Main and Interactive Effects of e-Cigarette Use Health Literacy and Anxiety Sensitivity in Terms of e-Cigarette Perceptions and Dependence
Although e-cigarette use is on the rise, there is little understanding of cognitive-based individual difference factors that maintain maladaptive e-cigarette beliefs and dependence. The present investigation sought to test a theoretically-driven interactive model of e-cigarette health literacy and anxiety sensitivity (AS; fear of the consequences of anxiety) among 537 e-cigarette users (50.7% female, Mage = 35.2 years, SD = 10.1) in terms of perceived benefits and risks of e-cigarette use as well as dependence. Results indicated a significant interaction between e-cigarette health literacy and AS. The significant interaction effect for each dependent variable was evident over and above the main effects as well as the covariates of sex, income, education, and dual cigarette use (e-cigarette dependence was also controlled for the models of perceived benefits and risks). The form of this interaction indicated that greater e-cigarette health literacy was more strongly related to greater perceived benefits and risks of e-cigarette use as well as dependence among those with higher, relative to lower, AS. Overall, the current data suggest that individual differences in e-cigarette health literacy and AS may represent two important factors to consider in e-cigarette beliefs and dependence. This study provides the first empirical evidence of the potential role of two cognitive factors in relation to e-cigarette use beliefs and behavior. These data suggest future clinical research may benefit by understanding the potential therapeutic role of e-cigarette health literacy and AS for e-cigarette use behavior.
KeywordsAnxiety sensitivity e-Cigarettes Health literacy Tobacco Addiction Cognition
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of Interest
Michael J. Zvolensky, Nubia A. Mayorga, and Lorra Garey declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Research Involving Animal Participants
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
- Cummins, S. E., Zhu, S.-H., Tedeschi, G. J., Gamst, A. C., & Myers, M. G. (2014). Use of e-cigarettes by individuals with mental health conditions. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051511.Google Scholar
- Foulds, J., Veldheer, S., Yingst, J., Hrabovsky, S., Wilson, S. J., Nichols, T. T., & Eissenberg, T. (2015). Development of a questionnaire for assessing dependence on electronic cigarettes among a large sample of ex-smoking E-cigarette users. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 17(2), 186–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gilreath, T. D., Leventhal, A., Barrington-Trimis, J. L., Unger, J. B., Cruz, T. B., Berhane, K., … Howland, S. (2016). Patterns of alternative tobacco product use: Emergence of hookah and e-cigarettes as preferred products amongst youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58(2), 181–185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Johnson, K., Mullin, J. L., Marshall, E. C., Bonn-Miller, M. O., & Zvolensky, M. (2010). Exploring the mediational role of coping motives for marijuana use in terms of the relation between anxiety sensitivity and marijuana dependence. The American Journal on Addictions, 19(3), 277–282.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kutner, M., Greenburg, E., Jin, Y., & Paulsen, C. (2006). The health literacy of America’s adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. NCES 2006-483. Kensington, MD: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. (2018). Public health consequences of e-cigarettes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, S. (1999). Anxiety sensitivity: Theory, research, and treatment of the fear of anxiety. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
- Wilson, S., Foulds, J., Berg, A., & Chen, G. (2015). Examining the psychological and biological effects associated with the use of electronic cigarette devices. Retrieved from https://redcap.ctsi.psu.edu/surveys/?s=v94cbA.
- Zvolensky, M. J., Baker, K. M., Leen-Feldner, E., Bonn-Miller, M. O., Feldner, M. T., & Brown, R. A. (2004). Anxiety sensitivity: Association with intensity of retrospectively-rated smoking-related withdrawal symptoms and motivation to quit. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 33(3), 114–125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zvolensky, M. J., Garey, L., Allan, N. P., Farris, S. G., Raines, A. M., Smits, J. A. J., Kauffman, B. Y., Manning, K., & Schmidt, N. B. (2018). Effects of anxiety sensitivity reduction on smoking abstinence: An analysis from a panic prevention program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86, 474–485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zvolensky, M. J., & Smits, J. A. (2007). Anxiety in health behaviors and physical illness. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
- Zvolensky, M. J., Vujanovic, A. A., Miller, M. O. B., Bernstein, A., Yartz, A. R., Gregor, K. L., … Gibson, L. E. (2007). Incremental validity of anxiety sensitivity in terms of motivation to quit, reasons for quitting, and barriers to quitting among community-recruited daily smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 9(9), 965–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar