Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 149–160 | Cite as

Differential Effects of Rumination and Dysphoria on the Inhibition of Irrelevant Emotional Material: Evidence from a Negative Priming Task

  • Jutta JoormannEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Rumination has been linked to a heightened vulnerability for the development of depression. However, it still remains unclear which cognitive processes underlie individual differences in rumination. The present study investigates whether deficits in the inhibition of irrelevant emotional stimuli in working memory are related to individual differences in ruminative responses to negative mood states and negative life events. Using the Response Style Questionnaire (RSQ), high and low scorers’ performance in a negative affective priming task in which participants were asked for self-referential judgments was evaluated. The results show significant inhibition for emotional words in the participants who scored low on the RSQ but no inhibition for emotional words in the participants who scored high on the RSQ. These group differences remained significant when controlling for current depression scores suggesting that irrespective of differences in depressive symptomatology, rumination and inhibitory dysfunctions are closely related.

Keywords

Depression Rumination Inhibition Attention Memory 

References

  1. Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, R. N., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000). Cognitive inflexibility among ruminators and nonruminators. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 699–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Frith, C. D. (1979). Consciousness, information processing and schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 225–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gotlib, I. H., & Cane, D. B. (1989). Self-report assessment of depression and anxiety. In P. C. Kendall, & D. E. Watson (Eds.), Anxiety and depression: Distinctive and overlapping features (pp. 131–169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 404–411.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Greve, K. W., Ingram, F., & Bianchini, K. J. (1998). Latent structure of the wisconsin card sorting test in a clinical sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13, 597–609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greve, K. W., Stickle, T. R., Love, J. M., Bianchini, K. J., & Stanford, M. S. (2005). Latent structure of the wisconsin card sorting test: A confirmatory factor analytic study. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 355–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hager, W., & Hasselhorn, M. (1994). Handbuch deutschsprachiger Wortnormen. [Handbook of German word norms]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  10. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation Vol. 22 (pp. 193–225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hasher, L., Stoltzfus, E. R., Zacks, R. T., & Rypma, B. (1991). Age and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 163–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hertel, P. T. (1997). On the contribution of deficient cognitive control to memory impairments in depression. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 569–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hertel, P. T., & Gerstle, M. (2003). Depression-related deficits in forgetting. Psychological Science, 14, 573–578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Joormann, J. (2004). Attentional bias in dysphoria: The role of inhibitory processes. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Joormann, J. (2005). Inhibition, rumination, and mood regulation in depression. In R. W. Engle, G. Sedek, U. von Hecker, & D. N. McIntosh (Eds.), Cognitive limitations in aging and psychopathology: attention, working memory, and executive functions (pp. 275–312). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Just, N., & Alloy, L. B. (1997). The response styles theory of depression: Tests and an extension of the theory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(2), 221–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Linville, P. (1996). Attention inhibition: Does it underlie ruminative thought? In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), Ruminative thoughts. Advances in social cognition, Vol. 9 (pp. 121–133). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Lyubomirsky, S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1993). Self-perpetuating properties of dysphoric rumination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 339–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (1996). Some ruminative thoughts. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), Advances in Social Cognition (pp. 1–7). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, G. M., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 40–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. N Dempster, & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207–261). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Nolan, S. A., Roberts, J. E., & Gotlib, I. H. (1998). Neuroticism and ruminative response style as predictors of change in depressive symptomatology. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22(5), 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991). A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 115–121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 569–582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000). The role of rumination in depressive disorders and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 504–511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Morrow, J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1993). Response styles and the duration of episodes of depressed mood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(1),20–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Parker, L. E., & Larson, J. (1994). Ruminative coping with depressed mood following loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 92–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale. A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Journal of Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.Google Scholar
  29. Roberts, J. E., Gilboa, E., & Gotlib, I. H. (1998). Ruminative response style and vulnerability to episodes of dysphoria: Gender, neuroticism, and episode duration. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: inhibitory processes by ignored objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 571–590.Google Scholar
  31. Tipper, S. P., Bourque, T. A., Anderson, S. H., & Brehaut, J. C. (1989). Mechanisms of attention: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 353–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wegner, D. M. (1988). Stress and mental control. In S. Fisher, & J. Reason (Eds.), Handbook of life stress, cognition and health.; handbook of life stress, cognition and health (pp. 683–697). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  34. Wenzlaff, R. M., Wegner, D. M., & Roper, D. W. (1988). Depression and mental control: The resurgence of unwanted negative thoughts. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 55, 882–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations