Advertisement

RescueGlass: Collaborative Applications involving Head-Mounted Displays for Red Cross Rescue Dog Units

  • Christian ReuterEmail author
  • Thomas Ludwig
  • Patrick Mischur
Article

Abstract

On-site work of emergency service teams consists of highly cooperative tasks. Especially during distributed search and rescue tasks there is a constant mix of routinized and non-routinized activities. Within this paper we focus on the work practices of the German Red Cross Rescue Dog Units who deal with several uncertainties regarding the involved dogs, the fragility of the respective situations as well as issues of using technologies under enormous time pressure. Smart glasses provide possibilities for enhanced and hands-free interaction in various contexts and a number of approaches have already been applied, aiming at efficient use of the respective technological innovation in private and professional contexts. However, the collaborative potential of smart glasses in time-critical and uncertain situations is still unexplored. Our design case study examines how the on-site work of emergency service teams can be supported by smart glasses: Based on examining the work practices of the German Red Cross Rescue Dogs, we introduce ‘RescueGlass’ as a coordinative concept, encompassing hands-free head-mounted display (HMD) application as well as a corresponding smartphone application. Finally, we describe the evaluation of its use in the field of emergency response and management. We show how current features such as ‘fog of war’ or various sensors support the cooperative practices of dog handlers, and outline current technical limitations offering future research questions. Our paper provides an initial design probe using smart glasses to engage in the field of collaborative professional mobile tasks.

Keywords

Head-mounted displays Smartphone Rescue dog units Emergency management Collaboration Empirical study Prototype Evaluation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jan-Oliver Huhn for his contribution to the implementation of RescueGlass as well as David Maslim for his contribution in the design of PEASI.

References

  1. Azuma, Ronald (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 355–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bristow, Huw W.; Chris Baber; James Cross; James F. Knight; and Sandra I. Woolley (2004). Defining and evaluating context for wearable computing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS), vol. 60, no. 5–6, pp. 798–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carenzo, Luca; Federico Lorenzo Barra; Pier Luigi Ingrassia; Davide Colombo; Alessandro Costa; and Francesco Della Corte (2014). Disaster medicine through Google Glass. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 222–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Convertino, Gregorio; Helena M. Mentis; Aleksandra Slavkovic; Mary Beth Rosson; and John M. Carroll (2011). Supporting common ground and awareness in emergency management planning. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 18, no. 4, Article 22, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
  5. Darby, Jason (2009). Going to War: Creating Computer War Games. Boston: Course Technology PTR.Google Scholar
  6. Datcu, Dragos; Marina Cidota; Heide Lukosch; and Stephan Lukosch (2014). On the usability of augmented reality for information exchange in teams from the security domain. In JISIC 2014. IEEE Joint Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference, The Hague, Netherlands, 24–26 September 2014. New York: IEEE, pp. 160–167.Google Scholar
  7. Dörner, Ralf; Wolfgang Broll; Paul Grimm; and Bernhard Jung (eds.) (2013). Virtual und Augmented Reality (VR / AR): Grundlagen und Methoden der Virtuellen und Augmentierten Realität. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Fuentes Fernández, María del Rocío; Carlos Iván Tinajar Bernabe; and Roberto Razo Rodríguez (2014). Red Cross Triage App Design for Augmented Reality Glasses. In MexIHC 2014. Proceedings of the V Mexican Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Oaxaca, Mexico, 3–5 November 2014. New York: ACM Press, pp. 11–14.Google Scholar
  9. Friberg, Therese; Stephan Prödel; and Rainer Koch (2011). Information Quality Criteria and their Importance for Experts in Crisis Situations. In S. R. Hiltz; M. S. Pfaff; L. Plotnick; and A. C. Robinson (eds.): ISCRAM 2012. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Lisbon, Portugal, 8–11 May 2011. Brussels: ISCRAM Association, pp. 145–154.Google Scholar
  10. Funk, Markus; Robin Boldt; Bastian Pfleging; Max Pfeiffer; Niels Henze; and Albrecht Schmidt (2014). Representing indoor location of objects on wearable computers with head-mounted displays. In T. Terada; M. Inami; K. Kunze; and T. Nojima (eds.): AH ‘14. Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference, Kobe, Japan, 7–9 March 2014. New York: ACM Press, pp. 18–21.Google Scholar
  11. Genaro Motti, Vivian; and Kelly Caine (2014). Understanding the wearability of head-mounted devices from a human-centered perspective. In L. Dunne; T. Martin; and M. Beigl (eds.): UbiComp ‘14. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Seattle, WA, 13–17 September 2014. New York: ACM Press, pp. 83–86.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2634317.2634340.
  12. Grabowski, Martha; and Karlene Roberts (2011). High Reliability Virtual Organizations: Co-Adaptive Technology and Organizational Structures in Tsunami Warning Systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 18, no. 4, Article 19, pp. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes, Gillian R. (2011). The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 18, no. 3, Article 15, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heard, Jefferson; Sidharth Thakur; Jessica Losego; and Ken Galluppi (2014). Big Board: Teleconferencing Over Maps for Shared Situational Awareness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hearn, Gregory N.; Jo A. Tacchi; Marcus Foth; and June Lennie (2008). Action Research and New Media: Concepts, Methods and Cases. New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  16. Heath, Christian; and Paul Luff (1992). Collaboration and Control: Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hertzum, Morten; and Jesper Simonsen (2015). Visual overview, oral detail: The use of an emergency-department whiteboard. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS), vol. 82, pp. 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hevner, Alan R.; and Samir Chatterjee (2010). Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hevner, Alan R.; Salvatore T. March; Jinsoo Park; and Sudha Ram (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu, Grace; Lily Chen; Johanna Okerlund; and Orit Shaer (2015). Exploring the Use of Google Glass in Wet Laboratories. In B. Begole; J. Kim; K. Inkpen; and W. Woo (eds.): CHI EA ‘15. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 18–23 April 2015. New York: ACM Press, pp. 2103–2108.Google Scholar
  21. Ishimaru, Shoya; Kai Kunze; Koichi Kise; Jens Weppner; Andreas Dengel; Paul Lukowicz; and Andreas Bulling (2014). In the blink of an eye: combining head motion and eye blink frequency for activity recognition with Google Glass. In T. Terada; M. Inami; K. Kunze; and T. Nojima (eds.): AH ‘14. Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference, Kobe, Japan, 7–9 March 2014. New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 15–18.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, Steven; Madeleine Gibson; and Bilge Mutlu (2015). Handheld or Handsfree? Remote Collaboration via Lightweight Head-Mounted Displays and Handheld Devices. In D. Cosley; A. Forte; L. Ciolfi; and D. McDonald (eds.): CSCW ‘15. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, Vancouver, Canada, 14–18 March 2015. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1825–1836.Google Scholar
  23. Kipper, Greg; and Joseph Rampolla (2012). Augmented Reality: An Emerging Technologies Guide to AR. Waltham: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  24. Klinke, Harald; and Lars Stamm (2013). Bilder der Gegenwart: Aspekte und Perspektiven des digitalen Wandels. Norderstedt: Graphentis Verlag.Google Scholar
  25. Kwon, Gyu Hyun; Tonya L. Smith-Jackson; and Charles W. Bostian (2011). Socio-cognitive aspects of interoperability: Understanding communication task environments among different organizations. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 18, no. 4, Article 20, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leue, M. C. Claudia; Timothy Jung; and Dario tom Dieck (2015). Google glass augmented reality: Generic learning outcomes for art galleries. In I. Tussyadiah and A. Inversini (eds.): Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015. Cham: Springer, pp. 463–476.Google Scholar
  27. Lewin, Kurt (1958). Group Decision and Social Change. New York: Holt; Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  28. Ley, Benedikt; Volkmar Pipek; Christian Reuter; and Torben Wiedenhoefer (2012). Supporting improvisation work in inter-organizational crisis management. In J. A. Konstan; E. H. Chi; and K. Höök (eds.): CHI ‘12. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, Texas, 5–10 May 2012. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1529–1538.Google Scholar
  29. Ley, Benedikt; Thomas Ludwig; Volkmar Pipek; Dave Randall; Christian Reuter; and Torben Wiedenhoefer (2014). Information and Expertise Sharing in Inter-Organizational Crisis Management. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 23, no. 4–6, pp. 347–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu, Sophia B. (2014). Crisis Crowdsourcing Framework: Designing Strategic Configurations of Crowdsourcing for the Emergency Management Domain. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 23, no. 4–6, pp. 389–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ludwig, Thomas; Christian Reuter; and Volkmar Pipek (2013). What You See Is What I Need: Mobile Reporting Practices in Emergencies. In O. W. Bertelsen; L. Ciolfi; A. Grasso; and G. A. Papadopoulos (eds.): ECSCW 2013. Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Paphos, Cyprus, 21–25 September 2013. London: Springer, pp. 181–206.Google Scholar
  32. Ludwig, Thomas; Christian Reuter; and Volkmar Pipek (2015). Social Haystack: Dynamic Quality Assessment of Citizen-Generated Content during Emergencies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 21, no. 4, Article 17, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  33. Lukosch, Stephan; Mark Billinghurst; Leila Alem; and Kiyoshi Kiyokawa (2015a). Collaboration in Augmented Reality. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 515–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lukosch, Stephan; Heide Lukosch; Dragoş Datcu; and Marina Cidota (2015b). Providing Information on the Spot: Using Augmented Reality for Situational Awareness in the Security Domain. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 613–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mann, Steve (2012a). “GlassEyes”: The Theory of EyeTap Digital Eye Glass. Supplemental material for “Through the Glass, Lightly.” IEEE Technology and Society, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 10–14.Google Scholar
  36. Mann, Steve (2012b). Through the Glass, Lightly [Viewpoint]. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mann, Steve (2014). Wearable Computing. In M. Soegaard and R. F. Dam (eds.): The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd ed. Aarhus: The Interaction Design Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. McNaney, Rísin; John Vines; Daniel Roggen; Madeline Balaam; Pengfei Zhang; Ivan Poliakov; and Patrick Olivier (2014). Exploring the acceptability of google glass as an everyday assistive device for people with parkinson’s. In CHI ‘14. Proceedings of the 2014 annual ACM conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Canada, 26 April - 1 May 2014. New York: ACM Press, pp. 2551–2554.Google Scholar
  39. Mendonça, David (2007). Decision Support for Improvisation in Response to Extreme Events: Learning from the Response to the 2001 World Trade Center Attack. Decision Support Systems, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 952–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mentler, Tilo; Janosch Kappel; Lutz Wünsch; and Michael Herczeg (2016). Photo-enriched Documentation during Surgeries with Google Glass: An Exploration Usability Study in a Department of Paediatric Surgery. I-Com Journal of Interactive Media, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 171–178.Google Scholar
  41. Muensterer, O. J. Oliver J.; Martin Lacher; Christoph Zoeller; Matthew Bronstein; and Joachim Kübler (2014). Google Glass in pediatric surgery: an exploratory study. International Journal of Surgery, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nilsson, Susanna; Björn J. E. Johansson; and Arne Jönsson (2011). Cross-organizational collaboration supported by Augmented Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1380–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parslow, Graham R. (2014). Commentary: Google glass: A head-up display to facilitate teaching and learning. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 91–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paton, Douglas (2003). Stress in disaster response: a risk management approach. Disaster Prevention and Management, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pipek, Volkmar; Sophia B. Liu; and Andruid Kerne (2014). Crisis Informatics and Collaboration: A Brief Introduction. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 23, no. 4–6, pp. 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Poelman, Ronald; Oytun Akman; Stephan Lukosch; and Pieter Jonker (2012). As if Being There: Mediated Reality for Crime Scene Investigation. In CSCW ‘12. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, Washington, 11–15 February 2012. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1267–1276.Google Scholar
  47. Ramirez, Leonardo; Tobias Dyrks; Jan Gerwinski; Matthias Betz; Markus Scholz; and Volker Wulf (2012). Landmarke: an ad hoc deployable ubicomp infrastructure to support indoor navigation of firefighters. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (PUC), vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1025–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Randall, David; Richard Harper; and Mark Rouncefield (2007). Fieldwork for Design: Theory and Practice. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reuter, Christian; Thomas Ludwig; and Volkmar Pipek (2014). Ad Hoc Participation in Situation Assessment: Supporting Mobile Collaboration in Emergencies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 21, no. 5, Article 26, pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reuter, Christian; Thomas Ludwig; Therese Friberg; Sylvia Pratzler-Wanczura; and Alexis Gizikis (2015a). Social Media and Emergency Services? Interview Study on Current and Potential Use in 7 European Countries. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (IJISCRAM), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reuter, Christian; Thomas Ludwig; Timo Funke; and Volkmar Pipek (2015b). SOMAP: Network Independent Social-Offline-Map-Mashup. In L. Palen; M. Büscher; T. Comes; and A. L. Hughes (eds.): ISCRAM 2015. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Kristiansand, Norway, 24–27 May 2015. Brussels: ISCRAM Association, pp. 100–109.Google Scholar
  52. Rolland, Jannick P.; Frank Biocca; Felix Hamza-Lup; Yanggang Ha; and Ricardo Martins (2005). Development of Head-Mounted Projection Displays for Distributed, Collaborative, Augmented Reality Applications. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 528–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sánchez, Jesús M.; Álvaro Carrera; Carlos Á. Iglesias; and Emilio Serrano (2016). A Participatory Agent-Based Simulation for Indoor Evacuation Supported by Google Glass. IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1360–1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schafer, Wendy; Craig H. Ganoe; and John M. Carroll (2007). Supporting Community Emergency Management Planning through a Geocollaboration Software Architecture. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 16, no. 4–5, pp. 501–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schnier, Christian; Karola Pitsch; Angelika Dierker; and Thomas Hermann (2011). Collaboration in Augmented Reality: How to establish coordination and joint attention? In S. Bødker; N. O. Bouvin; V. Wulf; L. Ciolfi; and W. Lutters (eds.): ECSCW 2011. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Aarhus, Denmark, 24–28 September 2011. London: Springer, pp. 405–416.Google Scholar
  56. Semaan, Bryan; and Gloria Mark (2011). Technology-mediated social arrangements to resolve breakdowns in infrastructure during ongoing disruption. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 18, no. 4, Article 21, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Starner, Thad (2013). Project Glass: An Extension of the Self. IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 14–16.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2013.35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Strauss, Anselm L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tönnis, Marcus (2010). Augmented Reality. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turoff, Murray; Starr Roxanne Hiltz; Connie White; Linda Plotnick; Art Hendela; and Xiang Yao (2009). The past as the future of emergency preparedness and management. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (IJISCRAM), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tursi, Gianluca; Martina Deplano; and Giancarlo Ruffo (2014). AIRCacher: Virtual Geocaching Powered with Augmented Reality. In HT ‘14. Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and social media, Santiago, Chile, 1–4 September 2014. New York: ACM Press, pp. 330–332.Google Scholar
  62. Twidale, Michael; David Randall; and Richard Bentley (1994). Situated evaluation for cooperative systems. In CSCW ‘94. Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Chapel Hill, NC, 22–26 October 1994. New York: ACM Press, pp. 441–452.Google Scholar
  63. van Krevelen, Rick; and Ronald Poelman (2010). A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, Applications and Limitations. The International Journal of Virtual Reality, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
  64. Weiser, Mark (1999). The computer for the 21st century. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson, J.; and Patricia Wright (2009). Head-mounted display efficacy study to aid first responder indoor navigation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, vol. 223, no. 3, pp. 675–688.Google Scholar
  66. Wu, Leslie; Jesse Cirimele; Jonathan Bassen; Kristen Leach; Stuart Card; Larry Chu; … Scott Klemmer (2013). Head-mounted and multi-surface displays support emergency medical teams. In A. Bruckman; S. Counts; C. Lampe; and L. Terveen (eds.): CSCW ‘13. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, San Antonio, Texas, 23–27 February 2013. New York: ACM Press, pp. 279–282.Google Scholar
  67. Wulf, Volker; Markus Rohde; Volkmar Pipek; and Gunnar Stevens (2011). Engaging with practices: design case studies as a research framework in CSCW. In S. Fussell; W. Lutters; M. R. Morris; and M. Reddy (eds.): CSCW’ 11. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Hangzhou, China, 19–23 March 2011. New York: ACM Press, pp. 505–512.Google Scholar
  68. Zimmerman, John; Jodi Forlizzi; and Shelley Evenson (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In M. B. Rosson and D. Gilmore (eds.): CHI ‘07. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, San Jose, Calif., 30 April - 3 May 2007. New York: ACM Press, pp. 493–502.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science and Technology for Peace and Security (PEASEC)Technische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany
  2. 2.Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS)University of SiegenSiegenGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Information SystemsUniversity of SiegenSiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations