Advertisement

Modelling Criminal Justice System Costs by Offence

Lessons from The Netherlands
  • Debora E. G. MoolenaarEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper illustrates how to estimate criminal justice system costs by offence type. Criminal justice system costs are all the costs the authorities incur to prevent and investigate crime, prosecute criminals, impose sentences, and take care of victims and offenders. There are two approaches: the break-down and the bottom-up approaches. The break-down approach decomposes the aggregate budget into smaller pieces. The bottom-up approach multiplies known costs per activity by volumes for each activity and offence type. Both approaches can be combined with two types of estimates: incidence-based and prevalence-based estimates. An incidence-based estimate identifies all costs attributable to crimes committed or processed in a specified period regardless of whether these costs exceed this time period. A prevalence-based estimate identifies all costs incurred in a specified period regardless of when the crime was committed or processed. This paper looks at the differences between the two approaches and the two estimates and indicates which combination works best depending on the type of analysis and the availability of data. The methodologies are illustrated using examples from The Netherlands. These examples show that the availability of reliable data is crucial. The more assumptions have to be made, the less reliable the end results. Investing in better data in this area should be a first priority for governments interested in criminal policy evaluation.

Keywords

Costs Crime Criminal justice system (CJS) Criminal policy Evaluation Analysis Costing methodology Netherlands 

References

  1. Aebi, M. F., Aromaa, K., Aubusson de Cavarlay, B., Barclay, G., Gruszczyñska, B., von Hofer, H., et al. (2006). European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics — 2006 third edition. The Hague: Boom Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. A. (1999). The Aggregate Burden of Crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 42, 611–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brand, S., & Price, R. (2000). The economic and social costs of crime. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, M., Miller, T. R., & Rossman S. B. (1994). The Costs and Consequences of Violent Behaviour in the US. In: J. A. Reiss, & J. A. Roth (eds), Understanding and Preventing Violence: Consequences and Control of Violence. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 4:90.Google Scholar
  5. Dubourg, R., Hamed, J., Thorns, J., et al. (2005). The economic and social costs of crime against individuals and households 2003/04. London: Home Office, On-Line Report 30.Google Scholar
  6. Groot, I., De Hoop, T., Houkes, A., & Sikkel, D. (2007). De kosten van criminaliteit: een onderzoek naar de kosten van criminaliteit voor tien verschillende delicttypen (The costs of crime: a research into the costs of crime for ten different types of crime). Amsterdam: SEO.Google Scholar
  7. Ministry of General Affairs. (2007). Samen werken samen leven, beleidsprogramma Kabinet Balkenende IV 2007–2011 (Working together, living together, government program 2007–2011), The Hague.Google Scholar
  8. Moolenaar, D. E. G. (2008). Jaarlijkse kosten van criminaliteit (Annual costs of crime). In A. Th, J. Eggen & S. N. Kalidien (Eds.), Criminaliteit en Rechtshandhaving 2007 (Crime and law and order 2007). Boom Legal Publishers: The Hague.Google Scholar
  9. Van Dijk, J. J. M., Van Kesteren, J. N., & Smit, P. (2008). Criminal Victimisation in International Perspective, Key findings from the 2004–2005 ICVS and EU ICS. The Hague: Boom Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Van Laar, M., Cruts, G., Van Gageldonk, A., Croes, E., Van Ooyen-Houben, M., Meijer, R., et al. (2009). Drug situation 2009 — the Netherlands; Report to the EMCDDA. Utrecht: WODC/ Trimbos Instituut/EMCDDA.Google Scholar
  11. Van Velthoven, B. C. J., & Moolenaar, D. E. G. (2009). Loont de SOV/ISD-maatregel? Een eerste verkenning? (Does the SOV/ISD-measure pay off? A first exploration). Justitiële Verkenningen, 35(2), 31–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research and Documentation Centre (WODC)Ministry of JusticeThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations