Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 525–554 | Cite as

Collaboration in Translation: The Impact of Increased Reach on Cross-organisational Work

  • Gavin Doherty
  • Nikiforos Karamanis
  • Saturnino Luz


Coping with the increased levels of geographic and temporal distribution of work and the near ubiquitous accessibility of information fostered by today’s networking technologies has been recognised as one of the greatest challenges facing CSCW research. This trend is reflected in the development of workflow-based tools which cross organisational boundaries, putting pressure on established coordination mechanisms aimed at articulating the work of teams that include co-located and remote members. In this paper, we explore these issues by analysing a localisation activity carried out across organisational boundaries where the pressures for increased distribution and accessibility of information manifest themselves quite clearly both in the way work is specified and locally articulated. We look at how the work is realised in practice, and present an analysis based on the coordination mechanisms, awareness mechanisms and communication flows which occur both inside and outside of the formal workflow-support tools. The analysis reveals a wide variety of informal communication, ad-hoc coordination mechanisms and bricolage activities that are used for local articulation and metawork. As well as providing a concrete illustration of the issues caused by increased distribution, beyond those inherent in the complexity of the work, the analysis reveals a number of opportunities for better supporting the work and for the successful integration of new technologies.


Reach Coordination Awareness Fieldwork study Translation Organisational boundaries Localisation teamwork Workflow 



This research is supported by the Science Foundation Ireland (Grant 07/CE/I1142) as part of the Centre for Next Generation Localisation ( We are very grateful to Fred Hollowood and Fernando Blasi for their help in arranging this study and to the participants for taking part.


  1. Ågerfalk, P. J., B. Fitzgerald, H. Holmström, B. Lings, B. Lundell, and E. O. Conchúir: 2005, A framework for considering opportunities and threats in distributed software development. In: In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Distributed Software Development (Paris, Aug. 29, 2005). Austrian Computer Society. pp. 47–61.Google Scholar
  2. Bayerl, P. and K. Lauche: 2010, Technology Effects in Distributed Team Coordination – High-Interdependency Tasks in Offshore Oil Production. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 139–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bittner, E.: 1966, The concept of organization. Social Research, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 239–255. Reprinted in R. Turner (Ed.) (1974). Ethnomethodology (pp. 69-81). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Bowers., J., G. Button, and W. Sharrock: 1995, Workflow From Within and Without: Technology and Cooperative Work on the Print Industry Shopfloor. In: ECSCW’95: Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 51–66.Google Scholar
  5. Büscher, M., S. Gill, P. Mogensen, and D. Shapiro: 2001, Landscapes of Practice: Bricolage as a Method for Situated Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dourish, P. and V. Bellotti: 1992, Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: CSCW’92: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. New York: ACM Press, pp. 107–114.Google Scholar
  7. Esselink, B.: 2003, Localisation and translation. In: H. Somers (ed.): Computers and Translation: A translator’s guide. Hemdon, Virginia: John Benjamins, Chapt. 5, pp. 67–86.Google Scholar
  8. Galegher, J. and R. E. Kraut: 1994, Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: an experience in group writing. Information Systems Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 110–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerson, E. M.: 2008, Reach, Bracket, and the Limits of Rationalized Coordination: Some Challenges for CSCW. In: M. S. Ackerman, C. A. Halverson, T. Erickson, and W. A. Kellogg (eds.): Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts. London: Springer, pp. 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gutwin, C., R. Penner, and K. Schneider: 2004, Group Awareness in Distributed Software Development. In: In CSCW’04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. pp. 72–81, ACM Press.Google Scholar
  11. Harper, R. R., J. A. Hughes, and D. Z. Shapiro: 1991, Harmonious working and CSCW: computer technology and air traffic control. In: Studies in computer supported cooperative work: theory, practice and design. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., pp. 225–234.Google Scholar
  12. Hartswood, M., R. Procter, R. Slack, A. Voß, M. Büscher, M. Rouncefield, and P. Rouchy: 2008, Co-Realization: Toward a Principled Synthesis of Ethnomethodology and Participatory Design. In: M. S. Ackerman, C. A. Halverson, T. Erickson, and W. A. Kellogg (eds.): Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts. London: Springer, pp. 59–94.Google Scholar
  13. Heath, C. and P. Luff: 1992, Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karamanis, N., S. Luz, and G. Doherty: 2011, Translation practice in the workplace: contextual analysis and implications for machine translation. Machine Translation, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 35-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewis, D., S. Curran, K. Feeney, Z. Etzioni, J. Keeney, A. Way, and R. Schäler: 2009, Web service integration for next generation localisation. In: SETQA-NLP’09: Proceedings of the Workshop on Software Engineering, Testing, and Quality Assurance for Natural Language Processing. Morristown, New Jersey: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 47–55.Google Scholar
  16. Malone, T. and K. Crowston: 1994, The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 87–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Orlikowski, W.: 2002, Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, vol. 13, no 3, pp. 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Randall, D., R. Harper, and M. Rouncefield: 2007, Fieldwork for design: theory and practice. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmidt, K.: 2002, The Problem with Awareness: Introductory Remarks on Awareness in CSCW. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmidt, K. and C. Simone: 1996, Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 155–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schmidt, K. and I. Wagner: 2004, Ordering Systems: Coordinative Practices and Artifacts in Architectural Design and Planning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 13, nos. 5-6, pp. 349–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Somers, H.: 2003, Translation Memory systems. In: H. Somers (ed.): Computers and Translation: A translator’s guide. John Benjamins, Chapt. 3, pp. 31–48.Google Scholar
  23. Star, S. L. and J. R. Griesemer: 1989, Institutional Ecology,Translations and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39’. Social Studies of Science, vol. 19, no 3, pp. 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Strauss, A.: 1988, The Articulation of Project Work: An Organizational Process. The Sociological Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Suchman, L. A.: 1987, Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Suchman, L., R. Trigg, and J. Blomberg: 2002, Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype. British Journal of Sociology, vol. 53, no. 2, 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilson, J., S. Straus, and B. McEvily: 2006, All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wittner, J. and D. Goldschmidt: 2007, Technical Challenges and Localisation Tools. In: Localisation Guide 2007. Multilingual Computing Inc, pp. 10–14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gavin Doherty
    • 1
  • Nikiforos Karamanis
    • 1
  • Saturnino Luz
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer Science and StatisticsTrinity College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations