Moderators of Symptomatic Outcome in Metacognitive Training for Psychosis (MCT). Who Benefits and Who Does Not?
Metacognitive training (MCT) for psychosis is a group intervention targeted at reducing positive symptoms in schizophrenia through an improvement of cognitive biases in these patients. Despite evidence for its feasibility and efficacy, the recommendations for including or excluding patients from MCT have so far been largely based on anecdotal clinical wisdom rather than empirical evidence. Predictors and moderators of outcome are presently unknown. We reanalyzed data from a large randomized controlled trial, for which 150 patients were randomly assigned to either MCT or CogPack® (neurocognitive training) and followed up for up to 3 years. We explored which demographic variables, baseline symptoms, and cognitive biases would predict overall outcome and specific treatment benefits in MCT. Low self-esteem and social anxiety at baseline as well as positive appraisal of the intervention were consistently associated with improved outcome in MCT relative to CogPack®. Among other variables, improvement of cognitive biases and selective attention during the intervention period as well as number of sessions attended were general predictors of positive outcome, irrespective of the type of intervention. Patients with cognitive biases and psychological strain (e.g., low self-esteem and quality of life) paired with social problems may represent an ideal target group for MCT. The present findings await replication in independent samples and may not generalise to other forms of metacognitive training (e.g., MCT for depression) or individualized metacognitive intervention for psychosis (MCT+).
KeywordsMetacognitive training Cognitive biases Randomized controlled trial Moderation Outcome
The study was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG; Mo 969/6-1 and 6-2).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The study was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG), awarded to SM (DFG Mo 969/6-1 and 6-2). SM and TSW are developers of metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT). SM has received a honorarium from Janssen and Lilly for speaking about MCT. Steffen Moritz, Mahesh Menon, Devon Andersen, Todd S. Woodward and Jürgen Gallinat declares that they no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional as well as national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. We received ethical approval by the Medical Board Hamburg.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- Brickenkamp, R. (1978). Test d2. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Eichner, C., & Berna, F. (2016). Acceptance and efficacy of metacognitive training (MCT) on positive symptoms and delusions in patients with schizophrenia: A meta-analysis taking into account important moderators. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 42(4), 952–962. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv225.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Greenstein, D. K., Franklin, M. E., & McGuffin, P. (1999). Measuring motivation to change: An examination of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Questionnaire (URICA) in an adolescent sample. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 36(1), 47–55. doi: 10.1037/h0087813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hauschildt, M., & Moritz, S. (2015). Randomized-controlled trial of a newly-ceveloped self-help approach “myMCT” for obsessive compulsive disorder. In Annual Conference of the European Association for Behavioural Cognitive Therapies (EACBT). Israel: Jerusalem.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
- Kuhnigk, O., Slawik, L., Meyer, J., Naber, D., & Reimer, J. (2012). Valuation and attainment of treatment goals in schizophrenia: Perspectives of patients, relatives, physicians, and payers. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 18(5), 321–328. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000419816.75752.65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marker, K. (2003). COGPACK manual. Ladenburg: Marker Software.Google Scholar
- Mehl, S., Landsberg, M. W., Schmidt, A.-C., Cabanis, M., Bechdolf, A., Herrlich, J., … Wagner, M. (2014). Why do bad things happen to me? Attributional style, depressed mood, and persecutory delusions in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40, 1338–1346. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu040.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Menon, M., Pomarol-Clotet, E., McKenna, P. J., & McCarthy, R. A. (2006). Probabilistic reasoning in schizophrenia: A comparison of the performance of deluded and nondeluded schizophrenic patients and exploration of possible cognitive underpinnings. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 11(6), 521–536. doi: 10.1080/13546800544000046.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moritz, S., & Woodward, T. S. (2007). Metacognitive training for schizophrenia patients (MTC): A pilot study on feasibility, treatment adherence, and subjective efficacy. German Journal of Psychiatry, 10, 69–78.Google Scholar
- Moritz, S., Andreou, C., Schneider, B. C., Wittekind, C. E., Menon, M., Balzan, R. P., & Woodward, T. S. (2014a). Sowing the seeds of doubt: A narrative review on metacognitive training in schizophrenia. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(4), 358–366. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.04.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moritz, S., Woodward, T. S., Hauschildt, M., & Group, M. S. (2015b). Metacognitive Training for Psychosis (MCT). Sixth volume, version 6.2. Hamburg: VanHam Campus Press.Google Scholar
- Moritz, S., Schilling, L., Wingenfeld, K., Köther, U., Wittekind, C., Terfehr, K., & Spitzer, C. (2011). Psychotic-like cognitive biases in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42(3), 349–354. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.02.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moritz, S., Stepulovs, O., Schröder, J., Hottenrott, B., Meyer, B., & Hauschildt, M. (2016a). Is the whole less than the sum of its parts? Full versus individually adapted metacognitive self-help for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 9, 107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2016.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moritz, S., Van Quaquebeke, N., & Lincoln, T. M. (2012). Jumping to conclusions is associated with paranoia but not general suspiciousness: A comparison of two versions of the probabilistic reasoning paradigm. Schizophrenia Research and Treatment. doi: 10.1155/2012/384039.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Moritz, S., Veckenstedt, R., Bohn, F., Hottenrott, B., Scheu, F., Randjbar, S., … Roesch-Ely, D. (2013). Complementary group Metacognitive Training (MCT) reduces delusional ideation in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 151(1–3), 61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.10.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reitan, R. M. (1992). Trail Making Test. Manual of administration and scoring. Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory.Google Scholar
- Roth, A., & Fonagy, P. (2005). What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Schilling, L., Moritz, S., Köther, U., & Nagel, M. (2015). Preliminary results on acceptance, feasibility, and subjective efficacy of the add-on group intervention metacognitive training for borderline patients. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29(2), 153–164. doi: 10.1891/0889-83188.8.131.52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., … Dunbar, G. C. (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59(Suppl. 20), 22–33. doi: 10.1016/S0924-9338(99)80239-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- van der Gaag, M., Cuijpers, A., Hoffman, T., Remijsen, M., Hijman, R., de Haan, L., … Wiersma, D. (2006). The five-factor model of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale I: Confirmatory factor analysis fails to confirm 25 published five-factor solutions. Schizophrenia Research, 85(1–3), 273–279. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.04.001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Oosterhout, B., Krabbendam, L., de Boer, K., Ferwerda, J., van der Helm, M., Stant, A. D., & van der Gaag, M. (2014). Metacognitive group training for schizophrenia spectrum patients with delusions: A randomized controlled trial. Psychological Medicine, 44(14), 3025–3035. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714000555.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waller, H., Emsley, R., Freeman, D., Bebbington, P., Dunn, G., Fowler, D., … Garety, P. (2015). Thinking Well: A randomised controlled feasibility study of a new CBT therapy targeting reasoning biases in people with distressing persecutory delusional beliefs. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 48, 82–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.02.007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Wilson, B., Cockburn, J., & Baddeley, A. (1985). The Rivermead behavioural memory test. Reading: Thames Valley Test.Google Scholar
- Wilson, B., Cockburn, J., & Baddeley, A. (1992). Rivermead behavioural memory test. German translation. Bury St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. (2004). The World Health Organization quality of life (WHOQOL)-BREF. World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar