Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 36, Issue 5, pp 493–501 | Cite as

Too Much of a Good Thing: Testing the Efficacy of a Cognitive Bias Modification Task for Cognitively Vulnerable Individuals

  • Gerald J. Haeffel
  • David C. Rozek
  • Jennifer L. Hames
  • Jessica Technow
Original Article

Abstract

A growing body of research indicates that cognitive bias modification (CBM) may be an effective intervention for individuals with anxiety. However, few studies have tested whether CBM works for other disorders characterized by negative cognitive biases such as depression. This experiment tested the efficacy of CBM for altering depressogenic self-worth biases. Consistent with hypotheses, results showed that CBM was more effective than a control condition in teaching participants a more adaptive cognitive style (i.e., increased attention for adaptive self-worth stimuli). Those who successfully learned a more adaptive style reported fewer depressive symptoms and exhibited greater persistence (i.e., less helplessness) on a difficult laboratory task. However, the task proved difficult for cognitively vulnerable participants; they were not able to maintain their new learning over the entire course of the CBM training. Rather, their negative cognitive bias began to re-emerge after only 20 learning trials. These results indicate that CBM attention training might be most effective in reducing cognitive vulnerability when initially used in small doses.

Keywords

Depression Cognitive vulnerability Cognitive bias modification Attention 

References

  1. Abramson, L. Y., Alloy, L. B., Hankin, B. L., Haeffel, G. J., MacCoon, D. G., & Gibb, B. E. (2002). Cognitive vulnerability-stress models of depression in a self-regulatory and psychobiological context. In I. H. Gotlib & C. L. Hammen (Eds.), Handbook of depression. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  2. Abramson, L. Y., Alloy, L. B., Hogan, M. E., Whitehouse, W. G., Donovan, P., Rose, D., et al. (1999). Cognitive vulnerability to depression: Theory and evidence. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 13, 5–20.Google Scholar
  3. Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 96, 358–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Hogan, M. E., Whitehouse, W. G., Rose, D. T., Robinson, M. S., et al. (2000). The Temple-Wisconsin cognitive vulnerability to depression project: Lifetime history of axis I psychopathology in individuals at high and low cognitive risk for depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 403–418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Whitehouse, W. G., Hogan, M. E., Panzarella, C., & Rose, D. T. (2006). Prospective incidence of first onsets and recurrences of depression in individuals at high and low cognitive risk for depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 145–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amir, N., Beard, C., Burns, M., & Bomyea, J. (2009). Attention modification program in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 28–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baert, S., De Raedt, R., Schacht, R., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Attentional bias training in depression: Therapeutic effects depend on depression severity. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 265–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). Word frequency book. New York: American Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Carter, R. M., Hofstotter, C., Tsuchiya, N., & Koch, C. (2003). Working memory and fear conditioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 100, 1399–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diamond, A., & Kirkham, N. (2005). Not quite as grown-up as we like to think—parallels between cognition in childhood and adulthood. Psychological Science, 16, 291–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erskine, J.A., Georgiou, G.J., & Kvavilashvili, L. (in press). I suppress, therefore I smoke: Effects of thought suppression on smoking behavior. Psychological Science. Google Scholar
  14. Gibb, B. E., Beevers, C. G., Andover, M. S., & Holleran, K. (2006). The hopelessness theory of depression: A prospective multi-wave test of the vulnerability-stress hypothesis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30, 763–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haeffel, G. J., Gibb, B. E., Abramson, L. Y., Alloy, L. B., Metalsky, G. I., Joiner, T., et al. (2008). Measuring cognitive vulnerability to depression: Development and validation of the cognitive style questionnaire. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 824–836.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haeffel, G. J., Abramson, L. Y., Brazy, P., Shah, J., Teachman, B., & Nosek, B. (2007). Explicit and implicit cognition: A preliminary test of a dual-process theory of cognitive vulnerability. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1155–1167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haeffel, G. J., & Mathew, A. R. (2010). Inside thoughts and outside influences: Cognitive vulnerability moderates the effect of decreases in perceived social support on depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 283–302.Google Scholar
  18. Hakamata, Y., Lissek, S., Bar-Haim, Y., Britton, J. C., Fox, N. A., Leibenluft, E., et al. (2010). Attention bias modification treatment: A meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 68, 982–990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hankin, B. L. (2005). Childhood maltreatment and psychopathology: Prospective tests of attachment, cognitive vulnerability, and stress as mediating processes. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 645–671.Google Scholar
  20. Hankin, B. L., Abramson, L. Y., Miller, N., & Haeffel, G. J. (2004). Cognitive vulnerability-stress theories of depression: Examining affective specificity in the prediction of depression versus anxiety in three prospective studies. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 309–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hankin, B. L., Abramson, L. Y., Moffitt, T. E., Silva, P., McGee, R., & Angell, K. E. (1998). Development of depression from preadolescence to young adulthood: Emerging gender differences in a 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 128–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hollon, S. D., Thase, M. E., & Markowitz, J. C. (2002). Treatment and prevention of depression. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 3, 39–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holmes, E. A., Lang, T. J., & Shah, D. M. (2009). Developing interpretation bias modification as a “cognitive vaccine” for depressed mood: Imagining positive events makes you feel better than thinking about them verbally. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 76–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Joormann, J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2007). Selective attention to emotional faces following recovery from depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 80–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Joormann, J., Hertel, P. T., LeMoult, J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2009). Training forgetting of negative material in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 34–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., Marshuetz, C., Koeppe, R. A., & Reuter-Lorenze, P. A. (1998). Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 8410–8413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koster, E. H. W., Fox, E., & MacLeod, C. (2009). Introduction to the special section on cognitive bias modification in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 1–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li, S., Tan, J., Qian, M., & Liu, X. (2008). Continual training of attentional bias in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 905–912.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lyubomirsky, S., Tucker, K. L., Caldwell, N. D., & Berg, K. (1999). Why ruminators are poor problem solvers: clues from the phenomenology of dysphoric rumination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1041–1060.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L., Ebsworthy, G., & Holker, L. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 107–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005). Why won’t you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. Child Development, 76, 883–899.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Metalsky, G. I., & Joiner, T. E. (1992). Vulnerability to depressive symptomatology: A prospective test of the diathesis-stress and causal mediation components of the hopelessness theory of depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 667–675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mogg, K., Mathews, A., Bird, C., & MacGregor-Morris, R. (1990). Effects of stress and anxiety on the processing of threat stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1230–1237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. N., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 400–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ray, R. D., Ochsner, K. N., Cooper, J. C., Robertson, E. R., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Gross, J. J. (2005). Individual differences in trait rumination and the neural systems supporting cognitive reappraisal. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reber, P. J., & Kotovsky, K. (1997). Implicit learning in problem solving: The role of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 178–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306, 443–447.Google Scholar
  40. Salemink, E., van den Hout, M., & Kindt, M. (2007). Trained interpretive bias and anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 329–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sarin, S., Abela, J. R. Z., & Auerbach, R. P. (2005). The response styles theory of depression: A test of specificity and causal mediation.  Cognition and Emotion, 19, 751–761.Google Scholar
  42. Schmidt, N. B., Richey, J. A., Buckner, J. D., & Timpano, K. R. (2009). Attention training for generalized social anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 5–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. See, J., MacLeod, C., & Bridle, R. (2009). The reduction of anxiety vulnerability through the modification of attentional bias: A real world study using a home-based cognitive bias modification procedure. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 65–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tresselt, M. E., & Mayzner, M. (1966). Normative times for a sample of 134 solution words and 378 associated anagrams. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1, 293–298.Google Scholar
  45. Watkins, E., & Brown, R. G. (2002). Rumination and executive function in depression: an experimental study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 72, 400–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., Weber, K., Assenheimer, J. S., Strauss, M. E., & McCormick, R. A. (1995). Testing a tripartite model: II. Exploring the symptom structure of anxiety and depression in student, adult, and patient samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 15–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wells, T. T., & Beevers, C. G. (2010). Biased attention and dysphoria: Manipulating selective attention reduces subsequent depressive symptoms. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 719–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson, E. J., MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Rutherford, E. M. (2006). The causal role of interpretive bias in anxiety reactivity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 103–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald J. Haeffel
    • 1
  • David C. Rozek
    • 1
  • Jennifer L. Hames
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jessica Technow
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations