Advertisement

Once a Criminal, Always a Criminal?: ‘Redeemability’ and the Psychology of Punitive Public Attitudes

  • Shadd Maruna
  • Anna King
Article

Abstract

Several studies have sought to link punitive public attitudes to attribution style and/or lay theories of crime. This research finds that those who believe criminal acts are the result of freely chosen and willful behavior are more likely to be punitive than those who feel crime is the result of external circumstances and constraints. These analyses focus on only one dimension of attributions: locus of control (internal/external). In this analysis, we include a second dimension, thought to be a better predictor of attitudes in social psychological research: stability/instability. In addition to measuring lay theories of crime causation, we also test for “belief in redeemability” (or beliefs about the ability of deviants to change their ways). Our hypothesis is that this other dimension of personal attributions (stability/instability) may be as critical in explaining support for highly punitive criminal justice policies as beliefs about criminal responsibility. We find evidence supportive of this model in an analysis of data from postal survey of residents of six areas in England.

Keywords

Attribution theory Public opinion Punitiveness Redemption Reentry 

References

  1. Allen, R. (2002). What do the public really feel about non-custodial penalties? London: Esmee Fairbairn Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, R., & Hough, M. (2007). Community penalties, sentencers, the media and public opinion. In L. Gelsthorpre, & R. Morgan (Eds.), Handbook on probation (pp. 565–601). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, R. E., & Serpe, R. T. (2000). Social integration, fear of crime, and life satisfaction. Sociological Perspectives, 43(4), 605.Google Scholar
  4. Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F. T., & Fisher, B. S. (1997). Public support for correctional treatment: the continuing appeal of the rehabilitative ideal. The Prison Journal, 77, 237–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F. T., Fisher, B. S., & Vander Ven, T. (2000). Forgiveness and fundamentalism: reconsidering the relationship between correctional attitudes and religion. Criminology, 38, 719–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F. T., & Fisher, B. S. (2002). Public views toward crime and correctional policies is there a gender gap? Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(2), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baron, S., & Hartnagel, T. (1996). Lock ‘em up”: attitudes toward punishing juvenile offenders. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 38(2), 191–212.Google Scholar
  8. Betancourt, H., & Blair, I. (1992). A cognition (attribution)-emotion model of violence in conflict situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bottoms, A. (1995). The politics of sentencing reform. The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing. C. Clarkson and R. Morgan pp. 17–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brickman, P. (1982). Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist, 37(4), 368–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, J. S., & Payne, J. W. (1977). Crime seriousness, recidivism risk and causal attributions in judgments of prison term by students and experts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 595–602.Google Scholar
  12. Carroll, J. S., Perkowitz, W. T., Lurigo, A. J., & Weaver, F. M. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiricos, T., Welch, K., & Geitz, M. (2004). Racial typification of crime and support for punitive measures. Criminology, 42, 359–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiu, C.-y., C. S. Dweck, Fu. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 923–940.Google Scholar
  15. Cullen, F. T., Golden, K. M., & Cullen, J. B. (1983). Is child saving dead? Juvenile rehabilitation in Illinois. Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cullen, F., Clark, G., Cullen, J., & Mathers, R. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 305–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cullen, F. T., Skovron, S. E., Scott, J. E., & Burton Jr., V. S. (1990). Public support for correctional treatment: the tenacity of rehabilitative ideology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Darley, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1982). Making moral judgments. American Scientist, 70, 515–522.Google Scholar
  19. Davis, T. L., Severy, L. J., Kraus, S. J., & Whitaker, J. M. (1993). Predictors of sentencing decisions: the beliefs, personality variables, and demographic factors of juvenile justice personnel. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 451–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Demski, R. M., & McGlynn, R. P. (1999). Fear or moral indignation? Predicting attitudes toward parolees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(10), 2024–2058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duffee, D., & Ritti, R. R. (1977). Correctional policy and public values. Criminology, 14(4), 449–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, El. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(22), 256–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: a world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Evans, T. D., & Adams, M. (2003). Religion and punitive correctional attitudes. Journal of Crime and Justice, 28(1).Google Scholar
  25. Ellsworth, P. C., & Gross, S. R. (1994). Hardening of the attitudes: Americans’ views on the death penalty. Journal of Social Issues, 50(2), 19–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flanagan, T. (1996). Reform or punish: Americans’ views on the correctional system. In T. Flanagan, & D. R. Longmire (Eds.), Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Fletcher, J. F. (1966). Situation ethics: The new morality. Westminster John Knox Publishers, 176 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gault, B. A., & Sabini, J. (2000). The roles of empathy, anger, and gender in predicting attitudes toward punitive, reparative, and preventative public policies. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giacopassi, D. J. & Blankenship, M. B. (1991) The effects of criminal justice pedagogy on student attitudes. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graham, S., Hudley, C., & Williams, E. (1992). Attributional and emotional determinants of aggression among African-American and Latino young adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 28, 731–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Graham, S., Weiner, B., et al. (1997). An attributional analysis of punishment goals and public reactions to O.J. Simpson. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(1), 33.Google Scholar
  33. Grasmick, H., & McGill, A. (1994). Religion, attribution style, and punitiveness toward juvenile offenders. Criminology, 32, 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haghighi, B., & Lopez, A. (1998). Gender and perception of prisons and prisoners. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(6), 453–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hawkins, D. F. (1981). Causal attribution and punishment for crime. Deviant Behavior, 2, 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Helfgott, J. (1997). Ex-offender needs versus community opportunity in Seattle, Washington. Federal Probation, 61, 12–24.Google Scholar
  38. Hirschfield, A., & Piquero, A. (2008). Normalization and deligitimation: Modeling stigmatizing attitudes toward ex-offenders. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  39. Hogan, M., Chiricos, T. & Gertz, M. (2005). Economic insecurity, blame, and punitive attitudes. Justice Quarterly, 22, 392–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hogarth, J. (1971). Sentencing as a human process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  41. Homant, R. J., & Kennedy, D. B. (1982). Attitudes toward ex-offenders: a comparison of social stigmas. Journal of Criminal Justice, 10(5), 383–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hough, M., & Roberts, J. (1998). Attitudes to crime and punishment: findings from the 1996 British Crime Survey, Research Findings, No.64. London, Home Office, Development and Statistics Directorate: 1–4.Google Scholar
  43. Hough, M., & Roberts, J. (2002). Public knowledge and public opinion of sentencing. In Sentencing and Society: International Perspectives. (Eds.), Cyrus Tata and Neil Hutton, Aldershot Hamshire: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1997). Public perceptions of race and crime: the role of racial stereotypes. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jayewardene, C. H. S., Lang, S. & Gainer, C. (1977) Changing attitudes to the criminal justice system through formal education. Crime and Justice, 5, 126–130.Google Scholar
  46. Jacobs, D., & Carmichael, J. T. (2002). The political sociology of the death penalty: a pooled time-series analysis. American Sociological Review, 67, 109–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 2, (pp. 219–266)). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, (Ed.), D. Levine, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  50. King, A. (2008). Keeping a safe distance: individualism and the less punitive public. British Journal of Criminology, 48, 190–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. King, R. D., & Wheelock, D. (2007). Group threat and social control: race, perceptions of minorities and the desire to punish. Social Forces, 85(3), 1255–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. King, A., & Maruna, S. (2008). ‘Is a conservative just a liberal who has been mugged?: Exploring the origins of punitive views.’ Punishment and Society (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  53. Kjelsberg, E., Skoglund, T. H., & Rustad, A.-B. (2007). Attitudes toward prisoners, as reported by prison inmates, prison employees and college students. BMC Public Health, 7, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Berent, M. K., Carson, R. T., Hanemann, W. M., Kopp, R. J., et al. (2002). The impact of "no opinion" response options on data quality: non attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice? Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 371–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Langworthy, R. H., & Whitehead, J. T. (1986). Liberalism and fear as explanations of punitiveness. Criminology, 24, 575–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lerner, J., Goldberg, J., & Tetlock, P. (1998). Sober second thought: the effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 563–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lieber, M. J., & Woodrick, A. C. (1997). Religious beliefs, attributional styles, and adherence to correctional orientation. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 24, 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lurigio, A. J., Carroll, J. S., & Stalans, L. J. (1994). Understanding judges’ sentencing decisions: Attributions of responsibility and story construction. In L. Heath, et al. (Ed.), Applications of heuristics and biases to social issues (pp. 91–115). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  59. Maruna, S., & King, A. (2004). Public opinion and community penalties. In A. Bottoms, S. Rex, & G. Robinson (Eds.), Alternatives to prison: Options for an insecure society (pp. 83–112). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Martinson, J., & Mirrlees-Black, C. (2000a). Attitudes to crime and criminal justice: Findings from the British Crime Survey, Research Findings No 111.Google Scholar
  61. Mattinson, J., & Mirrlees-Black, C. (2000b). Attitudes to crime and criminal justice: Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey, Research Studies, No. 200. London, HMSO: 122.Google Scholar
  62. Mayhew, P. & Van Kesteren, J. (2002) Cross-national attitudes to punishment, pp. 63–92 in Changing attitudes to punishment: public opinion, crime and justice, edited by M. Hough. Collumpton, Devon: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. McCorkle, R. C. (1993). Research Note: punish and rehabilitate? Public attitudes toward six common crimes. Crime & Delinquency, 39(2), 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Moffitt, T. E. (1993), Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nettler, G. (1959). Cruelty, dignity, and determinism. American Sociological Review, 24, 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pellegrini, R. J., Queirolo, S. S., Monarrez, V. E., & Valenzuela, D. M. (1997). Political identification and perceptions of homelessness: Attributed causality and attitudes on public policy. Psychological Reports, 80, 1139–1148.Google Scholar
  67. Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist, 55, 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Quigley, B., & Tedeschi, J. (1996). Mediating effects of blame attributions on feelings of anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1280–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Roberts, J., & Hough, M. (2002). Changing attitudes to punishment: Public opinion, crime and justice. Cullompton, UK: Willan.Google Scholar
  70. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80.Google Scholar
  71. Sasson, T. (1995). Crime talk: how citizens construct a social problem. NY: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  72. Scheingold, S. A. (1984). The politics of law and order: Street crime and public policy. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  73. Schwartz, I. M. (1992). Combatting juvenile crime: What the public really wants. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Study of Youth Policy, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  74. Sears, D. O., & Funk, C. L. (1990). The limited effect of economic self-interest on the political attitudes of the mass public. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(3), 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shaver, K. G. (1975). An introduction to attribution processes. Cambridge. Mass: Winthrop.Google Scholar
  76. Shaw, M. E., & Sulzer, J. L. (1964). An empirical test of Heider’s levels in attribution of responsibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sims, B. (2003). The impact of causal attribution on correctional ideology: a national study. Criminal Justice Review, 28, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stack, S. (2003). Authoritarianism and support for the death penalty: a multivariate analysis. Sociological Focus, 36, 333–352.Google Scholar
  79. Steffensmeier, D. J., & Kramer, J. H. (1980). The differential impact of criminal stigmatization on male and female felons. Sex Roles, 6(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stinchcombe, A., Adams, R., Heimer, C., Scheppele, K. L., Smith, T., & Taylor, D. G. (1980). Crime and punishment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  81. Stitka, L. J. (2002). Do the means always justify the ends, or do the ends sometimes justify the means? A value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 588–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stroessner, S. J., & Green, C. W. (1990). Effects of belief in free will or determinism on attitudes toward punishment and locus of control. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 789–799.Google Scholar
  83. Struthers, C. W., & Perry, R. P. (1996). Attributional style, attributional retraining, and inoculation against motivational deficits. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Taylor, D. G., Scheppele, K. L., & Stinchcombe, A. L. (1979). Salience of crime and support for harsher criminal sanctions. Social Problems, 26(4), 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Templeton, L. J. & T. F. Hartnagel (2008). Causal attributions of crime and the public’s punishment goals. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  86. Tyler, T. R., & Boeckmann, R. J. (1997). Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law & Society Review, 31, 237–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Unnever, J. D., Cullen, F. T., & Fisher, B. S. (2007). A liberal is someone who has not been mugged: criminal victimization and political beliefs. Justice Quarterly, 24(2), 309–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Van Overwalle, F., Segebarth, K., & Goldchstein, M. (1989). Improving performance of freshmen through attributional testimonies from fellow students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 75–85.Google Scholar
  89. Wood, J., & Viki, G. T. (2004). Public attitudes towards crime and punishment. In J. Adler (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Debates, concepts and practice. Cullompton, UK: Willan.Google Scholar
  90. Viney, W., Waldman, D., & Barchilon, J. (1982). Attitudes toward punishment in relation to belief in free will and determinism. Human Relations, 35, 939–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. von Hirsch, A. (1993). Censure and Sanctions. NY, Oxford: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Walker, N., Hough M., & Lewis H. (1988). Tolerance of leniency and severity. Tolerance of Leniency and Severity in England and Wales. In Public Attitudes to Sentencing. (Eds.), Nigel Walker and Mike Hough, Avebury Publishing Co., pp. 178–202.Google Scholar
  93. Warr, M. (1980). The accuracy of public beliefs about crime. Social Forces, 59(2), 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Weiner, B., & S. Graham (1999). Attribution in personality psychology. Handbook of personality: theory and research. L. A. Pervin and O. P. John. NY/ London: The Guilford Press: 738.Google Scholar
  96. Wilson, T. D., & Linville, P. W. (1982). Improving the performance of college freshmen: attributional theory revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wilson, T. D., & Linville, P. W. (1985). Improving the performance of college freshmen with attributional techniques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 287–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Young, R. L. (1991). Race, conceptions of crime and justice, and support for the death penalty. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Criminology and Criminal Justice, School of LawQueen’s University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Rutgers’s UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations