Specificity of CBT for Depression: A Contribution from Multiple Treatments Meta-analyses
- 2.6k Downloads
The “Dodo bird verdict,” which claims that all psychotherapies are equally effective, has been a source of bewilderment and intense controversy among psychiatrists and psychologists. To examine this issue, we focused on cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) and applied the newly developed review method known as multiple treatments meta-analysis (MTM). We identified randomized controlled trials comparing CBT against a psychological placebo (PP) and/or no treatment (NT) controls during the acute phase treatment of adults with depression. A random-effects MTM was conducted within a Bayesian framework. All the analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. The MTM of the evidence network from 18 studies (39 treatment arms, 1,153 participants) revealed that CBT was significantly more likely to yield a response than NT (OR 2.24, 1.32–3.88) and that CBT was nominally, but not significantly, superior to PP (OR 1.30, 0.53–2.94), which in turn was superior to NT (OR 1.73, 0.67–4.84). The intervention effects in MTM were associated with the number of sessions, and the specificity of CBT increased as the number of sessions increased. The specific component of CBT was estimated to constitute 50.4 % (19.7–85.0) when CBT was given for ten or more sessions. Despite the quantitatively and qualitatively limited body of randomized evidence examining this issue, the present study strongly suggested a non-null specific component of CBT when given for an adequate length.
KeywordsMultiple treatments meta-analysis Cognitive behavior therapy Dodo bird verdict Common factor Specific factor
This review was supported in part by the Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant (H22-Psychiatry-General-005, Principal investigator: Yutaka Ono, MD, PhD) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan to Furukawa. This is one publication of the High Impact Reviews of Effectiveness in Depression (HIRED) project in which a group of researchers within the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group conducted a systematic review of all available evidence for all psychotherapies for treating depression. Altogether they will contribute data to the network meta-analysis of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for treating depression. We thank Dr Kiyomi Shinohara and Dr Hissei Imai for help with data extraction. MH extracted the data and wrote the first draft of the protocol and the paper; HN analyzed the data; ST provided technical advice on analysis; PC, KI, MO extracted the data; RC is the principle investigator of HIRED project and contributed to the study selection and data collection process. VH contributed to study selection and data collection process. DC advised on the statistical analyses and contributed to data collection. TAF provided theoretical and clinical expertise for this paper. He was responsible for supervising the writing and preparing of this review. All the authors have seen, commented on, and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest
TAF has received honoraria for speaking at CME meetings sponsored by Asahi Kasei, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Mochida, MSD, Otsuka, Pfizer, Shionogi and Tanabe-Mitsubishi. He is 18 diplomate of the Academy of Cognitive Therapy. He has received royalties from Igaku-Shoin, Seiwa-Shoten and Nihon Bunka Kagaku-sha. He is on advisory board for Sekisui Chemicals and Takeda Science Foundation. All the other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. This study was supported in part by Grant-in-Aid by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare to TAF. The study has not been presented at any meeting.
- Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Besyner, K. J. (1979). The comparative efficacy of cognitive and behavioral treatments of depression: A multi-assessment approach. A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis in the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- da Costa, B. R., Rutjes, A. W., Johnston, B. C., Reichenbach, S., Nüesch, E., Tonia, T., et al. (2012). Methods to convert continuous outcomes into odds ratios of treatment response and numbers needed to treat: Meta-epidemiological study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 41(5), 1445–1459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dowrick, C., Dunn, G., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., Dalgard, O. S., Page, H., Lehtinen, V., et al. (2000). Problem solving treatment and group psychoeducation for depression: multicentre randomised controlled trial: Outcomes of Depression International Network (ODIN) Group. BMJ, 321(7274), 1450–1454.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ellis, A. (1979). Theoretical and empirical foundations of rational-emotive therapy. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
- Hegerl, U., Hautzinger, M., Mergl, R., Kohnen, R., Schutze, M., Scheunemann, W., et al. (2010). Effects of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in depressed primary-care patients: A randomized, controlled trial including a patients’ choice arm. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 13(1), 31–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hunot, V., Moore Theresa, H. M., Caldwell Deborah, M., Furukawa Toshi, A., Davies, P., Jones, H., et al. (2013). ‘Third wave’ cognitive and behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD008704.pub2/abstract. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008704.pub2.
- Kelly, M. L. (1982). Rational emotive therapy versus Lewinsohnian based approaches to the treatment of depression. Dissertation Abstracts International, 43(6-B). Google Scholar
- Lewinsohn, P. M., Antonuccio, D. O., Breckenridge, J. S., & Teri, L. (1984). The coping with depression course: A psychoeducational intervention for unipolar depression. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
- Serfaty, M. A., Haworth, D., Blanchard, M., Buszewicz, M., Murad, S., & King, M. (2009). Clinical effectiveness of individual cognitive behavioral therapy for depressed older people in primary care: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66(12), 1332–1340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shinohara, K., Honyashiki, M., Imai, H., Hunot, V., Caldwell Deborah, M., Davies, P., et al. (2013). Behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (10). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD008696.pub2/abstract. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008696.pub2.
- Siev, J., Huppert, J., & Chambless, D. (2010). Treatment specificity for panic disorder: A reply to Wampold, Imel, and Miller (2009). Behavior Therapist, 33, 12–14.Google Scholar
- Song, F., Eastwood, A. J., Gilbody, S., Duley, L., & Sutton, A. J. (2000). Publication and related biases. Health Technology Assessment, 4(10), 1–115.Google Scholar