Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 107–121 | Cite as

The Metacognitive Model of GAD: Assessment of Meta-Worry and Relationship With DSM-IV Generalized Anxiety Disorder

  • Adrian Wells
Article

Abstract

The metacognitive model of GAD places negative metacognitive beliefs and meta-worry as central in the development and maintenance of disorder. The present study examined the psychometric properties of the Meta-worry Questionnaire (MWQ) and used it to test hypotheses derived from the metacognitive model in the context of DSM-IV GAD. The MWQ was found to possess very good internal reliability, and both frequency and belief scales were found to consist of single factors. The scales correlated meaningfully with existing measures of worry and metacognition. Consistent with hypotheses individuals meeting criteria for GAD showed significantly higher meta-worry frequency scores than individuals classified as somatic anxiety or no anxiety. Meta-worry belief distinguished the GAD group from the non-anxious group but not the somatic anxiety group. These effects remained when Type 1 worry (social and health worry) was controlled. The results provide further support for the metacognitive model. Relationship between meta-worry frequency, belief, and GAD status was explored using path analysis. The relationship between meta-worry belief and GAD classification was dependent on meta-worry frequency.

Key words

generalized anxiety disorder metacognition worry meta-worry assessment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on multiplying factors for various chi-square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16, 296–298.Google Scholar
  3. Borkovec, T. D. (1994). The nature, functions and origins of worry. In G. C. L. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives in theory, assessment and treatment. (pp. 5–34). Chichester, UK: wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Borkovec, T. D., Robinson, E., Pruzinsky, T., & DePree, J. A. (1983). Preliminary exploration of worry: Some characteristics and processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21, 9–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Borkovec, T. D., & Inz, J. (1990). The nature of worry in Generalised Anxiety Disorder: A predominance of thought activity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 153–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Borkovec, T. D., & Roemer, L. (1995). Perceived functions of worry among generalised anxiety subjects: Distraction from more emotionally distressing topics? Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26, 25–30.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, G., Wells, A., & Dewick, H. (1995). Differential effects of worry and imagery after exposure to a stressful stimulus: A pilot study. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cartwright-Hatton, S., & Wells, A. (1997). Beliefs about worry and intrusions: The Metacognitions Questionnaire. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 279–315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Catell, R. B. (1966). The Scree test for number of factors. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 1, 245-276.Google Scholar
  10. Dugas, M. J., Gagnon, F., Ladouceur, R., & Freeston, M. H. (1998). Generalized anxiety disorder: A preliminary test of a conceptual model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 215–226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher, P. L., & Durham, R. C. (1999). Recovery rates in generalized anxiety disorder following psychological therapy: An analysis of clinically significant change in the STAI-T across outcome studies since 1990. Psychological Medicine, 29, 1425–1434.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Holeva, V., Tarrier, N. T., & Wells, A. (2001). Prevalence and predictors of acute stress disorder and PTSD following road traffic accidents: Thought control strategies and social support. Behavior Therapy, 32, 65–83.Google Scholar
  13. Kaiser, H. F. (1970). “A Second Generation Little Jiffy.” Psychometrika, 35, 401–415.Google Scholar
  14. Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). “Little Jiffy Mark iv.” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111–117.Google Scholar
  15. Nassif, Y. (1999). Predictors of pathological worry. Unpublished M. Phil. thesis. University of Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
  16. Purdon, C. (1999). Thought suppression and psychopathology. Behavior Research and Therapy, 37, 1029–1054.Google Scholar
  17. Purdon, C. (2000, July). Metacognition and the persistence of worry. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Association of Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, Institute of Education, London, UK.Google Scholar
  18. Riskind, J. H., & Williams, N. L. (in press). A unique vulnerability to all anxiety disorders: The looming maladaptive style. In L. B. Alloy & J. H. Riskind (Eds.), Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Roemer, L., Borkovec, M., Posa, P., & Borkovec, T. D. (1995). A self diagnostic measure of generalised anxiety disorder. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26, 345–350.Google Scholar
  20. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tallis, F., Davey, G. C. L., & Capuzzo, N. (1994). The phenomenology of non-pathological worry: a preliminary investigation. In: G. C. L. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on Theory, Assessment and Treatment. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Warda, G., & Bryant, R. A. (1998). Cognitive bias in acute stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 1177–1183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R., & White, T. L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wells, A. (1994a). Attention and the control of worry. In G. C. L. Davey& F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Wells, A. (1994b). A multidimensional measure of worry: Development and preliminary validation of the Anxious Thoughts Inventory. Anxiety Stress and Coping, 6, 289–299.Google Scholar
  26. Wells, A. (1995). Meta-cognition and Worry: A cognitive Model of Generalised Anxiety Disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 301–320.Google Scholar
  27. Wells, A. (1997). Cognitive Therapy of Anxiety Disorders: A practice manual and conceptual guide. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Wells, A. (1999). A metacognitive model and therapy of generalized anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6, 86–95.Google Scholar
  29. Wells, A., & Carter, K. (1999). Preliminary tests of a cognitive model of Generalised Anxiety Disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 585–594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wells, A., & Carter, K. (2001). Further tests of a cognitive model of Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Metacognitions and worry in GAD, panic disorder, social phobia, depression, and non-patients. Behavior Therapy, 32, 85–102.Google Scholar
  31. Wells, A., & Davies, M. (1994). The Thought Control Questionnaire: A measure of individual differences in the control of unwanted thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 871–878.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wells, A., & Papageorgiou, C. (1995). Worry and the incubation of intrusive images following stress. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 579–583.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wells, A., & Papageorgiou, C. (1998). Relationships between worry, obsessive-compulsive symptoms and meta-cognitive beliefs. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 899–913.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. York, D., Borkovec, T. D., Vasey, M., & Stern, R. (1987). Effects of worry and somatic anxiety induction on thoughts, emotion and physiological activity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 25, 523–526.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian Wells
    • 1
  1. 1.Academic Division of Clinical PsychologyUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations