Advertisement

The Significance of the International Self-report Delinquency Study (ISRD)

  • Josine Junger-Tas
Article

Abstract

The subject of the article is the second ISRD study in which 30 countries participated and collaborated. The article describes the underlying rationale of the ISRD study, its objectives, organization, level of analysis and the way in which different criminological theories are tested. The most important aspects of international comparative self-report surveys are highlighted, such as the need for maximum standardization and for a steering group monitoring the whole process as well as the need for regular workshop meetings of participants. In the last section some illustrations of the study’s findings are presented.

Keywords

Juvenile delinquency Self-report surveys International research Comparative methodology Criminological theory Property crime Violent offenses Versatility 

References

  1. Alvazzi del Frate, A. (1998). Victims of crime in the developing countries, UNICRI, Publ.nr.57, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  2. Alvazzi del Frate, A., Hatalak, O., & Zvekic,U. (Eds.) (2000). Surveying crime: A global perspective. Proceedings of the International Conference Rome, 19–21 November 1998, National Institute of Statistics, Italy.Google Scholar
  3. Barberet, R., Bowling, B., Junger-Tas, J., Rechea-Alberola, C., van Kesteren, J., & Zurawan, A. (2004). Self-reported juvenile delinquency in England and Wales, The Netherlands and Spain. Helsinki, HEUNI.Google Scholar
  4. Bonoli, G. (1997). Classifying welfare states: a two dimensional approach. Journal of Social Policy, 26(3):351–372.Google Scholar
  5. Box, S. (1981). Deviance, reality and society. London/New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, L. E., & en Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Council of Europe (1995). European sourcebook of crime and criminal justice. Den Haag: Ministerie van Justitie.Google Scholar
  8. Council of Europe (2003). European sourcebook of crime and criminal justice. Den Haag: Ministerie van Justitie.Google Scholar
  9. Council of Europe (Ed.) (2006). European sourcebook of crime and criminal justice statistics-2006 (3rd ed.). Den Haag: Ministerie van Justitie.Google Scholar
  10. Decker, S. H., & Weerman, F. M. (Eds.) (2005). European street gangs and troublesome groups. New York: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
  11. Enzmann, D., Haen Marshall, I., Killias, M., Junger-Tas, J., Steketee, M., & Gruszczynska, B. (2010). Self-reported youth delinquency in Europe and beyond: First results of the second ISRD (International Self-Report Delinquency) study in the context of police and victimisation data. European Journal of Criminology.Google Scholar
  12. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. en Farrington, D. P., & West, D. J. (1990). The Cambridge study in delinquent development: A long-term follow-up of 411 males. In G. en Kaiser & H. J. Kerner (Eds.), Criminality: Personality, behaviour, life history. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Felson, M. (1998). Crime in everyday life—insight and implications for society (2deth ed.). Thousand Oaks/London: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ferrera, M. (1996). The ‘southern’ model of welfare in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.Google Scholar
  17. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, Tr. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hindelang, M. J. (1973). Causes of delinquency: A partial replication and extension. Social Problems, 20(4), 471–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirschi, Tr. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, R. E. (1979). Juvenile delinquency and its origins, an integrated theoretical approach. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Junger, M. (1989). Discrepancies between police and self-report data for Dutch racial minorities. British Journal of Criminology, 29, 273–283.Google Scholar
  23. Junger, M. (1990). Delinquency and ethnicity: An investigation on social factors relating to delinquency among Moroccan, Turkish, Surinamese and Dutch boys. Deventer/Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation.Google Scholar
  24. Junger-Tas, J. (1996). Youth and violence in Europe: A quantitative review. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 5, 31–58.Google Scholar
  25. Junger-Tas, J. (1997). Ethnic minorities and criminal justice in the Netherlands. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice—A Review of Research, 21, 257–310.Google Scholar
  26. Junger-Tas, J., & Decker, S. (2006). Handbook of international juvenile justice. New York/Dordrecht: Springer Publ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Junger-Tas, J., & Marshall, I. H. (1999). The self-report methodology in crime research. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice—A Review of Research, 25, 291–367.Google Scholar
  28. Junger-Tas, J., Klein, M. W., & Zhang, X. (1992). Problems and dilemmas in comparative self-report delinquency research. In D. P. Farrington, & S. Walklate (Eds.), Offenders and victims: Theory and policy. London: British Society of Criminology.Google Scholar
  29. Junger-Tas, J., Cruyff, M. J. L. F., de Looij-Jansen, P. M. v., & Reelick, F. (2003). Etnische Minderheden en het Belang van Binding: een Onderzoek naar Antisociaal gedrag van Jongeren. SDU/Vermande.Google Scholar
  30. Killias, M. (2001). Précis de Criminologie, 2ème édition. Berne: Stämpfli.Google Scholar
  31. Klein, M. W. (1994). Epilogue. In J. Junger-Tas, G.-J. Terlouw, & M. W. Klein (Eds.), Delinquent behavior among young people in the western world—first results of the international self-report delinquency study. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Kornhauser, R. R. (1978). Social sources of delinquency. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. LaFree, G. (1998). Losing legitimacy-street crime and the decline of social institutions in America. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  34. Leibfried, S. (1992). Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European community. In Z. Ferge & J. E. Kolberg (Eds.), Social policy in a changing Europe (pp. 245–289). Frankfurt an Main: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  35. Loeber, R. (1991). Antisocial behavior: More enduring than changeable? American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30(3), 393–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marshall, I. H. (1996). How exceptional is the United States? Crime trends in Europe and the United States. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 4, 4–34.Google Scholar
  37. Marshall, I. H. (1997). Minorities, migrants and crime: Diversity and similarity across Europe and the United States. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Maxfield, G., & Babbie, E. (2001). Research methods for criminal justice and criminology (3rd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  39. Mayhew, P., & van Dijk, J. J. M. (1997). Criminal victimisation in eleven industrialised countries: Key findings from the 1996 international crime survey. Den Haag: Ministerie van Justitie.Google Scholar
  40. Moffit, T. E. (1990). Juvenile delinquency and attention-deficit disorder: Developmental trajectories from age three to fifteen. Child Development, 61, 893–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moffit, T. E. (1993), ‘Life course persistent’ and ‘adolescence limited’ antisocial behaviour: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 647–701.Google Scholar
  42. Olweus, D. (1979). Stability of aggressive reaction patterns in males: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 86 (4), 852–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Olweus, D. (1996). Bully/victim problems at school: facts and effective interventions. Reclaiming Children and Youth: Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Problems, 5(1), 15–20.Google Scholar
  44. Pease, K., & Hukkula, K. (Eds.) (1990). Criminal justice systems in Europe and North-America. Helsinki: Helsinki Institute for Crime Prevention and Control.Google Scholar
  45. Pratt, Tr. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Raudenbusch, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models—applications and data analysis methods. Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Rutter, M., & Giller, H. (1983). Juvenile delinquency, trends and perspectives. Middlesex, Penguin: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  48. Saint-Arnaud, S., & Bernard, P. (2003). Convergence or resilience? A hierarchical cluster analysis of the welfare regimes in advanced countries. Current Sociology, 51, 499–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. (1993). Crime in the making—pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Sampson, R. J., en Raudenbusch, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 914–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sampson, R. J., en Morenoff, J. D., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime, criminal justice 2000 series, vol. 4 (pp. 33–83). Washington: US National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  53. van Dijk, J. J. M., & Mayhew, P. (1992). Criminal victimisation in the industrialised world: Key findings of the 1989 and 1992 international crime surveys. Den Haag: Ministerie van Justitie.Google Scholar
  54. van Dijk, J. J. M., & Steinmetz, C. H. D. (1983). Victimisation surveys: Beyond measuring the volume of crime. Victimology: An International Journal, 8, 291–301.Google Scholar
  55. van Dijk, J. J. M., & Steinmetz, C. H. D. (1988). Pragmatism, ideology and crime control: Three Dutch surveys. In N. Walker & M. Hough (Eds.), Public attitudes to sentencing. Aldeshot: Gower.Google Scholar
  56. van Dijk, J. J. M., Mayhew, P., & Killias, M. (1990). Experiences of crime across the world. Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation.Google Scholar
  57. van Dijk, J. J. M., en Manchin, R., & van Kesteren, J. N. (2007). The burden of crime in the EU—a comparative analysis of the European survey of crime and safety (EUICS) 2005. Brussels: Gallup-Europe.Google Scholar
  58. van Hulst, H., & Bos, J. (1993). Criminaliteit van geïmmigreerde Curaçaose jongeren. Utrecht: Onderzoek Collectief Utrecht.Google Scholar
  59. van Kesteren, J. N., Mayhew, P., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2000). Criminal victimisation in seventeen industrialized countries: Key findings from the 2000 international crime survey. Den Haag: Ministerie van Justitie.Google Scholar
  60. Vetere, E., & Newman, G. (1977). International crime statistics: An overview from a comparative perspective. Abstracts on Criminology and Penology, 17, 251–604.Google Scholar
  61. Wikström, P.-O. (1998). Communities and crime. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 269–302). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level—why more equal societies almost always do better. New York: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  63. Zhang, S., Benson, Th, & Deng, X. (2000). A test-retest reliability assessment of the international self-report delinquency instrument. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zvekic, U., & Alvazzi del Frate, A. (1995). Criminal victimisation in the developing world. UNICRI, UN publ. nr. 55, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Penal Law and CriminologyUniversity of UtrechtBilthovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations