Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 284–295 | Cite as

The Role of Facial Feedback in the Modulation of Clinically-Relevant Ambiguity Resolution

  • Graham C. L. DaveyEmail author
  • Rebecca Sired
  • Sarah Jones
  • Frances Meeten
  • Suzanne R. Dash
Original Article

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the effect of facial expressions on clinically-relevant ambiguity resolution in a nonclinical sample. Experiment 1 investigated the effect of negative facial feedback (frowning) on a basic threat-interpretation bias procedure using a homophone spelling task and found that participants in a frowning condition interpreted significantly more threat/neutral homophones as threats than did participants in a neutral control condition. Experiment 2 investigated how frowning affected interpretation of bodily sensations. The findings indicated that participants in the frowning condition generated fewer positive consequences for bodily sensation scenarios and also rated the imagined bodily sensations as more negative and more of a cause for health concern. These effects could not simply be explained by differences in self-reported mood or by demand characteristics. These findings suggest that facial expressions have a moderating effect on the cognitive processes that contribute to clinically-relevant ambiguity resolution, and this has implications for clinical interventions.

Keywords

Emotion Facial expressions Interpretation biases Negative mood Embodiment Ambiguity resolution 

References

  1. Adelman, P. K., & Zajonc, R. B. (1989). Facial efference and the experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 249–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, D. W., & Richards, J. C. (2001). The catastrophic misinterpretation model of panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 1277–1291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barazzone, N., & Davey, G. C. L. (2009). Anger potentiates the reporting of threatening interpretations: An experimental study. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 489–495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlow, D. H. (2002). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bergen, B., Lindsay, S., Matlock, T., & Narayanan, S. (2007). Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31, 733–764.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112, 150–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2003). Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguous information: Beyond the emotion-congruent effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 294–309.Google Scholar
  8. Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgment, decision making and reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 561–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behaviour Research & Therapy, 5, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Byrne, A., & Eysenck, M. W. (1993). Individual differences in positive and negative interpretive biases. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 849–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Losch, M. E., & Kim, H. S. (1989). Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 260–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Camras, L. A., Holland, E. A., & Patterson, M. J. (1993). Facial expression. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 199–208). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  14. Cavanagh, K., & Davey, G. C. L. (2004). Access to information about harm and safety in spider fearful and non-fearful individuals: When they were good they were very very good but when they were bad they were horrid. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive approach to panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 348–351.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, D. M., Salkovskis, P. M., Ost, L.-G., Breitholtz, E., et al. (1997). Misinterpretation of bodily sensations in panic disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 203–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Davey, G. C. L. (2006). Cognitive mechanisms in fear acquisition and maintenance. In M. G. Craske, D. Hermans & D. Vansteenwegen (Eds.), Fear and learning: From basic processes to clinical implications (pp. 99–116). Washington, DC, US.Google Scholar
  19. Davey, G. C. L., Bickerstaffe, S., & MacDonald, B. A. (2006). Experienced disgust causes a negative interpretation bias: A causal role for disgust in anxious psychopathology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1375–1384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davey, G. C. L., Hampton, J., Farrell, J., & Davidson, S. (1992). Some characteristics of worrying: Evidence for worrying and anxiety as separate constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davis, J. I., Senghas, A., & Ochsner, K. N. (2009). How does facial feedback modulate emotional experience? Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 822–829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dimberg, U., & Söderkvist, S. (2011). The voluntary facial action technique: A method to test the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 35, 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duclos, S. E., Laird, J. D., Schneider, E., Sexter, M., Stern, L., & Van Lighten, O. (1989). Emotion-specific effects of facial expressions and postures on emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ekman, P., Levenson, R. W., & Friesen, W. V. (1983). Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes between emotions. Science, 22L, 1208–1210.Google Scholar
  25. Eysenck, M. W., Macleod, C., & Mathews, A. (1987). Cognitive functioning and anxiety. Psychological Research, 49, 189–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flack, W. F., Laird, J. D., & Cavallaro, L. A. (1999). Separate and combined effects of facial expressions and bodily postures on emotional feelings. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fulton, J., Marcus, D. K., & Merkey, T. (2011). Irrational health beliefs and health anxiety. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 527–538.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hadwin, J., Frost, S., French, C. C., & Richards, A. (1997). Cognitive processing and trait anxiety in typically developing children evidence for an interpretation bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 486–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Halberstadt, J. B., Niedenthal, P. M., & Kushner, J. (1995). Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional state. Psychological Science, 6, 278–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harrigan, J. A., & O’Connell, D. M. (1996). How do you look when feeling anxious? Facial displays of anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., Gutowski, K. A., Lucarelli, M. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2010). Cosmetic use of botulinum toxin-A affects processing of emotional language. Psychological Science, 21, 895–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hertel, P. T., Mathews, A., Peterson, S., & Kinter, K. (2003). Transfer of training emotionally biased interpretations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 775–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hess, U., Kappas, A., McHugo, G. J., Lanzetta, J. T., & Kleck, R. E. (1992). The facilitative effects of facial expression on the self-generation of emotion. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 12, 251–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoch, J. S. (1984). Availability and interference in predictive judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 649–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Huppert, J. D., Pasupuleti, R. V., Foa, E. B., & Mathews, A. (2007). Interpretation biases in social anxiety: Response generation, response selection, and self-appraisals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1505–1515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laird, J. D. (1974). Self-attribution of emotion: The effects of expressive behaviour on the quality of emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 475–486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laird, J. D., Cuniff, M., Sheehan, K., Shulman, D., & Strum, G. (1989). Emotion specific effects of facial expressions on memory for life events. In D. Kuiken (Ed) Mood and memory: Theory, research and applications (Special Issue). Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 4, 87–98.Google Scholar
  38. Larsen, R. J., Kasimatis, M., & Frey, K. (1992). Facilitating the furrowed brow: An unobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis applied to unpleasant affect. Cognition and Emotion, 6(5), 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Levenson, R. W., Eckman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). Voluntary facial action generates emotion-specific autonomic nervous system activity. Psychophysiology, 27, 363–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacLeod, C., & Cohen, I. L. (1993). Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguity: A text comprehension study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 238–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marcus, D. K., Gurley, J. R., Marchi, M. M., & Bauer, C. (2007). Cognitive and perceptual variables in hypochondriasis and health anxiety: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 127–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (2000). Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 602–615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2002). Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 167–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mathews, A., Richards, A., & Eysenck, M. (1989). Interpretation of homophones related to threat in anxiety-states. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 31–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McIntosh, D. N. (1996). Facial feedback hypotheses: Evidence, implications and directions. Motivation & Emotion, 20, 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Michalak, J., Troje, N. F., & Heidenreich, T. (2010). Embodied effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 68, 312–313.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 809–848.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., & Hallowell, N. (1994). Attentional bias to threats: Roles of trait anxiety, stressful events, and awareness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 841–864.Google Scholar
  50. Neidenthal, P. M. (2010). Emotion concepts. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), The handbook of emotion (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  51. Richards, A., & French, C. C. (1992). An anxiety-related bias in semantic activation when processing threat/neutral homographs. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 503–525.Google Scholar
  52. Richards, A., Reynolds, A., & French, C. C. (1993). Anxiety and the spelling and use in sentences of threat/neutral homophones. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 12, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Russo, R., Patterson, N., Roberson, D., Stevenson, N., & Upward, J. (1996). Emotional value of information and its relevance in the interpretation of homophones in anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schwartz, G. E., Fair, P. L., Salt, P., Mandel, M. R., & Klerman, G. L. (1976). Facial expression and imagery in depression: An electromyographic study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38, 337–347.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1987). How do I feel about it?: The informative function of affective states. In K. Fiedler & J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition and social behavior. Toronto: Hogrefe International.Google Scholar
  56. Sinha, R. (1996). Multivariate response patterning of fear and anger. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 173–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Soussignan, R. (2002). Duchenne smile, emotional experience, and autonomic reactivity: A test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Emotion, 2, 52–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile—a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 768–777.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tassinary, L. G., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1992). Unobservable facial actions and emotion. Psychological Science, 3, 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tassinary, L. G., Cacioppo, J. T., & Geen, T. R. (1989). A psychometric study of surface electrode placements for facial electromyographic recording. 1. The brow and cheek muscle regions. Psychophysiology, 26, 1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tversky, A., & Kahnemann, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson, E. J., MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Rutherford, E. M. (2006). The causal role of interpretive bias in anxiety reactivity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 103–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zajonc, R. B., Murphy, S. T., & Ingelhart, M. (1989). Feeling and facial efference: Implications of the vascular theory of emotions. Psychological Review, 96, 395–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The z. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham C. L. Davey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rebecca Sired
    • 1
  • Sarah Jones
    • 1
  • Frances Meeten
    • 1
  • Suzanne R. Dash
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations