Advertisement

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 1001–1009 | Cite as

Personal Health Records and Patient-Oriented Infrastructures: Building Technology, Shaping (New) Patients, and Healthcare Practitioners

  • Enrico Maria PirasEmail author
  • Federico Cabitza
  • Myriam Lewkowicz
  • Liam Bannon
Article
  • 176 Downloads

The Personal Health Record (PHR) is an umbrella label that refers to a family of digital Information and Communication Technologies under direct patient control which has gained momentum in the last decade. The “Personally Controlled Health Record”, a phrasing used in the early days and now almost abandoned, could be considered a more accurate label as it points to the revolutionary feature of such technologies. ‘Revolutionary’ is here used in its etymological sense, in that providing patient access and control over their clinical data was a part of a more general movement of transforming a provider-centred care into a patient-centric one.

The success of the label is due to the fact that PHR has been considered a response to long-awaited solutions both in the scientific community and in the policymaking debate, especially in the USA. Policymakers have regarded PHRs as a way to create connections among the dispersed actors of a distributed, or better yet fragmented, healthcare system....

Keywords

Personal health records Healthcare Infrastructure Patient-centered care 

Notes

References

  1. Berg, Marc (1999). Accumulating and coordinating: occasions for information technologies in medical work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 373–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brennan, Patricia Flatley; Stephen Downs; and Gail Casper (2010). Project HealthDesign: rethinking the power and potential of personal health records. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. vol. 43, no. 5, pp. S3-S5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabitza, Federico; Carla Simone; and Marcello Sarini (2009). Leveraging coordinative conventions to promote collaboration awareness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 301–330. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabitza, Federico; Carla Simone; and Giorgio De Michelis (2015). User-driven prioritization of features for a prospective InterPersonal Health Record: perceptions from the Italian context. Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 59, pp. 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cimino, James J.; Vimla L. Patel; and Andre W. Kushniruk (2002). The patient clinical information system (PatCIS): Technical solutions for and experience with giving patients access to their electronic medical records. International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunbrack, Lynne A. (2011). Vendor assessment: when will PHR platforms gain consumer acceptance. Tech Report HI227550. IDC Health Insights.Google Scholar
  7. Emani, Srinivas; Cyrus K. Yamin; Ellen Peters; Andrew S. Karson; Stuart L. Lipsitz; Jonathan S. Wald; Deborah H. Williams; and David W. Bates (2012). Patient perceptions of a personal health record: a test of the diffusion of innovation model. Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 14, no. 6, p. e150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eysenbach, Gunther; John Powell; Marina Englesakis; Carlos Rizo; and Anita Stern (2004). Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ, vol. 328, no. 7449, p. 1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitzpatrick, Geraldine (2004). Integrated care and the working record. Health Informatics Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenhalgh, Trisha; Susan Hinder; Katja Stramer; Tanja Bratan; and Tanja Russell (2010). Adoption, non-adoption, and abandonment of a personal electronic health record: case study of HealthSpace. BMJ, vol. 341, no. 1, p. c5814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halamka, John D.; Kenneth D. Mandl; and Paul C. Tang (2008). Early experiences with personal health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hess, Rachel; Gary S. Fischer; Sarah M. Sullivan; XinXin Dong; Melissa Weimer; Caroline Zeith; Sunday Clark; and Mark S. Roberts (2014). Patterns of Response to Patient-Centered Decision Support Through a Personal Health Record. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 984–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoerbst, Alexander; Christian Dominik Kohl; Petra Knaup; and Elske Ammenwerth (2010). Attitudes and behaviors related to the introduction of electronic health records among Austrian and German citizens. International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Househ, Mowafa, S.; Elizabeth M. Borycki; Wesley M. Rohrer; and Andre W. Kushniruk (2014). Developing a framework for meaningful use of personal health records (PHRs). Health Policy and Technology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 272–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huba, Nicholas; and Yan Zhang (2012). Designing patient-centered personal health records (PHRs): health care professionals’ perspective on patient-generated data. Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 3893–3905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahn, James S; Veenu Aulakh; and Adam Bosworth (2009). What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record. Health affairs. vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 369-376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krist, Alex H.; and Steven H. Woolf (2011). A vision for patient-centered health information systems. Journal of American Medical Association, vol. 305, no. 3, pp. 300–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuziemsky, Craig E.; and Lara Varpio (2011). A model of awareness to enhance our understanding of interprofessional collaborative care delivery and health information system design to support it. International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. e150–e160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mandl, Kenneth D.; William W. Simons, William CR Crawford, and Jonathan M. Abbett (2007). Indivo: a personally controlled health record for health information exchange and communication. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 7, no. pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
  20. Moen, Anne; and Patricia F. Brennan (2005). Health@Home: The work of health information management in the household (HIMH): implications for consumer health informatics (CHI) innovations. Journal of American Medical informatics Association, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 648–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. NAHIT (2008) Report to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology on defining key health information technology terms. The National Alliance for Health Information Technology. Chicago. Permanently archived at http://archive.is/SnDg0. Accessed 15 March 2019.
  22. Piras, Enrico Maria; and Alberto Zanutto (2010). Prescriptions, x-rays and grocery lists. Designing a Personal Health Record to support (the invisible work of) health information management in the household. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 585–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piras, Enrico Maria; and Alberto Zanutto (2014). “One day it will be you who tells us doctors what to do!”. Exploring the “Personal” of PHR in paediatric diabetes management. Information Technology & People, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ralston, James D.; Katie Coleman; Robert J. Reid; Matthew R. Handley; and Eric B. Larson (2010). Patient Experience Should Be Part Of Meaningful-Use Criteria. Health Affairs, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 607–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ricciardi, Lygeia; Farzad Mostashari; Judy Murphy; Jodi G. Daniel; and Erin P. Siminerio (2013). A National Action Plan to Support Consumer Engagement Via E-Health. Health Affairs, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 376–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmidt, Kjeld; and Liam Bannon (1992). Taking CSCW seriously. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). An International Journal, vol. 1, nos. 1–2, pp. 7–40.Google Scholar
  27. Storni, Cristiano (2010). Multiple forms of appropriation in self-monitoring technology: Reflections on the role of evaluation in future self-care. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 537–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Swan, Melanie (2012). Crowdsourced Health Research Studies: An Important Emerging Complement to Clinical Trials in the Public Health Research Ecosystem. Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 14, no. 2, p. e46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tang, Paul C.; Joan S. Ash; David W. Bates: J. Marc Overhage; and Daniel Z. Sands (2006). Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 13. no 2, pp. 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weitzman, Elissa R.; Skyler Kelemen; Liljana Kaci; and Kenneth D. Mandl (2012). Willingness to share personal health record data for care improvement and public health: a survey of experienced personal health record users. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 12, no. 1, p. e39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zieth, Caroline R.; Lichun Rebecca Chia; Mark S. Roberts; Gary S. Fischer; Sunday Clark; Melissa Weimer; and Rachel Hess (2014). The Evolution, Use, and Effects of Personal Health Records: A Narrative Review. Electronic Journal of Health Informatics, vol. 8, no. 2, p. e17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrico Maria Piras
    • 1
    Email author
  • Federico Cabitza
    • 2
    • 3
  • Myriam Lewkowicz
    • 4
  • Liam Bannon
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Fondazione Bruno KesslerTrentoItaly
  2. 2.University of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly
  3. 3.IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico GaleazziMilanoItaly
  4. 4.Troyes University of TechnologyTroyes CedexFrance
  5. 5.University of LimerickLimerickIreland
  6. 6.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations