Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing Mindfulness and Positivity Trainings in High-Demand Cohorts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attention and working memory are at risk of degradation over intensive intervals in groups engaged in highly demanding jobs. Accordingly, there is great interest in identifying training regimes to promote cognitive resilience in such populations. Herein, US Army Soldiers were assigned to either an 8-week, 16-h mindfulness training (MT) program (n = 40) or to a well-matched active comparison program involving positivity training (PT, n = 40), during an intensive interval of predeployment training. Working memory (WM) and sustained attention task performance, as well as self-reported positive and negative trait affect, were assessed at study onset (T1) and at the end of the MT/PT program interval (T2). Positive and negative trait affect did not change over time or differ across training groups. Yet, overall decline in cognitive task performance was observed from T1 to T2. Importantly, the MT group demonstrated significantly less decline in cognitive task performance relative to the PT group, suggesting better protection from cognitive degradation over time. Based on these results, we argue that MT should be further explored as a cognitive resilience-building tool in high-demand cohorts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although it was not an outcome measure of central interest, we examined mean reaction time of correct trials for completeness. Response times for correct trials were slower over time, F(1, 66) = 5.80, p = .019, but did not differ among groups, F(1, 78) = 1.99, p = .162, and there was no significant interaction of time and group, F(1, 66) = 2.20, p = .142.

  2. We also examined mean reaction time of correct non-target trials for completeness. Response times for non-target trials did not change over time, F(1, 63) = 2.16, p = .147, did not differ among groups, F(1, 77) = 0.01, p = .966, and there was no significant interaction of time and group, F(1, 63) = 2.27, p = .137.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Lieutenant General Walter Piatt for his invaluable support of this project, as well as Dr. Sara Algoe and John Schaldach for their assistance with training delivery, and Nina Rostrup, Toby Elliman, and Brian Lakey for their assistance with data collection.

Funding

This research was supported by Dept. of Army Grant #W81XWH-11-2-0124 to APJ.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amishi P. Jha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

EAS is the developer and copyright holder of Mindfulness-Based Mind Fitness Training (MMFT)®. APJ, APZ, ED, JR, and ABM declare they have no potential conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Miami and other author-affiliated universities, with oversight from the Human Research Protections Office of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).

Informed Consent

All participants provided informed consent.

Animal Rights

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jha, A.P., Zanesco, A.P., Denkova, E. et al. Comparing Mindfulness and Positivity Trainings in High-Demand Cohorts. Cogn Ther Res 44, 311–326 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10076-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10076-6

Keywords

Navigation