Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 863–879 | Cite as

The Socratic Method in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: A Narrative Review

  • Gavin I. Clark
  • Sarah J. Egan
Original Article

Abstract

The Socratic Method has been described as an important component of CBT interventions yet an empirical case for its use has not been made. The objective of this paper is to review the role of the Socratic Method in CBT in four stages. First, a review of the literature describes how the Socratic Method is applied and defined within CBT, with assumptions regarding its proposed benefits identified. Second, a review of empirical literature demonstrates that multiple challenges to the evaluation of the Socratic Method exist and that no direct evidence supports the premise that it is beneficial in CBT. Evidence is examined which may suggest why the Socratic Method could be beneficial in therapy. Finally, the hypothesised function of the Socratic Method within therapy is discussed in reference to the Interacting Cognitive Subsystems framework. A number of avenues for future research are proposed in order to determine whether this potentially valuable therapeutic component contributes to the efficacy of CBT.

Keywords

Cognitive therapy/CBT Socratic dialogue Socratic Method Socratic questioning Guided discovery 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Gavin I. Clark and Sarah J. Egan declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (national and institutional).

Animal Rights

No animals were used in the present study.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2009). Treatment of patients with panic disorder (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: APA Practice Guidelines.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, G., Cuijpers, P., Craske, M. G., McEvoy, P., & Titov, N. (2010). Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: A meta-analysis. PLoS One, 5(10), e13196.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnkoff, D. B. (1986). A comparison of the coping and restructuring components of cognitive restructuring. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10(2), 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnard, P. J. (2009). Depression and attention to two kinds of meaning: A cognitive perspective. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 23(3), 248–262.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnard, P. J., & Teasdale, J. D. (1991). Interacting cognitive subsystems: A systemic approach to cognitive-affective interaction and change. Cognition and Emotion, 5(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, A. T., & Dozois, D. J. (2011). Cognitive therapy: Current status and future directions. Annual Review of Medicine, 62, 397–409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  10. Beck, A. T., Wright, F. D., Newman, C. F., & Liese, B. S. (1993). Cognitive therapy of substance abuse. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bennett-Levy, J. (2003). Mechanisms of change in cognitive therapy: The case of automatic thought records and behavioural experiments. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 31(03), 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bennett-Levy, J., & Padesky, C. A. (2014). Use it or lose it: Post-workshop reflection enhances learning and utilization of CBT skills. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 21(1), 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bishop, W., & Fish, J. M. (1999). Questions as interventions: Perceptions of Socratic, solution focused, and diagnostic questioning styles. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive–Behavior Therapy, 17(2), 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blackburn, I. M., James, I. A., Milne, D. L., Baker, C., Standart, S., Garland, A., & Reichelt, F. K. (2001). The revised cognitive therapy scale (CTS-R): psychometric properties. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29(04), 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blackburn, I. M., James, I. A., Milne, D. L., Reichelt, F. K., Garland, A., Baker, C., & Claydon, A. (2000). Cognitive Therapy Scale-revised (CTS-R). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Newcastle Cognitive and Behavioural Therapies Centre.Google Scholar
  16. Calero-Elvira, A., Froján-Parga, M. X., Ruiz-Sancho, E. M., & Alpañés-Freitag, M. (2013). Descriptive study of the Socratic method: Evidence for verbal shaping. Behavior Therapy, 44(4), 625–638.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Calvert, P., & Palmer, C. (2003). Application of the cognitive therapy model to initial crisis assessment. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 12, 30–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Carey, T. A., & Mullan, R. J. (2004). What is Socratic questioning? Psychotherapy: Theory Research, Practice, Training, 41(3), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cavanagh, K., & Millings, A. (2013). (Inter) personal computing: The role of the therapeutic relationship in e-mental health. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 43(4), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chi, M. T., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477.Google Scholar
  21. Clark, D. M. (2004). Developing new treatments: On the interplay between theories, experimental science and clinical innovation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(9), 1089–1104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Clark, D. M., Ehlers, A., McManus, F., Hackmann, A., Fennell, M., Campbell, H., & Louis, B. (2003). Cognitive therapy versus fluoxetine in generalized social phobia: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(6), 1058–1067.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Clark, D. M., Salkovskis, P. M., Hackmann, A., Middleton, H., Anastasiades, P., & Gelder, M. (1994). A comparison of cognitive therapy, applied relaxation and imipramine in the treatment of panic disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 164(6), 759–769.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Clarke, H., Rees, A., & Hardy, G. E. (2004). The big idea: Clients’ perspectives of change processes in cognitive therapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 77(1), 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Craik, F. I. M. (1983). On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 302, 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DeRubeis, R. J., Webb, C. A., Tang, T. Z., & Beck, A. T. (2009). Cognitive therapy. In K. S. Dobson (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive–behavioral therapies (3rd ed., pp. 277–316). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  27. Ehlers, A., Clark, D. M., Hackmann, A., McManus, F., & Fennell, M. (2005). Cognitive therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: Development and evaluation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(4), 413–431.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fairburn, C. G. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Froján-Parga, M. X., Calero-Elvira, A., & Montaño-Fidalgo, M. (2009). Analysis of the therapist’s verbal behavior during cognitive restructuring debates: A case study. Psychotherapy Research, 19(1), 30–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Froján-Parga, M. X., Calero-Elvira, A., & Montaño-Fidalgo, M. (2011). Study of the Socratic method during cognitive restructuring. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18(2), 110–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frusha, C. E. (2002). Rhetoric of change: A Socratic rhetorical inquiry into family therapy dialogue. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B—The Sciences & Engineering, 63(5-B), 2297.Google Scholar
  32. Goldin, P. R., Ziv, M., Jazaieri, H., Werner, K., Kraemer, H., Heimberg, R. G., & Gross, J. J. (2012). Cognitive reappraisal self-efficacy mediates the effects of individual cognitive–behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80(6), 1034–1040.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Greenberger, D., & Padesky, C. A. (1995). Mind over mood. New York: Guilford press.Google Scholar
  34. Gumley, A., White, C. A., & Power, K. (1999). An interacting cognitive subsystems model of relapse and the course of psychosis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 6(4), 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harvey, A., Watkins, E., Mansell, W., & Shafran, R. (2004). Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders: A transdiagnostic approach to research and treatment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haubert, L. C., & Dobson, K. S. (2007). Treatment of depression and mechanisms of change: Strengthening the links among theory, research, and practice. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 14(3), 247–251.Google Scholar
  37. Henninger, M., & Wyer, R. S. (1976). The recognition and elimination of inconsistencies among syllogistically related beliefs: Some new light on the Socratic effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 680–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hodgetts, A., & Wright, J. (2007). Researching clients’ experiences: A review of qualitative studies. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 14(3), 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoffart, A., Versland, S., & Sexton, H. (2002). Self-understanding, empathy, guided discovery, and schema belief in schema-focused cognitive therapy of personality problems: A process–outcome study. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(2), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hofmann, S. G., & Smits, J. A. (2008). Cognitive–behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69(4), 621–632.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (Eds.). (1994). The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (Vol. 173). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. James, I. A., Morse, R., & Howarth, A. (2010). The science and art of asking questions in cognitive therapy. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38(01), 83–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Jarrett, R. B., Vittengl, J. R., Doyle, K., & Clark, L. A. (2007). Changes in cognitive content during and following cognitive therapy for recurrent depression: Substantial and enduring, but not predictive of change in depressive symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(3), 432–446.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kardes, F. R., Cronley, M. L., Pontes, M. C., & Houghton, D. C. (2001). Down the garden path: The role of conditional inference processes in self-persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(3), 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kazantzis, N., Fairburn, C. G., Padesky, C. A., Reinecke, M., & Teesson, M. (2014). Unresolved issues regarding the research and practice of cognitive behavior therapy: The case of guided discovery using Socratic questioning. Behaviour Change, 31(01), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Keijsers, G. P. J., Schaap, C. P. D. R., & Hoogduin, C. A. L. (2000). The impact of interpersonal patient and therapist behavior on outcome in cognitive–behavior therapy a review of empirical studies. Behavior Modification, 24(2), 264–297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Keijsers, G. P., Schaap, C. P., Hoogduin, C. A., & Lammers, M. W. (1995). Patient-therapist interaction in the behavioral treatment of panic disorder with agoraphobia. Behavior Modification, 19(4), 491–517.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kennerley, H. (2007). Socratic method. Oxford, England: Oxford Cognitive Therapy Centre Essential Guides.Google Scholar
  49. Lambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice Training, 38(4), 357–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lengenfelder, J., Chiaravalloti, N. D., & DeLuca, J. (2007). The efficacy of the generation effect in improving new learning in persons with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 52(3), 290–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259–289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Liness, S., & Muston, J. (2011). National curriculum for high intensity cognitive behavioural therapy courses. Department of Health. Retrieved from http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/.
  53. Longmore, R. J., & Worrell, M. (2007). Do we need to challenge thoughts in cognitive behavioral therapy? Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 173–187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Longshore, D., Grills, C., & Annon, K. (1999). Effects of a culturally congruent intervention on cognitive factors related to drug-use recovery. Substance Use and Misuse, 34(9), 1223–1241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Mason, J. (2011). Cognitive engagement and questioning online. Education in a technological world: communicating current and emerging research and technological efforts. Formatex, Badajoz, Spain.Google Scholar
  56. McManus, F., Peerbhoy, D., Larkin, M., & Clark, D. M. (2010). Learning to change a way of being: An interpretative phenomenological perspective on cognitive therapy for social phobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24(6), 581–589.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. McManus, F., Van Doorn, K., & Yiend, J. (2012). Examining the effects of thought records and behavioral experiments in instigating belief change. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43(1), 540–547.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. McMillan, J. H. (1987). Enhancing college students’ critical thinking: A review of studies. Research in Higher Education, 26(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Miller, W. R., Benefield, R. G., & Tonigan, J. S. (1993). Enhancing motivation for change in problem drinking: A controlled comparison of two therapist styles. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(3), 455.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2009). Ten things that motivational interviewing is not. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37(02), 129–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Naeem, F., Phiri, P., Rathod, S., & Kingdon, D. (2010). Using CBT with diverse patients: Working with South Asian Muslims. In M. Mueller, H. Kennerley, F. McManus, & D. Westbrook (Eds.), Oxford guide to surviving as a CBT therapist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Neenan, M. (2009). Using Socratic questioning in coaching. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive–Behavior Therapy, 27(4), 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Neimeyer, R. A., Kazantzis, N., Kassler, D. M., Baker, K. D., & Fletcher, R. (2008). Group cognitive behavioural therapy for depression outcomes predicted by willingness to engage in homework, compliance with homework, and cognitive restructuring skill acquisition. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 37(4), 199–215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. NICE. (2013). Clinical Guideline 159: Social anxiety disorder: recognition, assessment and treatment. London: National Institute for clinical excellence. www.nice.org.uk.
  65. Overholser, J. C. (1987). Facilitating autonomy in passive-dependent persons: An integrative model. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 17(4), 250–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Overholser, J. C. (1993a). Elements of the Socratic method: I. Systematic questioning. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice Training, 30(1), 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Overholser, J. C. (1993b). Elements of the Socratic method: II. Inductive reasoning. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice Training, 30(1), 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Overholser, J. C. (1994). Elements of the Socratic method: III. Universal definitions. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice Training, 31(2), 286–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Overholser, J. C. (2011). Collaborative empiricism, guided discovery, and the Socratic method: Core processes for effective cognitive therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 18(1), 62–66.Google Scholar
  70. Padesky, C. A. (1993). Socratic questioning: Changing minds or guiding discovery. Paper presented at the A keynote address delivered at the European Congress of Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies, London.Google Scholar
