Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 787–802 | Cite as

Links Between Parenting and Core Beliefs: Preliminary Psychometric Validation of the Young Parenting Inventory

  • Alex Sheffield
  • Glenn Waller
  • Francesca Emanuelli
  • James Murray
  • Caroline Meyer
Article

Abstract

This study describes the psychometric validation of the young parenting inventory (YPI), and tested specific hypotheses regarding the link between one’s experience of their parent’s behaviors and the development of schema-level core beliefs. The YPI is a measure of perceived parenting experiences, hypothesized to represent the origins of negative core beliefs. This preliminary validation consisted of analyses of factor structure, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and construct validity. A large non-clinical student sample (N = 422) completed the YPI, and a subset also completed the Young Schema Questionnaire-Short form (YSQ-S). Factor analyses demonstrated that a shorter version of the questionnaire (YPI-R) could be developed to represent coherent and meaningful perceptions of each parent. The YPI-R consists of nine scales. Each scale had good test–retest reliability and adequate internal consistency. Significant associations between the YPI-R scales and negative core beliefs (as measured by the YSQ-S) indicated partial construct validity. At this preliminary stage, it can be concluded that the YPI-R has an acceptable level of psychometric utility. However, the hypothesized parenting-negative core belief links were not all substantiated.

Key Words

family functioning parenting core beliefs validation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball, S. A., & Cecero, J. J. (2001). Addicted patients with personality disorders: Traits, schemas, and presenting problems. Journal of Personality Disorders, 15, 72–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss. New Scale. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
  4. Carlson, E. A. (1998). A prospective longitudinal study of disorganized/disoriented attachment. Child Development, 69, 1107–1128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Friedman, M. S., McDermut, W. H., Solomon, D. A., Ryan, C. E., Keitner, G. I., & Miller, I. W. (1997). Family functioning and mental illness: a comparison of psychiatric and non-clinical families. Family Process, 36, 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leung, N., Thomas, G. V., & Waller, G. (2000). The relationship between parental bonding and core beliefs in anorexic and bulimic women. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Leung, N., Waller, G., & Thomas, G. V. (1999). Core beliefs in anorexic and bulimic women. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 187, 736–741.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Murray, C., Waller, G., & Legg, C. (2000). Family dysfunction and bulimic psychopathology: The mediating role of shame. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 25, 319–326.Google Scholar
  10. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Parker, G. (1983). Parental overprotection: A risk factor in psychosocial development. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  12. Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B. (1979). A parental bonding instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52, 1–10.Google Scholar
  13. Stopa, L., Thorne, P., Waters, A., & Preston, J. (2001). Are the short and long forms of the Young Schema Questionnaire comparable and how well does each version predict psychopathology scores? Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 15, 253–272.Google Scholar
  14. Waller, G., Meyer, C., & Ohanian, V. (2001). Psychometric properties of the long and short versions of the Young Schema Questionnaire: Core beliefs among bulimic and comparison women. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Warren, S. L., Huston, L., Egeland, B., & Sroufe, L. A. (1997). Child and adolescent anxiety disorders and early attachment. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 637–644.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Welburn, K., Coristine, M., Dagg, P., Ponefract, A., & Jordan, S. (2002). The Schema Questionnaire-Short Form: Factor analysis and relationship between schemas and symptoms. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Young, J. E. (1998). Young Schema Questionnaire–short form (YSQ-S) (On-line). New York: Cognitive Therapy Centre. (Available: http://www.schematherapy.com).
  18. Young, J. E. (1999a). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema focused approach (3rd ed.). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange.Google Scholar
  19. Young, J. E. (1999b). Young Parenting Inventory (YPI) (On-line). New York: Cognitive Therapy Centre. (Available: http://www.schematherapy.com).
  20. Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Sheffield
    • 1
    • 6
  • Glenn Waller
    • 2
  • Francesca Emanuelli
    • 3
  • James Murray
    • 4
  • Caroline Meyer
    • 5
  1. 1.Vincent Square ClinicLondon
  2. 2.St. George’s Hospital Medical SchoolUniversity of LondonLondon
  3. 3.St. George’s Hospital Medical SchoolUniversity of LondonLondon
  4. 4.University of SurreySurrey
  5. 5.University of WarwickWarwick
  6. 6.Vincent Square ClinicLondon

Personalised recommendations