Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 334–342 | Cite as

Coherence Between Attentional and Memory Biases in Sad and Formerly Depressed Individuals

  • Janna N. Vrijsen
  • Iris van Oostrom
  • Linda Isaac
  • Eni S. Becker
  • Anne Speckens
Original Article

Abstract

Cognitive theories assume a uniform processing bias across different samples, but the empirical support for this claim is rather weak and inconsistent. Therefore, coherence between biases across different cognitive domains in a sample of 133 non-depressed (Study 1) and a sample of 266 formerly depressed individuals (Study 2) was examined. In both studies, individuals were selected after a successful sad mood induction procedure. A Dot Probe task, an Emotional Stroop task and a self-referential Incidental Learning and Free Recall task were administered to all participants. Principle component analyses indicated coherence between attentional and memory bias in non-depressed, while in formerly depressed individuals distinct components for attentional biases and for memory bias were uncovered. The data suggest that in formerly depressed individuals, self-referent processing during encoding may be related to memory bias, whereas in non-depressed individuals memory bias may be related to both attentional bias and self-referent processing.

Keywords

Depression Attentional bias Memory bias Imagery Coherence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the participants for their time and effort and the Behavioural Science Institute for its support.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington. DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Beard, C., Sawyer, A. T., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Efficacy of attention bias modification using threat and appetitive stimuli: A meta-analytic review. Behavior Therapy, 43, 724–740.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, A. T. (1983). Cognitive therapy of depression: New perspectives. In P. J. Clayton & J. E. Barrett (Eds.), Treatment of depression: Old controversies and new approaches (pp. 315–350). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T. (2008). The evolution of the cognitive model of depression and its neurobiological correlates. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 969–977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory manual (2nd ed.). Sabn Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  7. Beevers, C. G., & Carver, C. S. (2003). Attentional bias and mood persistence as prospective predictors of dysphoria. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 619–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  10. Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., & Lee, S. C. (1997). Attentional biases for negative information in induced and naturally occurring dysphoria. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 911–927.Google Scholar
  11. Eide, P., Kemp, A., Silberstein, R. B., & Nathan, P. J. (2002). Test–retest reliability of the emotional Stroop task: Examining the paradox of measurement change. The Journal of Psychology, 136, 514–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis, A. J., Beevers, C. G., & Wells, T. T. (2011). Attention allocation and incidental recognition of emotional information in dysphoria. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 35, 425–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Everaert, J., Koster, E. H. W., & Derakshan, N. (2012). The combined cognitive bias hypothesis in depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 413–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1995). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorderspatient version 2.0 (SCID-1/P). New York: Biometrics Research Dept, New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Fitzgerald, D. A., Arnold, J. F., Becker, E. S., Speckens, A. E., Rinck, M., Rijpkema, M., et al. (2011). How mood challenges emotional memory formation: An fMRI investigation. Neuroimage, 56, 1783–1790.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gotlib, I. H., & Joormann, J. (2010). Cognition and depression: Current status and fututre directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 285–312.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gotlib, I. H., Kasch, K. L., Traill, S., Joormann, J., Arnow, B. A., & Johnson, S. L. (2004). Coherence and specificity of information-processing biases in depression and social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 386–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hallion, L. S., & Ruscio, A. M. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 940–958.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hertel, P. T., & Mathews, A. (2011). Cognitive bias modification: Past perspectives, current findings, and future applications. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirsch, C. R., Clark, D. M., & Mathews, A. (2006). Imagery and interpretations in social phobia: Support for the combined cognitive biases hypothesis. Behavior Therapy, 37, 223–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joormann, J., Dkane, M., & Gotlib, I. H. (2006). Adaptive and maladaptive domponents of rumination? Diagnostic specificity and relation to depressive biases. Behavior Therapy, 37, 269–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joormann, J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2007). Selective attention to emotional faces following recovery from depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 80–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koster, E. H. W., De Raedt, R., Leyman, L., & De Lissnyder, E. (2010). Mood-congruent attention and memory bias in dysphoria: Exploring the coherence among information-processing biases. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 219–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces. Stockholm: Karolinska Institute, Psychology section, Department of Clinical Neuroscience.Google Scholar
  26. Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1994). Cognitive approached to emotiona and emotional disorders. Annual Review Psychology, 45, 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2002). Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annual Review Clinical Psychology, 1, 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matt, G. E., Vazquez, C., & Campbell, W. K. (1992). Mood-congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCabe, S. B., Gotlib, A. H., & Martin, R. A. (2000). Cognitive vulnerability for depression: Deployment of attention as a function of history of depression and current mood state. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parrott, W., & Sabini, J. (1990). Mood and memory under natural conditions: Evidence for mood-incongruent recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peckham, A. D., McHugh, R. K., & Otto, M. W. (2010). A meta-analyses of the magnitude of biased attentional in depression. Depression and Anxiety, 27, 1135–1142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Phaf, R. H., van der Leij, A. R., Stienen, B. M. C., & Bierman, D. (2006). Positieve, neutrale en negatieve woorden bij minimale aanbieding: Een ordening door perceptuele clarificatie [Positive, neutral and negative words at minimal presentation levels: Ordering by perceptual clarification]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Technical Report, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  34. Raes, F., Williams, J. M. G., & Hermans, D. (2009). Reducing cognitive vulnerability to depression: A preliminary investigation of MEmory Specificity Training (MEST) in inpatients with depressive symptomatology. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40, 24–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raven, J. C. (1958). Standard progressive matrices. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
  36. Ridout, N., Noreen, A., & Johal, J. (2009). Memory for emotional faces in naturally occurring dysphoria and induced sadness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 851–860.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rogers, T., Kuiper, N., & Kirker, W. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677–688.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Salo, R., Henik, A., & Robertson, L. C. (2001). Interpreting Stroop interference: An analysis of differences between task versions. Neuropsychology, 15, 462–471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scher, C. D., Ingram, R. E., & Segal, Z. V. (2005). Cognitive reactivity and vulnerability: Empirical evaluation of construct activation and cognitive diatheses in unipolar depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 487–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmukle, S. C. (2005). Unreliability of the dot probe task. European Journal of Personality, 19, 595–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Segal, Z. V., & Ingram, R. E. (1994). Mood priming and construct activation in tests of cognitive vulnerability to unipolar depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 14, 663–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skre, I., Onstad, S., Torgersen, S., & Kringlen, E. (1991). High interrater reliability for the structured clinical interview for DSMIIIR axis I (SCID-I). Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 84, 167–173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vrijsen, J. N., van Oostrom, I., Speckens, A., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2013). Approach and avoidance of emotional faces in happy and sad mood. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 37, 1–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wells, T. T., Beevers, C. G., Robinson, A. E., & Ellis, A. J. (2010). Gaze behavior predicts memory bias for angry facial expressions in stable dysphoria. Emotion, 10, 894–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams, J. B., Gibbon, M., First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Davis, M., Borus, J., et al. (1992). The structured clinical interview for DSMIIIR (SCID): Multisite test–retest reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 630–636.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janna N. Vrijsen
    • 1
  • Iris van Oostrom
    • 1
  • Linda Isaac
    • 2
    • 3
  • Eni S. Becker
    • 4
  • Anne Speckens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Veterans Affairs Palo Alto HealthCare SystemPalo AltoUSA
  4. 4.Behavioural Science InstituteRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations