Crime Risk Assessments in New South Wales

Article

Abstract

Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) guidelines have been adopted in numerous jurisdictions around the world. In 2001, guidelines were introduced in New South Wales (Australia) to ensure that proposed developments/redevelopments of the built environment reflected key CPTED principles. The guidelines state that in certain circumstances a crime risk assessment is required for the proposed development and the resulting report forms part of the development application, which is reviewed by the relevant consent authority (a council or state government department depending upon the size of the development). To date, these guidelines have not been evaluated, making it impossible to assess their impact and the utility of the associated crime risk assessment reports. Moreover, much of the academic literature on CPTED has historically tended to focus on the implementation of CPTED strategies and not on the processes adopted pre-development. To partially fill this gap in knowledge, a small number (4) of publicly available crime risk assessment reports have been reviewed here and key issues highlighted. In particular, the relevance of some aspects of these reports is questioned, as is the impact of the relationship between the client (i.e. developer) commissioning the report and the findings of the ‘independent’ consultant. The small sample of risk assessment reports randomly selected for review cannot be considered representative of the larger body of such reports. Nonetheless, the insights generated from this exercise should be of interest to policy makers and practitioners engaged in this work.

Keywords

Consultants Crime prevention through environmental design Crime risk assessment Development applications 

References

  1. Australian Capital Territory Government (2000). Crime Prevention and Urban Design Resource Manual. Canberra: ACT Department of Urban Services.Google Scholar
  2. Brookes, S., Moss, K., & Pease, K. (2003). Data Sharing and Crime Reduction: The Long and Winding Road. Crime Prevention and Community Safety An International Journal, 5(4), 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2003). Opportunities, Precipitators and Criminal Decisions: A Reply to Wortley’s Critique of Situational Crime Prevention. In M. J. Smith & D. B. Cornish (Eds.), Theory for Practice in Situational Crime Prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 16. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  5. Crawford, A. (2000). Situational Crime Prevention, Urban Governance, Trust Relations. In A. von Hirsch, D. Garland, & A. Wakefield (Eds.), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Crowe, T. (2000). Crime Prevention through Environmental Design: Applications of Architectural Design and Space Management Concepts (2nd ed.). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  7. Garland, D. (2001). Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gill, M., Bryan, J., & Allen, J. (2007). Public Perceptions of CCTV in Residential Areas: ‘It Is Not As Good As We Thought It Would Be’. International Criminal Justice Review, 17(4), 304–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kinney, J. B., Brantingham, P. L., Wuschke, K., Kirk, M. G., & Brantingham, P. J. (2008). Crime Attractors, Generators and Detractors: Land Use and Urban Crime Opportunities. Built Environment, 34(1), 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Loader, I., & Walker, N. (2007). Civilising Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ministry of Justice (2005). National Guidelines for Crime Prevention through Environmental Design in New Zealand. Wellington: NZ Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  13. Minnery, J. R., & Lim, B. (2005). Measuring Crime Prevention through Environmental Design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 22(4), 330–338.Google Scholar
  14. Moss, K., & Pease, K. (2004). Data Sharing in Crime Prevention: Why and How. Crime Prevention and Community Safety An International Journal, 6(1), 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Newburn, T. (2007). Criminology. Devon: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Newman, O. (1972). Defensible Space: People and Design in the Violent City. London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  17. NSW Department of Planning (2007). Improving the Planning System. Sydney: NSW Department of Planning.Google Scholar
  18. NSW Department of Urban Affairs and Planning (2001). Crime prevention and the assessment of development applications: Guidelines under section 79c of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). Sydney: NSW DUAP.Google Scholar
  19. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2004). Safer Places: The Planning System and Crime Prevention. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
  20. Queensland Government (2007). Crime Prevention through Environmental Design: Guidelines for Queensland. Brisbane: Queensland Government.Google Scholar
  21. Reynald, D. M., & Effers, H. (2009). The Future of Newman’s Defensible Space Theory: Linking Defensible Space and the Routine Activities of Place. European Journal of Criminology, 6(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosenbaum, D. P., Lurigio, A. J., & Davis, R. C. (1998). The Prevention of Crime: Social and Situational Strategies. Belmont: West/Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  23. Schneider, R. H., & Kitchen, T. (2007). Crime Prevention and the Built Environment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Scottish Executive Planning Department (2006). Designing Safer Places, Planning Advice Note (PAN) 77. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Planning Department.Google Scholar
  25. Shaftoe, H. (2004). Crime Prevention: Facts, Fallacies and the Future. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  26. Shaftoe, H., & Read, T. (2005). Planning out crime: the appliance of science or an act of faith? In N. Tilley (Ed.), Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety. Devon: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Shearing, C., & Stenning, P. (1985). From the Panopticon to Disney World: The development of discipline. In E. Greenspan & A. Doob (Eds.), Perspectives in Criminal Law. Canada Law Book Inc: Ontario.Google Scholar
  28. South Australian Department of Transport and Urban Planning (2004). Designing Out Crime: Design Solutions for Safer Neighbourhoods. Adelaide: SA Department of Transport and Urban Planning.Google Scholar
  29. Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment (2005). Safer Design Guidelines for Victoria. Melbourne: Department of Sustainability and Environment.Google Scholar
  30. Weatherburn, D. (2004). Law and Order in Australia: Rhetoric and Reality. Annandale: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  31. Western Australian Planning Commission (2006). Designing Out Crime Planning Guidelines. Perth: Western Australian Planning Commission.Google Scholar
  32. Zedner, L. (2009). Security. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sydney Institute of Criminology, Law School Building (F10), Eastern Avenue, Camperdown CampusThe University of SydneyNewtownAustralia
  2. 2.Sydney Institute of Criminology / Crime Prevention ConsultantNewtownAustralia

Personalised recommendations