Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 66–82 | Cite as

The Efficacy of Problem-Focused and Emotional Approach Interventions Varies as a Function of Emotional Processing Style

  • John P. Baker
  • Howard Berenbaum
Original Article

Abstract

This study examined whether individual differences in emotional processing style (e.g., attention to and clarity of emotions) moderated the effectiveness of emotional approach and problem-focused interventions. Forty-one college freshmen were randomly assigned to one of two adjustment-to-college interventions: (a) an emotional approach intervention in which participants described their feelings, the sources of these feelings, and were provided with feedback about their feelings; or (b) a problem-focused intervention in which participants discussed how to solve their problems. Positive affect, negative affect, and anhedonic depression were measured before the intervention and 2 weeks subsequent to the intervention. Dimensions of emotional processing style were assessed using self-report. Participants low in attention to emotions benefited more from the emotional approach intervention, whereas those high in attention benefited more from the problem-focused intervention.

Keywords

Coping Emotion Stress Problem-focused Emotional processing style 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We express our appreciation to the numerous individuals who provided feedback and clarification concerning particular points made in this article, including Mark Reinecke, Cara Raymond, Cara Hurley, Angela Picot, Court Tisdale, Randy Horton, and Julianne Biswurm Baker.

References

  1. Bagby, R. M., Taylor, G. J., & Parker, J. D. A. (1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale—II: convergent, discriminant, & concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 33–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, J. P., & Berenbaum, H. (2007). Emotion-focused and problem-focused coping: A comparision of potentially adaptive strategies. Cognition and Emotion, 21(1), 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billings, D. W., Folkman, S., Acree, M., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2000). Coping and physical health during caregiving: The roles of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 131–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clore, G. L., Wyer, R. S., Dienes, B., Gasper, K., Gohm, C., & Isbell, L. (1998). Affective feelings as feedback: Some cognitive consequences. In L. L. Martin, & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Mood and social cognition (pp. 1–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Coffey, E., Berenbaum, H., & Kerns J. K. (2003). The dimensions of emotional intelligence, alexithymia, and mood awareness: Associations with personality and performance on an emotional stroop task. Cognition & Emotion, 17, 671–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, S., Underwood, L. G., & Gottlieb, B. H. (2000). Social relationships and health. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention (pp. 3–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coyne, J., Aldwin, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Depression and coping in stressful episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 439–447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coyne, J. C., & Racioppo, M. W. (2000). Closing the gap between coping research and clinical intervention research. The American Psychologist, 55, 655–664.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunkel-Schetter, C., Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1987). Correlates of social support receipt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 71–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. D’Zurilla, T. J., & Chang, E. C. (1995). The relations between social problem solving and coping. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. (1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844–854.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feldman Barett, L., Gross, J. J., Christensen, T. C., & Benvenuto, M. (2001). Knowing what you’re feeling and knowing what to do about it: Mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 713–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2000). Positive affect and the other side of coping. The American Psychologist, 55, 647–654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gohm, C. L., & Clore, G. L. (2000). Individual differences in emotional experience: Mapping available scales to processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 679–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gohm, C. L, & Clore, G. L. (2002). Four latent traits of emotional experience and their involvement in well-being, coping, and attributional style. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 495–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenberg, L. S. (2002). Emotion-focused therapy: Coaching clients to work through their feelings. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  19. Greenberg, L. S., & Watson, J. C. (2006). Emotion-focused therapy for depression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  20. House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241, 540–545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King, L. A., & Emmons, R. A. (1990). Conflict over emotional expression: Psychological and physical correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 864–877.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Langens, T. A., & Schuler, J. (2005). Written emotional expression and emotional well-being: The moderating role of fear of rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 818–830.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Lumley, M. A. (2004). Alexithymia, emotional disclosure, and health: A program of research. Journal of Personality, 72, 830–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lutgendorf, S. K., & Antoni, M. H. (1999). Emotional and cognitive processing in a trauma disclosure paradigm. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 23, 423–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moskowitz, J. T., Folkman, S., Collette, L., & Vittinghoff, E. (1996). Coping and mood during AIDS-related caregiving and bereavement. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nezu, A. M., & Nezu, C. M. (1991). Clinical decision making in behavior therapy: A problem-solving perspective. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  28. Nezu, A. M., Nezu, C. M., McClure, K. S., Felgoise, S. H., & Houts, P. S. (2003). Project genesis: Assessing the efficacy of problem-solving therapy for distressed cancer patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 1036–1048.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nezu, A. M., Nezu, C. M., & Perri, M. G. (1989). Problem-solving therapy for depression. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Nitschke, J. B., Heller, W., Imig, J. C., McDonald, R. P., & Miller, G. A. (2001). Distinguishing dimensions of anxiety and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Parker, L. E., & Larson, J. (1994). Ruminative coping with depressed mood following loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 92–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paez, D., Basabe, N., Valdoseda, M., Velasco, C., & Iraurgi, I. (1995). Confrontation: Inhibition, alexithymia, and health. In J. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, & health (pp. 195–222). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  33. Paez, D., Velasco, C., & Gonzalez, J. L. (1999). Expressive writing and the role of alexythimia as a dispositional deficit in self-disclosure and psychological health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 630–641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Park, C. L., & Blumberg, C. J. (2002). Disclosing trauma through writing: Testing the meaning-making hypothesis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26, 597–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pennebaker, J. W., & Francis, M. E. (1996). Cognitive, emotional, and language processes in disclosure. Cognition & Emotion, 10, 601–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Revenson, T. A., & Felton, B. J. (1989). Disability and coping as predictors of psychological adjustment to rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 344–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Safran, J. D., & Greenberg, L. S. (1991). Emotion, psychotherapy, and change. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  38. Salano, L., Donati, V., Pecci, F., Persichetti, S., & Colaci, A. (2003). Postoperative course after papilloma resection: Effects of written disclosure of the experience in subjects with different alexithymia levels. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Salovey, P., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B., & Mayer, J. D. (1999). Coping intelligently: Emotional intelligence and the coping process. In C. R. Synder (Eds.), Coping: The psychology of what works (pp. 141–164). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. P. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the trait meta-mood scale. In J. Pennebaker (Eds.), Emotion, Disclosure, & Health (pp. 125–154). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  41. Smyth, J. M. (1998). Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 174–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., Cameron, C. L., & Ellis, A. P. (1994). Coping through emotional approach: Problems of conceptualization and confounding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 350–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stanton, A. L., Kirk, S. B., Cameron, C. L., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2000). Coping through emotional approach: Scale construction and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1150–1169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1991). ‘The Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire’. Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  46. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Carey, G. (1988). Positive and negative affectivity and their relation to anxiety and depressive disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 346–353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Watson, D., Weber, K., Assenheimer, J. S., Clark, L. A., Strauss, M. E., & McCormick, R. A. (1995). Testing a tripartite model: I. Evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of anxiety and depression symptom scales. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 3–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northwestern Memorial HospitalChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations