Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 745–756 | Cite as

Attitudes Towards Internet Interventions Among Psychotherapists and Individuals with Mild to Moderate Depression Symptoms

  • Johanna Schröder
  • Thomas Berger
  • Björn Meyer
  • Wolfgang Lutz
  • Martin Hautzinger
  • Christina Späth
  • Christiane Eichenberg
  • Jan Philipp Klein
  • Steffen Moritz
Original Article

Abstract

Internet interventions may help bridging gaps in the treatment of depression but dissemination is slow in most countries. Attitudes towards these novel treatments options among health care professionals and potential users may be crucial for a successful implementation. We recruited 1004 adults with mild to moderate depression symptoms within a randomized-controlled trial (RCT) on the efficacy of an Internet intervention (EVIDENT trial), and 428 licensed psychotherapists. We used the Attitudes towards Psychological Online Interventions Questionnaire (APOI) and confirmed psychometric validity of an adapted version for health care professionals, in order to test if psychotherapists hold more negative attitudes towards such interventions compared to individuals with depression symptoms, and to explore variables that predict these attitudes. Individuals with depression symptoms reported more positive attitudes towards Internet interventions than psychotherapists (large group difference; η p 2  = 0.384). Recruitment in clinical settings was associated with more negative attitudes compared to recruitment via the media. Among therapists, endorsing a psychodynamic rather than another theoretical orientation was associated with more pronounced negative attitudes. Results elucidate possible reasons for the slow dissemination of Internet interventions and suggest pathways for appropriate implementation into healthcare services.

Keywords

Internet interventions iCBT Depression Attitudes Psychotherapists 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank GAIA AG (Hamburg, Germany), which gave technical support and made the Internet intervention (deprexis) available at no cost to the participants in the trial. The full EVIDENT trial team consists of the following: Sandra Nolte, Matthias Rose (local principal investigator), Anna Paulitschek, Leonie Gmöhling, and Leonie Schickedanz (Berlin); Thomas Berger (Bern); Viola Gräfe and Wolfgang Greiner (local principal investigator; Bielefeld); Mirja Behrens, Cecile Hörmann, Anna Katharina Jahns, Thies Lüdtke, Björn Meyer, Steffen Moritz (local principal investigator), Johanna Schröder, Amit Gulati, and Eik Vettorazzi (Hamburg); Carla Gamon, Fritz Hohagen (principal investigator), Philipp Klein (local principal investigator), Antje Roniger, and Christina Späth (Lübeck); Alice Arndt, Liv Glindemann, Wolfgang Lutz (local principal investigator), David Rosenbaum, and Kathinka Wolter (Trier), and Flora Bach, Elisabeth Beck, Kristina Fuhr, Martin Hautzinger (local principal investigator), Katharina Krisch, and Melanie Wahl (Tübingen).

Funding

The EVIDENT trial, which underlay this study, was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health (II A 5-2512 FSB 052).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Björn Meyer reports that he is employed at Gaia AG, the developer and owner of an Internet intervention (deprexis). Johanna Schröder, Thomas Berger, Wolfgang Lutz, Martin Hautzinger, Christina Späth, Christiane Eichenberg, Jan Philipp Klein, and Steffen Moritz declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this work.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The trial was approved by the ethics committee of the German Psychological Association (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie; DGPs) and registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01636752).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Andersson, G., & Cuijpers, P. (2009). Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: A meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(4), 196–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson, G., & Titov, N. (2014). Advantages and limitations of internet-based interventions for common mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 13(1), 4–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, G., & Williams, A. D. (2014). Up-scaling clinician assisted internet cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) for depression: A model for dissemination into primary care. Clinical Psychology Review, 41, 40–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnberg, F. K., Linton, S. J., Hultcrantz, M., Heintz, E., & Jonsson, U. (2014). Internet-delivered psychological treatments for mood and anxiety disorders: A systematic review of their efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. PloS ONE, 9(5), e98118.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Barth, J., Munder, T., Gerger, H., Nüesch, E., Trelle, S., Znoj, H., & Cuijpers, P. (2013). Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression: A network meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine, 10(5), e1001454.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchanan, T. (2003). Internet-based questionnaire assessment: appropriate use in clinical contexts. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 32(3), 100–109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Caspar, F. (2004). Technological developments and applications in clinical psychology and psychotherapy: Introduction. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(3), 221–238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Caspar, F., Berger, T., Lotz-Rambaldi, W., & Hohagen, F. (2013). Internetbasierte Psychotherapie und E-Mental-Health. Verhaltenstherapie, 23(3), 137–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chisholm, D., Sweeny, K., Sheehan, P., Rasmussen, B., Smit, F., Cuijpers, P., & Saxena, S. (2016). Scaling-up treatment of depression and anxiety: A global return on investment analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(5), 415–424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, D. M. (2011). Implementing NICE guidelines for the psychological treatment of depression and anxiety disorders: The IAPT experience. International Review of Psychiatry, 23(4), 318–327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Cuijpers, P. (2011). The patient perspective in research on major depression. BMC Psychiatry, 11(89), 1–2.Google Scholar
  12. Drozd, F., Vaskinn, L., Bergsund, H. B., Haga, S. M., Slinning, K., & Bjørkli, C. A. (2016). The implementation of Internet interventions for depression: A scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ebert, D. D., Berking, M., Cuijpers, P., Lehr, D., Pörtner, M., & Baumeister, H. (2015). Increasing the acceptance of internet-based mental health interventions in primary care patients with depressive symptoms. A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Affective Disorders, 176, 9–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Eichenberg, C., & Kienzle, K. (2011). Psychotherapeuten und Internet. Psychotherapeut, 58(5), 485–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eichenberg, C., Grabmayer, G., & Green, N. (2016). Acceptance of serious games in psychotherapy: An inquiry into the stance of therapists and patients. Telemedicine & E-Health, 22(11), 945–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Emmelkamp, P. M. G., David, D., Beckers, T. O. M., Muris, P., Cuijpers, P. I. M., Lutz, W., & Botella, C. (2014). Advancing psychotherapy and evidence-based psychological interventions. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 23(1), 58–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fournier, J. C., Derubeis, R. J., Hollon, S. D., Shelton, R. C., & Fawcett, J. (2010). Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity. Journal of the American Medical Association, 303(1), 47–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Gun, S. Y., Titov, N., & Andrews, G. (2011). Acceptability of Internet treatment of anxiety and depression. Australasian Psychiatry, 19(3), 259–264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hakstian, A. R., Roed, J. C., & Lind, J. C. (1979). Two-sample T2 procedure and the assumption of homogeneous covariance matrices. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 1255–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hedman, E., Ljótsson, B., Kaldo, V., Hesser, H., El Alaoui, S., Kraepelien, M., & Lindefors, N. (2014). Effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for depression in routine psychiatric care. Journal of Affective Disorders, 155, 49–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Holzinger, A., Matschinger, H., & Angermeyer, M. C. (2011). What to do about depression? Help-seeking and treatment recommendations of the public. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 20(2), 163–169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Houle, J., Villaggi, B., Beaulieu, M. -D., Lespérance, F., Rondeau, G., & Lambert, J. (2013). Treatment preferences in patients with first episode depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 147, 94–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. IBM®. (2012a). IBM ® SPSS ® Statistics (Version 21.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.Google Scholar
  25. IBM®. (2012b). IBM ® SPSS ® Amos (Version 21.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.Google Scholar
  26. Johansson, R., & Andersson, G. (2012). Internet-based psychological treatments for depression. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 12(7), 861–870.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Johansson, R., Ekbladh, S., Hebert, A., Lindström, M., Möller, S., Petitt, E., & Andersson, G. (2012). Psychodynamic guided self-help for adult depression through the internet: a randomised controlled trial. PloS One, 7(5), e38021.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaltenthaler, E., Sutcliffe, P., Parry, G., Beverley, C., Rees, A., & Ferriter, M. (2008). The acceptability to patients of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: A systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 38(11), 1521–1530.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Klein, J. P., & Berger, T. (2013). Internetbasierte psychologische Behandlung bei Depressionen. Verhaltenstherapie, 23(3), 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klein, J. P., Berger, T., Schröder, J., Späth, C., Meyer, B., Caspar, F., & Moritz, S. (2013). The EVIDENT-trial: Protocol and rationale of a multicenter randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of an online-based psychological intervention. BMC Psychiatry, 13(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klein, J. P., Berger, T., Schröder, J., Späth, C., Meyer, B., Caspar, F., & Hohagen, F. (2016). Effects of a psychological Internet intervention in the treatment of mild to moderate depressive symptoms: Results of the EVIDENT study, a randomized controlled trial. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 85(4), 218–228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kohn, R., Saxena, S., Levav, I., & Saraceno, B. (2004). The treatment gap in mental health care. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(11), 858–866.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9. Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, D., Weiller, E., Amorim, P., Bonora, I., Harnett Sheehan, K., & Dunbar, G. (1997). The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: Reliability and validity according to the CIDI. European Psychiatry, 12(5), 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lutz, W., Rubel, J., Schiefele, A. -K., Zimmermann, D., Böhnke, J. R., & Wittmann, W. W. (2015). Feedback and therapist effects in the context of treatment outcome and treatment length. Psychotherapy Research, 25(6), 647–660.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Marks, I., & Cavanagh, K. (2009). Computer-aided psychological treatments: Evolving issues. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 121–141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Meyer, B., Berger, T., Caspar, F., Beevers, C. G., Andersson, G., & Weiss, M. (2009). Effectiveness of a novel integrative online treatment for depression (Deprexis): Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(2), e15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Meyer, B., Bierbrodt, J., Schröder, J., Berger, T., Beevers, C. G., Weiss, M., & Klein, J. P. (2015). Effects of an Internet intervention (Deprexis) on severe depression symptoms: Randomized controlled trial. Internet Interventions, 2(1), 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mohr, D. C., Ho, J., Duffecy, J., Baron, K. G., Lehman, K. A., Jin, L., & Reifler, D. (2010). Perceived barriers to psychological treatments and their relationship to depression. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(4), 394–409.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Mora, I., Nevid, J., & Chaplin, W. (2008). Psychologist treatment recommendations for Internet-based therapeutic interventions. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 3052–3062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moritz, S., Schröder, J., Meyer, B., & Hauschildt, M. (2012). The more it is needed, the less it is wanted: Attitudes toward face-to-face intervention among depressed patients undergoing online treatment. Depression and Anxiety, 30(2), 157–167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Morris, J., Lora, A., McBain, R., & Saxena, S. (2012). Global mental health resources and services: A WHO survey of 184 countries. Public Health Reviews, 34(2), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Murray, C. J., & Lopez, A. D. (1997). Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global burden of disease study. Lancet, 349(9063), 1436–1442.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Musiat, P., Goldstone, P., & Tarrier, N. (2014). Understanding the acceptability of e-mental health - attitudes and expectations towards computerised self-help treatments for mental health problems. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Richards, D., & Richardson, T. (2012). Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(4), 329–342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Schröder, J., Berger, T., Westermann, S., Klein, J. P., & Moritz, S. (2016). Internet interventions for depression: New developments. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 18, 203–212.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Schröder, J., Sautier, L., Kriston, L., Berger, T., Meyer, B., Späth, C., & Moritz, S. (2015). Development of a questionnaire measuring attitudes towards psychological online interventions—the APOI. Journal of Affective Disorders, 187, 136–141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sielk, M., Altiner, A., Janssen, B., Becker, N., & Pilars de Pilar, M. (2009). Prävalenz und Diagnostik depressiver Störungen in der Allgemeinarztpraxis. Ein kritischer Vergleich zwischen PHQ-D und hausärztlicher Einschätzung. Psychiatrische Praxis, 36, 169–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Siponen, U., & Välimäki, M. (2003). Patients’ satisfaction with outpatient psychiatric care. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 10, 129–135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Titov, N., Dear, B. F., Staples, L. G., Bennett-Levy, J., Klein, B., Rapee, R. M., & Nielssen, O. B. (2015). MindSpot clinic: An accessible, efficient, and effective online treatment service for anxiety and depression. Psychiatric Services, 66(10), 1043–1050.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Vis, C., Kleiboer, A., Prior, R., Bønes, E., Cavallo, M., Clark, S. A., & Riper, H. (2015). Implementing and up-scaling evidence-based eMental health in Europe: The study protocol for the MasterMind project. Internet Interventions, 2(4), 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Waller, R., & Gilbody, S. (2009). Barriers to the uptake of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy: A systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. Psychological Medicine, 39(5), 705–712.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wangberg, S. C., Gammon, D., & Spitznogle, K. (2007). In the eyes of the beholder: Exploring psychologists’ attitudes towards and use of e-therapy in Norway. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10(3), 418–423.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Warmerdam, L., Smit, F., van Straten, A., Riper, H., & Cuijpers, P. (2010). Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of internet-based treatment for adults with depressive symptoms: Randomized trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(5), e53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Watts, S. E., & Andrews, G. (2014). Internet access is NOT restricted globally to high income countries: So why are evidenced based prevention and treatment programs for mental disorders so rare? Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 10, 71–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Whitfield, G., & Williams, C. (2004). If the evidence is so good–why doesn’t anyone use them? A national survey of the use of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 32(1), 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wittchen, H. U., Jacobi, F., Rehm, J., Gustavsson, A., Svensson, M., Jönsson, B., & Steinhausen, H. -C. (2011). The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 21(9), 655–679.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johanna Schröder
    • 1
  • Thomas Berger
    • 2
  • Björn Meyer
    • 3
  • Wolfgang Lutz
    • 4
  • Martin Hautzinger
    • 5
  • Christina Späth
    • 6
  • Christiane Eichenberg
    • 7
  • Jan Philipp Klein
    • 6
  • Steffen Moritz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Psychology and PsychotherapyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  3. 3.Research DepartmentHamburgGermany
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TrierTrierGermany
  5. 5.Department of Psychology Clinical Psychology and PsychotherapyEberhard Karls University TübingenTübingenGermany
  6. 6.Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyUniversity of LübeckLübeckGermany
  7. 7.Institute for PsychosomaticsSigmund Freud University ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations