Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 479–499 | Cite as

Information Processing and Anxiety Sensitivity: Cognitive Vulnerability to Panic Reflected in Interpretation and Memory Biases

Article

Abstract

The relationship between panic and anxiety sensitivity (AS) has been well established. Further, cognitive theories of panic have received substantial support through demonstrations of cognitive biases toward threatening information. However, past research has produced mixed findings on whether AS is itself associated with biased information processing. To explore this question, the current study examined evidence for and relationships among attention (on a modified Stroop), interpretation (using the Brief Body Sensations Interpretation Questionnaire), and schematic/memory biases (on Implicit Association Tests) in individuals with high (N = 55) and low (N = 48) AS. Results indicated interpretation and memory biases favoring threat among the high AS group, but no attentional bias. Further, the memory bias was positively related to the interpretation bias and to measures of anxiety and panic, offering the first evidence for a schema potentially related to the development of panic. Findings are discussed regarding implications for cognitive models of vulnerability.

Keywords

anxiety sensitivity interpretation information processing bias panic schema 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barlow, D. H. (1988). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, A. T., & Emery, G. with Greenberg, R. I. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory-II Manual. San Antoino, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, J. G., Stanley, M. A., Averill, P. M., Baldwin, L. E., & Deagle, E. A., III (1992). Attention and memory for threat in panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 619–629.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive approach to panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 461–470.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, D. M. (1988). A cognitive model of panic attacks. In S. Rachman & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Panic: Psychological perspectives (pp. 71–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, D. M., Salkovskis, P. M., Öst, L. G., Breitholtz, E., Koehler, K. A., Westling, B. E., et al. (1997). Misinterpretation of body sensations in panic disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 203–213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cox, B. J., Borger, S. C., & Enns, M. W. (1999). Anxiety sensitivity and emotional disorders: Psychometric studies and their theoretical implications. In S. Taylor (Ed.), Anxiety sensitivity: Theory, research, and treatment of the fear of anxiety (pp. 115–148). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Cox, B. J., Endler, N. S., Swinson, R. P., & Norton, G. R. (1991). Situations and specific categories associated with clinical and nonclinical panic attacks. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 67–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dalgleish, T., & Watts, F. N. (1990). Biases of attention and memory in disorders of anxiety and depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donnell, C. D., & McNally, R. J. (1989). Anxiety sensitivity and history of panic as predictors of response to hyperventilation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 325–332.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2002). Predictive validity of an implicit association test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1441–1455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehlers, A., Margraf, J., Davies, S., & Roth, W. T. (1988). Selective processing of threat cues in participants with panic attack. Cognition and Emotion, 2, 201–219.Google Scholar
  15. Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenwald, A. G. (1992). New Look 3: Reclaiming unconscious cognition. American Psychologist, 47, 766–779.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenwald, A. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2001). Health of the Implicit Association Test at Age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Harvey, J. M., Richards, J. C., Dziadosz, T., & Swindell, A. (1993). Misinterpretation of ambiguous stimuli in panic disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holle, C., Neely, J. H., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). The effects of blocked versus random presentation and semantic relatedness of stimulus words on response to a modified Stroop Task among social phobics. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 681–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein, D. F. (1993). False suffocation alarms, spontaneous panics, and related conditions: An integrative hypothesis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 306–317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lundh, L. G., Czyzykow, S., & Öst, L. G. (1997). Explicit and implicit memory bias in panic disorder with agoraphobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 1003–1014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lundh, L. G., Wikstrom, J., Westerlund, J., & Öst, L.-G. (1999). Preattentive bias for emotional information in panic disorder with agoraphobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 222–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Maller, R., & Reiss, S. (1992). Anxiety sensitivity in 1984 and panic attacks in 1987. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 6, 241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marks, I. M., & Mathews, A. M. (1979). Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 17, 263–267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (2000). Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 602–615.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2002). Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCabe, R. E. (1999). Implicit and explicit memory for threat words in high- and low-anxiety-sensitive participants. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 23, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McNally, R. J. (1990). Psychological approaches to panic disorder: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 403–419.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. McNally, R. J. (1995). Automaticity and the anxiety disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 747–754.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McNally, R. J., & Foa, E. B. (1987). Cognition and agoraphobia: Bias in the interpretation of threat. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McNally, R. J., Hornig, C. D., Hoffman, E. C., & Han, E. M. (1999). Anxiety sensitivity and cognitive biases for threat. Behavior Therapy, 30, 51–61.Google Scholar
  35. McNally, R. J., Riemann, B. C., & Kim, E. (1990). Selective processing of threat cues in panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 407–412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. McNally, R. J., Riemann, B. C., Louro, C. E., Lukach, B. M., & Kim, E. (1992). Cognitive processing of emotional information in panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 143–149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Otto, M. W., Pollack, M. H., Penava, S. J., & Zucker, B. G. (1999). Group cognitive-behavior therapy for patients failing to respond to pharmacology for panic disorder: A clinical case series. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 763–770.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Penava, S. J., Otto, M. W., Maki, K. M., & Pollack, M. H. (1998). Rate of improvement during cognitive-behavioral group treatment for panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 665–673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Peterson, R. A., & Reiss, S. (1992). Anxiety sensitivity index manual (2nd Ed.). Worthington, OH: International Diagnostics Systems.Google Scholar
  40. Rachman, S., Lopatka, C., & Levitt, K. (1988). Experimental analyses of panic: II. Panic patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 33–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Rapee, R. M. (1996). Information-processing views of panic disorder. In R. M. Rapee (Ed.), Current controversies in the anxiety disorders (pp. 77–93). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  42. Reiss, S. (1991). Expectancy model of fear, anxiety, and panic. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reiss, S., & McNally, R. J. (1985). Expectancy model of fear. In S. Reiss & R. R. Bootzin (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 107–121). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  44. Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Richards, J. C., Austin, D. W., & Alvarenga, M. E. (2001). Interpretation of ambiguous interoceptive stimuli in panic disorder and nonclinical panic. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schmidt, N. B., Lerew, D. R., & Jackson, R. J. (1997). The role of anxiety sensitivity in the pathogenesis of panic: Prospective evaluation of spontaneous panic attacks during acute stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 355–364.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Segal, Z. V. (1988). Appraisal of the self-schema construct in cognitive models of depression. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 147–162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Shear, M. K., Brown, T. A., Barlow, D. H., Money, R., Sholomskas, D. E., Woods, S. W., et al. (1997). Multicenter collaborative Panic Disorder Severity Scale. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 1571–1575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stewart, S. H., Conrod, P. J., Gignac, M. L., & Pihl, R. O. (1998). Selective processing biases in anxiety-sensitive men and women. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 105–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242–248.Google Scholar
  52. Teachman, B. A., & Woody, S. (2003). Automatic processing among individuals with spider phobia: Change in implicit fear associations following treatment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 100–109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Telch, M. J., Shermis, M., & Lucas, J. (1989). Anxiety sensitivity: Unitary personality trait or domain-specific appraisals? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 3, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wells, A., & Papageorgiou, C. (1998). Social phobia: Effects of external attention on anxiety, negative beliefs, and perspective taking. Behavior Therapy, 29, 357–370.Google Scholar
  55. Williams, J. M. G., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd Ed.). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  57. Young, J. E. (1999). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach (3rd Ed.). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange.Google Scholar
  58. Zinbarg, R. E., Mohlman, J., & Hong, N. N. (1997). Dimensions of anxiety sensitivity. In S. Taylor (Ed.), Anxiety sensitivity: Theory, research, and treatment of the fear of anxiety (pp. 83–114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesville

Personalised recommendations