  71. Padesky, C. A., & Beck, A. T. (2003). Science and philosophy: Comparison of cognitive therapy and rational emotive behavior therapy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 17(3), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rachman, S. (1997). The evolution of CBT. In D. M. Clark & C. Fairburn (Eds.), The science and practice of CBT (pp. 3–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Rakovshik, S. G., & McManus, F. (2010). Establishing evidence-based training in cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of current empirical findings and theoretical guidance. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(5), 496–516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Raue, P., Castonguay, L., & Goldfried, M. (1993). The working alliance: A comparison of two therapies. Psychotherapy Research, 3(3), 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Robichaud, M., & Dugas, M. J. (2006). A cognitive-behavioral treatment targeting intolerance of uncertainty. In Worry and its psychological disorders: Theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 289–304). Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rosé, C. P., Moore, J. D., VanLehn, K., & Allbritton, D. (2001). A comparative evaluation of socratic versus didactic tutoring. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Sciences Society, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK (pp. 869–874).Google Scholar
  77. Roth, A. D., & Pilling, S. (2007). The competences required to deliver effective cognitive and behavioural therapy for people with depression and with anxiety disorders. London: HMSO, Department of Health.Google Scholar
  78. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Schmidt, N. B., Woolaway-Bickel, K., Trakowski, J., Santiago, H., Storey, J., Koselka, M., & Cook, J. (2000). Dismantling cognitive–behavioral treatment for panic disorder: Questioning the utility of breathing retraining. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 417–424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Shaw, B. F., Elkin, I., Yamaguchi, J., Olmsted, M., Vallis, T. M., Dobson, K. S., & Imber, S. D. (1999). Therapist competence ratings in relation to clinical outcome in cognitive therapy of depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 837–846.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Siemonsma, P. C., Stuive, I., Roorda, L. D., Vollebregt, J. A., Walker, M. F., Lankhorst, G. J., & Lettinga, A. T. (2013). Cognitive treatment of illness perceptions in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Physical Therapy, 93(4), 435–448.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6), 592–604.Google Scholar
  83. Strunk, D. R., Brotman, M. A., DeRubeis, R. J., & Hollon, S. D. (2010). Therapist competence in cognitive therapy for depression: predicting subsequent symptom change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(3), 429–437.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Teasdale, J. D. (1993). Emotion and two kinds of meaning: Cognitive therapy and applied cognitive science. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31(4), 339–354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Teasdale, J. D. (1996). Clinically relevant theory: Integrating clinical insight with cognitive science. In P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (pp. 26–47). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  86. Teasdale, J. D., Taylor, M. J., Cooper, Z., Hayhurst, H., & Paykel, E. S. (1995). Depressive thinking: Shifts in construct accessibility or in schematic mental models? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104(3), 500–507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Trepka, C., Rees, A., Shapiro, D. A., Hardy, G. E., & Barkham, M. (2004). Therapist competence and outcome of cognitive therapy for depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28(2), 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Veale, D. (2008). Behavioural activation for depression. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 14(1), 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wells, A. (1997). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders: A practice manual and conceptual guide. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  90. Westbrook, D., Kennerley, H., & Kirk, J. (2011). An introduction to cognitive behaviour therapy: Skills & applications. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  91. Williams, K. E., & Chambless, D. L. (1990). The relationship between therapist characteristics and outcome of in vivo exposure treatment for agoraphobia. Behaviour Therapy, 21, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Yang, Y. T. C., Newby, T. J., & Bill, R. L. (2005). Using Socratic questioning to promote critical thinking skills through asynchronous discussion forums in distance learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Yengin, I., & Karahoca, A. (2012). What is Socratic method? The analysis of Socratic method through self determination theory and unified learning model. Global Journal on Technology, 2, 357–365.Google Scholar
  94. Young, J. (1990). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange.Google Scholar
  95. Young, J., & Beck, A. (1980). Cognitive therapy scale: rating manual. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Behavioural, Cognitive and Social SciencesUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.School of Psychology and Speech PathologyCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations