A Brief Worry Reappraisal Paradigm (REAP) Increases Coping with Worries
The current study examined a novel computerized cognitive reappraisal paradigm (REAP) for worry management in college-aged adults with a range of PSWQ scores (n = 98). Participants listed three current worries and were randomized to either REAP or a worry condition. For the REAP condition, participants selected positive reappraisal statements of their worries over negative ones. Before and after completing the reappraisal or worry task, participants discussed each worry. Participants rated their worries on coping ability, distress, and probability the worry would materialize. Relative to worry, the REAP group rated an increase in ability to cope with their worries whereas the results failed to provide evidence for a similar increase among the worry group. If similar findings emerge in clinical populations, REAP may eventually serve as a useful tool in augmenting cognitive behavioral therapy protocols.
KeywordsCognitive reappraisal Computerized reappraisal Cognitive therapy Worry Cognitive behavioral therapy
This research was supported by Northwestern University’s Graduate Research Grant (GRG). Nehjla M. Mashal was supported by the VA Advanced Fellowship Program in Mental Health Research and Treatment, Office of Academic Affiliations; writing of this manuscript was supported in part by the Sierra Pacific MIRECC at the VA Palo Alto Health Care System.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Nehjla M. Mashal, Sherry A. Beaudreau, Michael A. Hernandez, Rachel Cackler Duller, Holly Romaniak, Ki Eun Shin, Ken A. Paller, and Richard E. Zinbarg declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed involving human participants in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional Review Board (IRB) at Northwestern University, Evanston Campus and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). DSM 5. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Ball, S. (1995). Anxiety and test performance. In C. D. Spielberger & P. R. Vagg (Eds.), Series in Clinical and Community Psychology. Test Anxiety: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment (pp. 107-113). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Borkovec, T. D., & Whisman, M. A. (1996). Psychosocial treatment for generalized anxiety disorder. In M. R. Mavissakalian & R. F. Prien (Eds.), Longterm treatments of anxiety disorders (pp. 171–199). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Goldin, P. R., Ziv, M., Jazaieri, H., Werner, K., Kraemer, H., Heimberg, R. G., et al. (2012). Cognitive reappraisal self-efficacy mediates the effects of individual cognitive-behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,80(6), 1034.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jarvis, B. G. (2012). DirectRT (Version 2012) [Computer Software]. New York, NY: Empirisoft Corporation.Google Scholar
- Kazantzis, N., Whittington, C., & Dattilio, F. (2010). Meta-analysis of homework effects in cognitive and behavioral therapy: A replication and extension. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice,17(2), 144–156.Google Scholar
- Molina, S., & Borkovec, T. D. (1994). The Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and associated characteristics. In G. C. L. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Wiley series in clinical psychology. Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 265–283). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Resick, P. A., Monson, C. M., & Chard, K. M. (2006). Cognitive processing therapy: Veteran/military version. Clinical Psychology,74, 898–907.Google Scholar
- Ruscio, A. M., Seitchik, A. E., Gentes, E. L., Jones, J. D., & Hallion, L. S. (2011). Perseverative thought: A robust predictor of response to emotional challenge in generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy,49(12), 867–874.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar