Advertisement

Reactivation and Evaluation of Mastery Experiences Promotes Exposure Benefit in Height Phobia

  • Friederike Raeder
  • Marcella L. Woud
  • Silvia Schneider
  • Christina Totzeck
  • Dirk Adolph
  • Jürgen Margraf
  • Armin ZlomuzicaEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The retrieval of personal mastery experiences has been linked to adaptive functions, such as increased perceived self-efficacy and coping capability. Successful exposure leads to an increased mastery experience with respect to anxiety provoking situations, possibly due to a violation of expected negative outcomes. We investigated whether the reactivation and evaluation of mastery experiences after a brief virtual reality exposure (VRE) training can enhance self-efficacy and promote exposure therapy benefit in patients with acrophobia. Acrophobic participants (N = 56) were randomly assigned to a memory reactivation and evaluation (= VRE–MRE) intervention, a control (= memory reactivation; VRE–MR), or no intervention (= VRE) after VRE. The VRE–MRE condition involved the evaluation of mastery experiences associated with exposure and related events from the past. The effects of the VRE–MRE intervention were assessed on the level of behavioral avoidance and subjective fear at post-treatment and one-month follow-up. Relative to both the VRE–MR and VRE conditions, the VRE–MRE group showed an increase in self-efficacy and exhibited more pronounced reductions in behavioral avoidance, subjective fear at the initial approach distance, as well as scores on the acrophobia questionnaire (AQ) from pre- to post-treatment. The superior effects of the VRE–MRE intervention remained evident on the level of behavioral avoidance and associated subjective fear at the initial approach distance, but not on the AQ, from pre-treatment to follow-up. These findings indicate that the reactivation and evaluation of mastery experiences could be used as a strategy to increase exposure-based therapy in anxiety disorders.

Keywords

Acrophobia Extinction Exposure Self-efficacy Virtual reality 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - Projektnummer 316803389 - SFB1280 (Project A13 awarded to A.Z. and J.M). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, manuscript preparation and decision to publish.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Friederike Raeder, Marcella L. Woud, Silvia Schneider, Christina Totzeck, Dirk Adolph, Jürgen Margraf, and Armin Zlomuzica declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research Involving Human Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Animal Rights

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Supplementary material

10608_2019_10018_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)

