Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 273–289 | Cite as

Cognitive Bias in Men's Processing of Negative Social Information: The Role of Social Anxiety, Toughness as a Masculine Role Norm, and Their Interaction

Article

Cognitive approaches to social anxiety focus on a person's tendency to make biased judgments for threat-relevant stimuli. This notion was tested relative to whether men's adherence to a toughness male role norm moderates the relation between social anxiety and biased judgments for negative interpersonal events. For negative interpersonal events not involving male role norms, results indicated that only social anxiety was related to probability estimates, while for cost estimates there was a unique association for social anxiety and a significant social anxiety by toughness interaction such that men who were high in both made greater cost estimates. For events involving explicit male role norms, social anxiety and toughness evidenced unique relationships with probability estimates. For cost estimates, in addition to unique associations for social anxiety and toughness, there was a significant interaction, which showed that men high in both characteristics gave the highest cost ratings.

KEY WORDS:

cognitive bias cognitive models of social anxiety shyness masculine ideology gender role-conflict 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author expresses appreciation to Eric Deemer and Shaden Sousou for their assistance in conducting this research.

REFERENCES

  1. Arkin, R. M., Lake, E. A., & Baumgardner, A. B. (1986). Shyness and self-presentation. In W. H. Jones, J. M. Cheek, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Shyness: Perspectives on research and treatment (pp. 189–203). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, M. W., & Ferguson, P. (2001). Relational schemas: The activation of interpersonal knowledge structures in social anxiety. In W. R. Crozier & L. E. Alden (Eds.), International handbook of social anxiety: Concepts, research, and intervention relating to self and shyness (pp. 235–257). Sussex, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, M. W., & Regehr, C. (1998). Assimilation/contrast effects in priming of evaluative expectations. Unpublished data, University of Winnipeg, Canada.Google Scholar
  4. Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture's blueprint for manhood and what it's done for us lately. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–48). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  5. Brannon, R., & Juni, S. (1984). A scale for measuring attitudes to masculinity. Psychological Document, 14(6), (Ms. 2012).Google Scholar
  6. Bruch, M. A. (2002). Shyness and toughness: Unique and moderated relations with men's emotional expression. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruch, M. A., Berko, E., & Haase, R. F. (1998). Shyness, masculine ideology, physical attractiveness, and emotional inexpressiveness: Testing a mediational model of men's interpersonal competence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruch, M. A., Gorsky, J. M., Collins, T. M., & Berger, P. A. (1989). Shyness and sociability reexamined: A multicomponent analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 904–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheek, J. M., & Melchoir, L. A. (1990). Shyness, self-esteem, and self-consciousness. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.), Handbook of social and evaluative anxiety (pp. 47–82). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, D. M. (2001). A cognitive perspective on social phobia. In W. R. Crozier & L. E. Alden (Eds.), International handbook of social anxiety: Concepts, research and intervention relating to the self and shyness (pp. 405–429). Sussex, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69–93). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Akin, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation: Regression analyses for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Crozier, W. R., & Alden, L. E. (2001). The social nature of social anxiety. In W. R. Crozier & L. E. Alden (Eds.), International handbook of social anxiety: Concepts, research, and interventions relating to self and shyness (pp. 1–20). Sussex, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. David, D., & Brannon, R. (Eds.). (1976). The forty nine percent solution: The male sex role. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, A. R., Tokar, D. M., Good, G. E., & Snell, A. F. (1998). More on the structure of male role norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foa, E. B., Franklin, M. E., Perry, K. J., & Herbert, J. D. (1996). Cognitive bias in generalized social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 433–439.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1985). Treatment of anxiety disorders: Implications for psychopathology. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders, (pp. 421–452). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 20–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia, S., Stinson, L., Ickes, W., Bissonnette, V., & Briggs, S. R. (1991). Shyness and physical attractiveness in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heimberg, R. G., & Juster, H. R. (1996). Cognitive-behavioral treatments: Literature review. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 261–309). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  22. Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 456–470.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hofmann, S. G. (2004). Cognitive mediation of treatment change in social phobia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 392–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hopko, D. R., Stowell, J., Jones, W. H., & Armento, M. E. A. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 185–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kimmel, M. S. (1987). Rethinking “masculinity”! New directions in research. In M. S. Kimmel (Ed.), Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity (pp. 9–24). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Mahalik, J. R. (1999). Incorporating a gender role strain perspective in assessing and treating men's cognitive distortions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mattick, R. P., & Clark, J. C. (1998). Development and validation of measures of social phobia, scrutiny fear, and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 455–470.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. McCelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Meleshko, K. G. A., & Alden, L. E. (1993). Anxiety and self-disclosure: Toward a motivational model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1000–1009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mills, R. S. L., & Rubin, K. H. (1993). Socialization factors in the development of social withdrawal. In K. H. Rubin & J. B. Asendorpf (Eds.), Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness in childhood (pp. 117–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. O’Neil, J. M., Good, G. E., & Holmes, S. (1995). Fifteen years of research on men's gender role conflict: New paradigms for empirical research. In R. Levent & W. Pollack (Eds.), Foundations for a new psychology of men (pp. 164–206). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pleck, J. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm. An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), The new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. Rheingold, A. A., Herbert, J. D., & Franklin, M. E. (2003). Cognitive bias in adolescents with social anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 639–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sinn, J. S. (1997). The predictive and discriminant validity of masculine ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spence, S. H., Donovan, C., & Brechman-Toussaint, M. (1999). Social skills, social outcomes, and cognitive features of childhood social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 211–221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson, E. H., Pleck, J. H., & Ferrera, D. L. (1993). Men and masculinities: Scales for masculinity ideology and masculinity-related constructs. Sex Roles, 27, 573–607.Google Scholar
  39. Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448–457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wolfe, R. N., Lennox, R. D., & Cutler, B. L. (1986). Getting along and getting ahead: Empirical support for a theory of protective and acquisitive self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 356–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational and Counseling PsychologyUniversity at AlbanyAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Educational and Counseling PsychologyUniversity at AlbanyAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations