Examining a Novel Gamified Approach to Attentional Retraining: Effects of Single and Multiple Session Training
- 468 Downloads
Negative attention biases (AB) may play a causal role in the development of emotional disorders. In order to examine this proposed causal role, researchers have developed Attention Bias Modification (ABM) paradigms to experimentally induce or reduce AB. To date, most ABM studies have been based on modified dot-probe tasks. However, this task is only moderately successful in changing patterns of AB. In two laboratory-based experiments, we explored the effects of a novel visual search ABM paradigm, called “Intrinsically-Motivating Playable Attentional Control Training”, on AB processes and mood in undergraduate participants. Motivation was fostered by active task involvement (i.e., searching for target faces while ignoring irrelevant faces) and gamification techniques. In both experiments, training performance significantly improved, but failed to transfer to attention and mood measures. Possible explanations for the failure to find transfer effects are discussed.
KeywordsAttention Attentional bias modification Training Anxiety Emotion Emotional facial expressions
This study was funded by a Special Research Funds of Ghent University (BOF10/GOA/014). The programming of the IMPACT task was supported by a grant from the Milton Fund of Harvard Medical School.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Elien K. Pieters, Rudi De Raedt, Philip M. Enock, Laura M. S. De Putter, Howard Braham, Richard J. McNally, Ernst H. W. Koster declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from each participant in the study.
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
- Amir, N., Beard, C., Taylor, C. T., Klumpp, H., Elias, J., Burns, M., et al. (2009). Attention training in individuals with generalized social phobia: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(5), 961–973. doi: 10.1037/a0016685.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Clarke, P. J. F., Browning, M., Hammond, G., Notebaert, L., & MacLeod, C. (2014a). The causal role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the modification of attentional bias: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation. Biological Psychiatry, 76(12), 946–952. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.03.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Beurs, E., den Hollander-Gijsman, M. E., Helmich, S., & Zitman, F. G. (2007). The tripartite model for assessing symptoms of anxiety and depression: Psychometrics of the Dutch version of the mood and anxiety symptoms questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(7), 1609–1617. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.07.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Raedt, R., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Understanding vulnerability for depression from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: A reappraisal of attentional factors and a new conceptual framework. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 32(1), 50–70. doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.1.50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dennis-Tiwary, T., Egan, L. J., Babkirk, S., & Denefrio, S. (2015). For whom the bell tolls: Neurocognitive individual differences in the acute stress-reduction effects of an attention bias modification game for anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy,. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.008.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Eldar, S., Apter, A., Lotan, D., Edgar, K. P., Naim, R., Fox, N. A., et al. (2012). Attention bias modification treatment for pediatric anxiety disorders: A randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 169(2), 213–220. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11060886.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Enock, P. M. (2015). Making an IMPACT: Designing and testing a novel attentional training game to reduce social anxiety. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences.Google Scholar
- Enock, P. M., & McNally, R. J. (2013). How mobile apps and other web-based interventions can transform psychological treatment and the treatment development cycle. The Behavior Therapist, 36(3), 56–66.Google Scholar
- Grafton, B., Notebaert, L., & MacLeod, C. (2013). Emotion in motion: A novel approach to the assessment and modification of attentional bias. Paper presented at the 7th World Congress of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, Lima, Peru.Google Scholar
- Hakamata, Y., Lissek, S., Bar-Haim, Y., Britton, J. C., Fox, N. A., Leibenluft, E., et al. (2010). Attention bias modification treatment: A meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 68(11), 982–990. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.021.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Heeren, A., De Raedt, R., Koster, E. H. W., & Philippot, P. (2013). The (neuro)cognitive mechanisms behind attention bias modification in anxiety: Proposals based on theoretical accounts of attentional bias. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 119. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Heeren, A., Mogoaşe, C., McNally, R. J., Schmitz, A., & Philippot, P. (2015a). Does attention bias modification improve attentional control? A double-blind randomized experiment with individuals with social anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 29, 35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.10.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirsch, C. R., MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., Sandher, O., Siyani, A., & Hayes, S. (2011). The contribution of attentional bias to worry: Distinguishing the roles of selective engagement and disengagement. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(2), 272–277. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.09.013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., Marshuetz, C., Koeppe, R. A., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (1998). Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(14), 8410–8413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8410.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kessler, R., Heeringa, S., Lakoma, M., Petukhova, M., Rupp, A., Schoenbaum, M., et al. (2008). Individual and societal effects of mental disorders on earnings in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(6), 703–711. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08010126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kessler, R. C., Petukhova, M., Sampson, N. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Wittchen, H.-U. (2012). Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 21(3), 169–184. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1359.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces—KDEF [CD-ROM]. Stockholm: Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet.Google Scholar
- MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L., Ebsworthy, G., & Holker, L. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(1), 107–123. doi: 10.1037//0021-843X.111.1.107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McNally, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (2016). The affordable access gap: CBT’s hidden dissemination problem. The Behavior Therapist, 39, 21–22.Google Scholar
- Psychology Software Tools, Inc. (2002). E-Prime (Version 20). Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
- Raes, F., Schoofs, H., Hoes, D., Hermans, D., Van Den Eede, F., & Franck, E. (2009). ‘Reflection’ en ‘brooding’ als subtypes van rumineren: een herziening van de Ruminative Response Scale. [‘Reflection’ and ‘brooding’ as subtypes of rumination: A revision of the Ruminative Response Scale]. Gedragstherapie, 42(3/4), 205–214.Google Scholar
- Schulte-van Maaren, Y. W. M., Carlier, I. V. E., Zitman, F. G., van Hemert, A. M., de Waal, M. W. M., van Noorden, M. S., et al. (2012). Reference values for generic instruments used in routine outcome monitoring: The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study. BMC Psychiatry, 12(1), 203. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Taylor, C. T., Cross, K., & Amir, N. (2016). Attentional control moderates the relationship between social anxiety symptoms and attentional disengagement from threatening information. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 50, 68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.05.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wardenaar, K. J., van Veen, T., Giltay, E. J., de Beurs, E., Penninx, B. W. J. H., & Zitman, F. G. (2010). Development and validation of a 30-item short adaptation of the Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire (MASQ). Psychiatry Research, 179(1), 101–106. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.03.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watson, D., Weber, K., Assenheimer, J. S., Clark, L. A., Strauss, M. E., & McCormick, R. A. (1995). Testing a tripartite model: I. Evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of anxiety and depression symptom scales. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104(1), 3–14. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.104.1.3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar