Advertisement

Processes Explaining the Concealment and Distortion of Evidence on Gender Symmetry in Partner Violence

  • Murray A. Straus
Article

Graham-Kevan’s paper fully documents overwhelming evidence that the “patriarchal dominance” theory of partner violence (PV from here on) explains only a small part of PV. Moreover, more such evidence is rapidly emerging. To take just one recent example, analyses of data from 32 nations in the International Dating Violence Study (Straus 2006; Straus and International Dating Violence Research Consortium 2004) found about equal perpetration rates and a predominance of mutual violence in all 32 samples, including non-Western nations. Moreover, data from that study also show that, within a couple relationship, domination and control by women occur as often as by men and are as strongly associated with perpetration of PV by women as by men (Straus 2006). Graham-Kevan also documents the absence of evidence indicating that the patriarchal dominance approach to prevention and treatment has been effective. In my opinion, it would be even more appropriate to say that what success has been...

Keywords

Domestic violence Feminism Scientifc bias 

References

  1. Black, D. (1983). Crime as social-control. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. DeKeseredy, W. S., Saunders, D. G., Schwartz, M. D., & Shahid, A. (1997). The meanings and motives for women's use of violence in Canadian college dating relationships: Results from a National Survey. Sociological Spectrum, 17, 199–222.Google Scholar
  3. Durose, M. R., Wolf Harlow, C., Langan, P. A., Motivans, M., Rantala, R. R., & Smith, E. L. (2005). Family violence statistics including statistics on strangers and acquaintances (No. NCJ 207846). Washington, DC.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of justice Programs, Bureau of Justic Statistics.Google Scholar
  4. Feld, S. L., & Straus, M. A. (1989). Escalation and desistance of wife assault in marriage. Criminology, 27(1), 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gelles, R. J. (1980). Violence in the family: A review of research in the seventies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 873–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Giles-Sims, J. (1983). Wife battering: A systems theory approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hamel, J., & Nicholls, T. (Eds.). (2006). Family approaches in domestic violence: A practitioner’s guide to gender-inclusive research and treatment: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2005). Female perpetration of physical aggression against an intimate partner: A controversial new topic of study. Violence and Victims, 20(2), 251–259.Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, H., & Sacco, V. F. (1995). Researching violence against women: Statistics canada’s national survey. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 281–304, July.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990's: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 948–963.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, M. P., & Leone, J. M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence - findings from the national violence against women survey. Journal Of Family Issues, 26(3), 322–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaufman Kantor, G., & Straus, M. A. (1987). The drunken bum theory of wife beating. Social Problems, 34, 213–230.Google Scholar
  13. Kennedy, L. W., & Dutton, D. G. (1989). The incidence of wife assault in alberta. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 21(1), 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kernsmith, P. (2005). Exerting power or striking back: A gendered comparison of motivations for domestic violence perpetration. Victims and Violence, 20(2), 173–185.Google Scholar
  15. Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., Lozano, R., & World Health Organization. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  16. Lackey, C., & Williams, K. R. (1995). Social bonding and the cessation of partner violence across generations. Journal of Marriage and the family, 57, 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lupri, E. (2004). Institutional resistance to acknowledging intimate male abuse, Counter-Roundtable Conference on Domestic Violence. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
  18. Medeiros, R. A., & Straus, M. A. (2006). Risk factors for physical violence between dating partners: Implications for gender-inclusive prevention and treatment of family violence. In J. C. Hamel & T. Nicholls (Eds.), Family approaches to domestic violence: A practioners guide to gender-inclusive research and treatment. Springer (also available at http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2).
  19. Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband-abuse or self-defense? Violence and Victims, 1(1), 47–60.Google Scholar
  20. Schulman, M. (1979). A survey of spousal violence aqainst women in Kentucky. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  21. Steinmetz, S. K. (1977). The cycle of violence: Assertive, aggressive, and abusive family interaction. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  22. Steinmetz, S. K. (1977–1978). The battered husband syndrome. Victimology, 2, 499–509.Google Scholar
  23. Straus, M. A. (1999). The controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical, and sociology of science analysis. In X. Arriaga & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 17–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Straus, M. A. (2006). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Paper presented at the Trends in intimate violence intervention conference, New York University, 23 May.Google Scholar
  25. Straus, M. A., & International Dating Violence Research Consortium. (2004). Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women, 10(7), 790–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Straus, M. A., & Scott, K. (In press). Gender symmetry in partner violence: The evidence, the denial, and the implications for primary prevention and treatment. In J. R. Lutzker & D. J. Whitaker (Eds.), Prevention of partner violence. Washington D.C. : American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  27. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283--316.Google Scholar
  28. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the national violence against women survey (No. NCJ 183781). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Family Research LaboratoryUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations