Problems, 16, 409–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. UK Environmental Law Association (2009a). Law and Your Environment [online] available at (accessed 28 October 2010).
  66. UK Environmental Law Association (2009b). Wildlife Offences: General Rules. [online] available at (accessed 28 October 2010).
  67. Wellsmith, M. (2008). Controlling Trade in Endangered Species; A role for crime prevention? British Society of Criminology Conference. University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield. July 2008.Google Scholar
  68. Wellsmith, M. (2010). The applicability of crime prevention to problems of environmental harm; A consideration of illicit trade in endangered species. In R. White (Ed.), Global Environmental Harm; Criminological perspectives (pp. 132–49). Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  69. White, R. (2003). Environmental Issues and the Criminological Imagination. Theoretical Criminology, 7(4), 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. White, R. (2005). Environmental Crime in Global Context; Exploring the theoretical and empirical complexities. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 16(3), 271–85.Google Scholar
  71. White, R. (2008). Crimes Against Nature. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  72. White, R. (Ed.). (2009). Environmental Crime; A reader. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  73. White, R. (Ed.). (2010). Global Environmental Harm; Criminological perspectives. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  74. Willock, A., Burgener, M., & Sancho, A. (2004). First Choice or Fall Back; An examination of issues relating to Appendix III of CITES to marine species. Cambridge: Traffic International.Google Scholar
  75. World Wildlife Fund (WWF) (2010). UK’s Wildlife Crime Unit endangered [online] available at (accessed 29 October 2010).
  76. Zimring, F., & Hawkins, G. (1973). Deterrence; The legal threat in crime control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  77. Zimmerman, M. E. (2003). The Black Market for Wildlife; Combating transnational organized crime in the illegal wildlife trade. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 36, 1657–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioural and Social SciencesUniversity of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK

Personalised recommendations