References

  1. Borkovec, T. D., & Nau, S. D. (1972). Credibility of analogue therapy rationales. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 3, 257–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breeden, P., Dere, D., Zlomuzica, A., & Dere, E. (2016). The mental time travel continuum: On the architecture, capacity, versatility and extension of the mental bridge into the past and future. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 27, 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, A. D., Dorfman, M. L., Marmar, C. R., & Bryant, R. A. (2012). The impact of perceived self-efficacy on mental time travel and social problem solving. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, A. D., Kouri, N. A., Rahman, N., Joscelyne, A., Bryant, R. A., & Marmar, C. R. (2016). Enhancing self-efficacy improves episodic future thinking and social-decision making in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatry Research, 242, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, L. A., Wiley, J. F., Wolitzky-Taylor, K., Roy-Byrne, P., Sherbourne, C., Stein, M. B., et al. (2014). Changes in self-efficacy and outcome expectancy as predictors of anxiety outcomes from the CALM study. Depression and Anxiety, 31, 678–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., & Beck, A. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carl, J. R., Soskin, D. P., Kerns, C., & Barlow, D. H. (2013). Positive emotion regulation in emotional disorders: A theoretical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coelho, C. M., Waters, A. M., Hine, T. J., & Wallis, G. (2009). The use of virtual reality in acrophobia research and treatment. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 563–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, D. C. (1977). Comparison of self-report and overt-behavioral procedures for assessing acrophobia. Behavior Therapy, 8, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Craske, M. G., Hermans, D., & Vervliet, B. (2018). State-of-the-art and future directions for extinction as a translational model for fear and anxiety (p. 373). Biological Sciences: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.Google Scholar
  11. Craske, M. G., & Mystkowski, J. (2006). Exposure therapy and extinction: Clinical studies. In M. G. Craske, D. Hermans, & D. Vansteenwegen (Eds.), Fear and learning: From basic processes to clinical implications (pp. 217–233). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Craske, M. G., Treanor, M., Conway, C. C., Zbozinek, T., & Vervliet, B. (2014). Maximizing exposure therapy: An inhibitory learning approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 58, 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Quervain, D. J.-F., Bentz, D., Michael, T., Bolt, O. C., Wiederhold, B. K., Margraf, J., et al. (2011). Glucocorticoids enhance extinction-based psychotherapy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 6621–6625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dere, E., Dere, D., de Souza Silva, M. A., Huston, J. P., & Zlomuzica, A. (2018). Fellow travellers: Working memory and mental time travel in rodents. Behavioural Brain Research, 352, 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Durham, R. C., Higgins, C., Chambers, J. A., Swan, J. S., & Dow, M. G. T. (2012). Long-term outcome of eight clinical trials of CBT for anxiety disorders: Symptom profile of sustained recovery and treatment-resistant groups. Journal of Affective Disorders, 136, 875–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Emmelkamp, P. M., Krijn, M., Hulsbosch, A. M., de Vries, S., Schuemie, M. J., & van der Mast, C. A. (2002). Virtual reality treatment versus exposure in vivo: A comparative evaluation in acrophobia. Behaviour Reseach and Therapy, 40, 509–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallagher, M. W., Payne, L. A., White, K. S., Shear, K. M., Woods, S. W., Gorman, J. M., et al. (2013). Mechanisms of change in cognitive behavioral therapy for panic disorder: The unique effects of self-efficacy and anxiety sensitivity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51, 767–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldin, P. R., Ziv, M., Jazaieri, H., Werner, K., Kraemer, H., Heimberg, R. G., et al. (2012). Cognitive reappraisal self-efficacy mediates the effects of individual cognitive-behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hautzinger, M., Keller, F., & Kühner, C. (2006). Das Beck Depressions inventar II. Deutsche Bearbeitung und Handbuch zum BDI II. Frankfurt: Harcourt Test Services.Google Scholar
  20. Hofmann, S. G. (2007). Enhancing exposure-based therapy from a translational research perspective. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1987–2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1999). Skala zur Allgemeinen Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung (SWE). In R. Schwarzer & M. Jerusalem (Eds.), Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen. Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der Wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
  22. Kleim, B., Graham, B., Fihosy, S., Stott, R., & Ehlers, A. (2014). Reduced specificity in episodic future thinking in posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laux, L., Glanzmann, P., Schaffner, P., & Spielberger, C. (1981). Das State-Trait-Angstinventar. Theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung. Weinheim: Beltz Test GmbH.Google Scholar
  24. Lempert, K. M., Speer, M. E., Delgado, M. R., & Phelps, E. A. (2017). Positive autobiographical memory retrieval reduces temporal discounting. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12, 1584–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Margraf, J. (1994). Diagnostisches Kurzinterview bei psychischen Störungen [Diagnostic interview for mental disorders](Mini-DIPS). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Margraf, J., & Zlomuzica, A. (2015). Changing the future, not the past: A translational paradigm shift in treating anxiety. EMBO Reports, 16, 259–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morina, N., Bryant, R. A., Doolan, E. L., Martin-Solch, C., Plichta, M. M., Pfaltz, M. C., et al. (2017). The impact of enhancing perceived self-efficacy in torture survivors. Depression and Anxiety, 35, 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mystkowski, J. L., Craske, M. G., & Echiverri, A. M. (2002). Treatment context and return of fear in spider phobia. Behavior Therapy, 33, 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Norton, P. J., & Price, E. C. (2007). A meta-analytic review of adult cognitive-behavioral treatment outcome across the anxiety disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pause, B. M., Zlomuzica, A., Kinugawa, K., Mariani, J., Pietrowsky, R., & Dere, E. (2013). Perspectives on episodic-like and episodic memory. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Phan, K. L., Wager, T., Taylor, S. F., & Liberzon, I. (2002). Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: A meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage, 16, 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Preusser, F., Margraf, J., & Zlomuzica, A. (2017). Generalization of extinguished fear to untreated fear stimuli after exposure. Neuropsychopharmacology, 42, 2545–2552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raeder, F., Merz, C. J., Tegenthoff, M., Wolf, O. T., Margraf, J., & Zlomuzica, A. (2019). Post-exposure cortisol administration does not augment the success of exposure therapy: A randomized placebo-controlled study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 99, 174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rodriguez, B. I., Craske, M. G., Mineka, S., & Hladek, D. (1999). Context-specificity of relapse: Effects of therapist and environmental context on return of fear. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 845–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodriguez-Romaguera, J., Do Monte, F. H., & Quirk, G. J. (2012). Deep brain stimulation of the ventral striatum enhances extinction of conditioned fear. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 8764–8769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ruhmland, M., & Margraf, J. (2001). Effektivität psychologischer Therapien von spezifischer Phobie und Zwangsstörung: Meta-Analysen auf Störungsebene. Verhaltenstherapie, 11, 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schönfeld, P., Preusser, F., & Margraf, J. (2017). Costs and benefits of self-efficacy: Differences of the stress response and clinical implications. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 75, 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., & Regenbrecht, H. (2001). The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10, 266–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Speer, M. E., & Delgado, M. R. (2017). Reminiscing about positive memories buffers acute stress responses. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Titcombe-Parekh, R. F., Chen, J., Rahman, N., Kouri, N., Qian, M., Li, M., et al. (2018). Neural circuitry changes associated with increasing self-efficacy in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 104, 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vervliet, B., Craske, M. G., & Hermans, D. (2013). Fear extinction and relapse: State of the art. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 215–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams, S. L., Turner, S. M., & Peer, D. F. (1985). Guided mastery and performance desensitization treatments for severe acrophobia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams, S. L., & Watson, N. (1985). Perceived danger and perceived self-efficacy as cognitive determinants of acrophobic behavior. Behavior Therapy, 16, 136–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wolpe, J. (1973). The practice of behavior therapy. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  45. Zbozinek, T. D., Holmes, E. A., & Craske, M. G. (2015). The effect of positive mood induction on reducing reinstatement fear: Relevance for long term outcomes of exposure therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 71, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zlomuzica, A., Dere, D., Machulska, A., Adolph, D., Dere, E., & Margraf, J. (2014). Episodic memories in anxiety disorders: Clinical implications. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zlomuzica, A., Preusser, F., Schneider, S., & Margraf, J. (2015). Increased perceived self-efficacy facilitates the extinction of fear in healthy participants. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zlomuzica, A., Preusser, F., Totzeck, C., Dere, E., & Margraf, J. (2016). The impact of different emotional states on the memory for what, where and when features of specific events. Behavioural Brain Research, 298, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zlomuzica, A., Woud, M. L., Machulska, A., Kleimt, K., Dietrich, L., Wolf, O. T., et al. (2018). Deficits in episodic memory and mental time travel in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 83, 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Friederike Raeder
    • 1
  • Marcella L. Woud
    • 1
  • Silvia Schneider
    • 1
  • Christina Totzeck
    • 1
  • Dirk Adolph
    • 1
  • Jürgen Margraf
    • 1
  • Armin Zlomuzica
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Mental Health Research and Treatment CenterRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations