Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 22, Issue 4–6, pp 575–607 | Cite as

From Artefacts to Infrastructures

  • Eric MonteiroEmail author
  • Neil Pollock
  • Ole Hanseth
  • Robin Williams


In their initial articulation of the direction of the CSCW field, scholars advanced an open-ended agenda. This continuing commitment to open-ness to different contexts and approaches is not, however, reflected in the contents of the major CSCW outlets. The field appears to privilege particular forms of cooperative work. We find many examples of what could be described as ‘localist studies’, restricted to particular settings and timeframes. This focus on the ‘here and now’ is particularly problematic when one considers the kinds of large-scale, integrated and interconnected workplace information technologies—or what we are calling Information Infrastructures—increasingly found within and across organisations today. CSCW appears unable (or unwilling) to grapple with these technologies—which were at the outset envisaged as falling within the scope of the field. Our paper hopes to facilitate greater CSCW attention to Information Infrastructures through offering a re-conceptualisation of the role and nature of ‘design’. Design within an Information Infrastructures perspective needs to accommodate non-local constraints. We discuss two such forms of constraint: standardisation (how local fitting entails unfitting at other sites) and embeddedness (the entanglement of one technology with other apparently unrelated ones). We illustrate these themes through introducing case material drawn on from a number of previous studies.

Key words

Infrastructures Ethnography Localist CSCW 


  1. Aanestad, M. (2003). The Camera as an Actor Design-in-Use of Telemedicine Infrastructure in Surgery, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, M. S. (2000). The intellectual challenge of CSCW: the gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 15, no. 2–3, pp. 179–203.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. J. (2000). Where the rubber hits the road: notes on the deployment problem in workplace studies. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, & C. Heath (Eds.), Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berg, Marc (1999). Accumulating and Coordinating: Occasions for Information Technologies in Medical Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 8, pp. 373–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braudel, F. (1949). Méditerranée et le monde mediterranéen a l’époque de Philippe II Vol.1 In English translation (tr. Sian Reynolds 1972) as The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, vol. I. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  6. Dourish, P. (2006). Implications for Design. In R. Grinter, T. Rodden, P. Aoki, E. Cutrell, R. Jeffries, & G. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada, April 22–27, 2006). CHI’06. ACM, New York, NY, pp. 541–550.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Bowker, G. C., & Knobel, C. P. (2007). Understanding infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions, and design. Ann Arbor: Deep Blue.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, P., Jackson, J.S., Bowker, G. and Williams, R. (2009) Introduction: an agenda for infrastructure studies, Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS),, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 364–374Google Scholar
  9. Ellingsen, G and Monteiro, E. (2003). A Patchwork Planet: Integration and Cooperation in Hospitals, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellingsen, G. and Monteiro, E. (2006). Seamless Integration: Standardisation Across Multiple Settings, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 15, no. 5–6, pp. 443–466.Google Scholar
  11. Ellingsen, E. , Monteiro, E. and Munkvold, G. (2007). Standardised work: co-constructive practice, The Information Society, vol. 23, no. 5, 2007, pp. 309–326.Google Scholar
  12. Fitzpatrick, G. (2003). (ed.) The Locales Framework: Understanding and Designing for Wicked Problems, The Kluwer international series on CSCW.Google Scholar
  13. Fleck, J., Webster, J., & Williams, R. (1990). The dynamics of I.T. implementation: a reassessment of paradigms and trajectories of development. Futures, vol. 22, pp. 618–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gawer, A. (ed.) (2009) Platforms, Markets and Innovation. Edward Elgar:Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
  15. Greif, I. (1988). (ed.) Computer-supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M (eds.) (1991). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Gutwin, C. and Greenberg, S. (2002). A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal, vol. 11, no. 3–4, pp 411–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanseth, O. (2001). Gateways – Just as important as standards. How the internet won the ‘religious war’ about standards in Scandinavia, Knowledge, Technology and Policy vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanseth, O., Aanestad, M.,(2003). Design as bootstrapping. On the evolution of ICT network in healthcare. Methods of Information in Medicine vol. 42, pp. 385–391.Google Scholar
  20. Hanseth, O. and Braa, K. (2001). Hunting for the treasure at the end of the rainbow: standardizing corporate IT infrastructure, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 10, no. 3–4, pp. 261–292.Google Scholar
  21. Hanseth, O. and Ljungberg, N. (2001). Designing Work Oriented Infrastructures, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 18, pp. 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanseth, O., and Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, vol. 25, no. 1, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., and Hatling, M. (1996). Developing information infrastructure: The tension between standardization and flexibility. Science, Technology and Human Values, vol. 21, no. 4, 407–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanseth, O., Jacucci, E., Grisot, M., and Aanestad, M. (2006). Reflexive Standardization: Side Effects and Complexity in Standard Making. MIS Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 563–581.Google Scholar
  25. Harris, S. (1998) ‘Long-Distance Corporations, Big Sciences, and the Geography of Knowledge’, Configurations, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 269–304.Google Scholar
  26. Hartswood, M., R. Procter, M. Rouncefield and R. Slack (2003). Making a Case in Medical Work: Implications for the Electronic Medical Record. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 12 no. 3, pp. 241–266.Google Scholar
  27. Hepsø, V., Monteiro, E and Rolland, K., (2009) Ecologies of eInfrastructures, Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 430–446.Google Scholar
  28. Hughes, J., Randall, D., and Shapiro, D. (1992). Faltering from ethnography to design. In Proceedings of CSCW ’92, pp. 115–122.Google Scholar
  29. Jirotka, M, Gilber, N and Luff, P. (1992) On the Social Organisation of Organisations, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 1, pp. 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johannessen, L. and Ellingsen, G. (2009). Integration and Generification—Agile Software Development in the Healthcare Market, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 18, no. 5–6, pp. 607–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kallinikos, J. (2004). Deconstructing information packages: organizational and behavioural implications of ERP systems, Information Technology & People, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 8–30.Google Scholar
  32. Karasti, H. (2001). Bridging Work Practice and System Design: Integrating Systemic Analysis, Appreciative Intervention and Practitioner Participation, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 10, pp. 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karasti, H., Baker, K.S. and Halkola, E. (2006). Enriching the Notion of Data Curation in e-Science: Data Managing and Information Infrastructuring in the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 15, pp. 321–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Karasti, H., Baker, S.B. and Millerand, F. (2010). Infrastructure time: long-term matters in collaborative development, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 19, pp. 377–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leonardi, P. M., S. Barley. 2008. Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 159–176. 18(3) 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., Heath, C., & Hinds, P. J. (Eds.). (2000). Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 24, pp. 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martin, D., Hartswood, M., Slack, M., & Voss, A. (2006). Achieving dependability in the configuration, integration and testing of healthcare technologies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 15, numbers 5–6, pp. 467–499.Google Scholar
  40. Mozaffar, H. (2011) Innovation within Packaged Software User Groups, European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) 2011 doctoral consortium, June 2011.Google Scholar
  41. Plowman, L., Rogers, Y., and Ramage, M. (1995). What are workplace studies for? In Proceedings of ECSCW’95, ed. H. Marmolin,Y. Sundblad, and K. Schmidt, pp. 309–324. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  42. Pollock, N. and Williams, R. (2010). e-Infrastructures: how do we know and understand them? Strategic ethnography and the biography of artefacts, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 19. pp. 521–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pollock, N. and Williams, R. (2011) Who Decides the Shape of Product Markets? The Knowledge Institutions that Name and Categorise New Technologies, Information and Organization, vol. 21, pp. 194–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pollock, N., Williams, R., & D’Adderio, L. (2007). Global software and its provenance: generification work in the production of organizational software packages. Social Studies of Science, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 254–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Randell, D. and Shapiro, D. (1992). Ethnographically-informed systems design for air traffic control, Proc. CSCW '92 Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work.Google Scholar
  46. Ribes, D., & Finholt, T. A. (2009). The long now of technology infrastructure: articulating tensions in development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), Special Issue on e-Infrastructure, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 375–398.
  47. Ribes, D. and Lee. C. (2010). Sociotechnical Studies of Cyberinfrastructure and e-Research: Current Themes and Future Trajectories, CSCW, vol. 19, no. 3–4, pp. 231–244.Google Scholar
  48. Rooksby, J., Rouncefield, M. and Sommerville, I. (2009). Testing in the wild: the social and organisational dimensions of real world work, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 18, pp. 559–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schmidt, K. (2000). The critical role of workplace studies in CSCW, Chap. 6. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, C. Heath, & P. J. Hinds (Eds.), Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design (pp. 141–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Schimdt, K. and Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW seriously. Supporting articulation work, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 1, pp. 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scott, S.V. and Wagner, E.L. (2003) ‘Networks, Negotiations, and New Times: The Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning into an Academic Administration’, Information and Organization, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 285–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shapiro, C. and Varian, H.R. (1999). Information Rules: A strategic guide to the network economy, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  53. Stewart, J. and Williams, R. (2005) ‘The wrong trousers? : beyond the design fallacy: social learning and the user’, in Debra Howcroft and Eileen M. Trauth (eds.) Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory And Application, Edward, Elgar Pub., Cheltenham Chapter 10, pp. 195–223.Google Scholar
  54. Suchman, Lucy (1987). Plans and situated action, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. press.Google Scholar
  55. Swanson E B, Ramiller N C. (1997).The organizing vision in information systems innovation. Organization Science, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 458–474 Google Scholar
  56. Taylor, J. R., & Virgili, S. (2008). Why ERPs disappoint: The importance of getting the organisational text right, chap 5. In B. Grabot, A. Mayère, & I. Baze (Eds.), ERP systems and organisational change: A socio-technical insight (pp. 59–84). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Timmermans, S., and Berg, M. (1997). Standardization in action: Achieving universalism and localisation through medical protocols. Social Studies of Science, vol. 27, pp. 111–134.Google Scholar
  58. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B, and Bush, A. A.. Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics. Information Systems Research. Vol. 21, no. 4, December 2010, pp. 675–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vaast, E. and Walsham, G. (2009). Trans-situated learning: supporting a network of practice with an information infrastructure. Information Systems Research, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 547–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Voss A, Procter R, Slack R, Hartswood M, Rouncefield M (2009) Design as and for Collaboration: Making Sense of and Supporting Practical Action in: Voss A, Hartswood M, Procter R, Slack R, Rouncefield M, Büscher M, editor(s). Configuring user-designer relations: Interdisciplinary perspectives. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  61. Wagner, E. and Newell, S. (2004) ‘Best for Whom? The Tension between “Best Practice” ERP Packages and Diverse Epistemic Cultures in a University Context’, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 13, pp. 305–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Williams, R. & Pollock, N. (2012) Moving Beyond the Single Site Implementations Study: Why (and How) We Should Study the Biography of Software Packages, Information Systems Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams, R., Stewart, J. and Slack, R. (2005) Social Learning in Technological Innovation: Experimenting with Information and Communication Technologies, Edward Elgar: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  64. Winthereik, B. and Vikkelsø, S. (2005). ICT and Integrated Care: Some Dilemmas of Standardising Inter-Organisational Communication, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 14, pp. 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zittrain, J. L. (2006). The generative Internet, Harvard Law Review, vol. 119, no. 7, pp. 1974–2040.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Monteiro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Neil Pollock
    • 1
  • Ole Hanseth
    • 1
  • Robin Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Information SciencesNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations