Advertisement

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 20, Issue 4–5, pp 265–304 | Cite as

Analyzing Political Activists’ Organization Practices: Findings from a Long Term Case Study of the European Social Forum

  • Saqib Saeed
  • Markus Rohde
  • Volker Wulf
Article

Abstract

Designing ICT support for transnational networks of social activists is a challenge due to diverse organizational structures, cultural identities, political ideologies, and financial conditions. In this paper we present empirical findings on ICT usage in the organizing process of the European Social Forum (ESF) covering a period of almost 3 years. The European Social Forum is a platform for political activists involved in the anti-globalization movement. During our data collection period, the 5th and 6th European Social Fora were held in Malmo (2008) and Istanbul (2010). The paper describes complex social practices in organizing ESF events. We use the term fragmented meta-coordination to denote this type of practice. Mundane IT applications, such as a mailing list and a content management system, play a central role in enabling different aspects of fragmented meta-coordination. The findings also indicate how lacking resources, organizational distribution, and technical limitations hamper the preparation process and reduce the transparency of political decision making. Our analysis highlights central organizational and technological challenges related to ICT appropriation in transnational networks of social activists.

Key words

ethnographic case study technology and the third sector community informatics social movements and ICTs political organizing meta-coordination 

References

  1. Davis, G. F., & Zald, M. N. (2005). Social change, social theory, and the convergence of movements and organizations. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organizational theory Cambridge (pp. 335–350). UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ESF (2008). European Social Forum www.esf2008.org [Accessed 30/06/ 2011].
  3. ESF (2010). European Social Forum www.esf2010.org [Accessed 13/05/ 2010].
  4. Farooq, U., Merkel, C., B., Nash, H., Rosson, M., B., Carroll, J., M., & Xiao, L. (2005). Participatory Design as Apprenticeship: Sustainable Watershed Management as a Community Computing Application. In 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 178c.Google Scholar
  5. Farooq, U. (2005). Conceptual and Technical Scaffolds for End User Development: Using scenarios and wikis in community computing. In IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing Los Alamitos, California. 329–330.Google Scholar
  6. Farooq, U., Merkel, C. B., Xiao, L., Nash, H., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2006). Participatory design as a learning process: enhancing community-based watershed management through technology. In S. P. Depoe (Ed.), The environmental communication yearbook, volume 3 (pp. 243–267).Google Scholar
  7. FSE (2008): http://www.fse-esf.org/ [accessed 13/10/ 2008]
  8. Goecks, J., Voida, A., Voida, S., & Mynatt, E. D. (2008). Charitable technologies: opportunities for collaborative computing in nonprofit fundraising. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, New York, pp. 689–698.Google Scholar
  9. Huysman, M., & Wulf, V. (2006). IT to support knowledge sharing in communities: towards a social capital analysis. Journal on Information Technology (JIT), 21(1), 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Iverson, J., & Burkart, P. (2007). Managing electronic document workflows: Enterprise content management at work in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(4), 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kavada, A. (2005). Civil society organizations and the internet: the case of amnesty international, oxfam and the world development movement. In Jong et al. (Eds.), Global activism, global media London: Pluto Press (pp. 208–222). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kavada, A. (2009a). E-mail lists and the construction of an open and multifaceted identity: the case of the London 2004 European Social Forum. Information, Communication & Society, 12(6), 817–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kavada, A. (2009b). The Internet and decentralized architectures: email lists and the organizing process of the European Social Forum. In A. Karatzogianni (Ed.), Cyber conflict and global politics (pp. 188–204). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Kitschelt, H. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lieberman, H.; Paternó, F. & Wulf, V. (2006). End User Development, Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Mclver, W. (2004). Tools for collaboration between tans national NGOs: multilingual, Legislative Drafting available at In Proceedings of International Colloquium on Communication and Democracy: Technology and Citizen Engagement. Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?action=rtdoc&an=8913621 [Accessed 30/06/ 2011]
  17. Mclver, W. (2004a). Software Support for Multi-Lingual Legislative Drafting, In Proceedings of the Community Informatics Research Network Conference and Colloquium Tuscany, Italy http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?action=rtdoc&an=8913770&article=13&fd=pdf [Accessed 30/06/ 2011]
  18. McPhail, B., Costantino, T., Bruckmann, D., Barclay, R., & Clement, A. (1998). CAVEAT exemplar: participatory design in a non-profit volunteer organisation. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7(3), 223–241.Google Scholar
  19. Merkel, C., Farooq, U., Xiao, L., Ganoe, C., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2007) Managing technology use and learning in nonprofit community organizations: methodological challenges and opportunities. In Symposium on Computer Human interaction for the Management of information Technology, Article 8, ACM, New York.Google Scholar
  20. O’Donnell, S. (2001). Analysing the internet and the public sphere: the case of womenslink. Javnost, 8(1), 39–58.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Pilemalm, S. (2002). Information Technology for Non-Profit Organizations Extended Participatory Design of an Information System for Trade Union Shop Stewards. PhD Thesis, Linköping University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  22. Pini, B., Brown, K., & Previte, J. (2004). Politics and identity in cyberspace a case study of australian women in agriculture online. In Donk et al. (Eds.), Cyber protest, new media, citizens and social movements (pp. 259–275). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (1999). A groupware’s life, in sixth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW ’99) (pp. 199–219). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  24. Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2009). Infrastructuring: towards an integrated perspective on the design and use of information technology. Journal of the Association of Information System (JAIS), 10(5), 306–332.Google Scholar
  25. Rohde, M. (2004). Find what binds. Building Social Capital in an Iranian NGO Community System. In M. Huysman & V. Wulf (Eds.), Social capital and information technology (pp. 75–112). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Saeed, S. & Rohde, M. (2010) Computer Enabled Social Movements? Usage of a collaborative web platform within the European Social Forum In 9th International conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, Springer pp. 245–264.Google Scholar
  27. Saeed, S., Rohde, M., & Wulf, V. (2009). Technologies within transnational social activist communities: an ethnographic study of the European Social Forum. In Fourth international Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T '09) ACM, New York, pp. 85–94.Google Scholar
  28. Saeed, S., Pipek, V., Rohde, M., & Wulf, V. (2010). Managing nomadic knowledge: a case study of the European Social Forum. In 28th international Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, pp. 537–546.Google Scholar
  29. Saeed, S., Rohde, M., & Wulf, V. (2011). Communicating in a Transnational Network of Social Activists: The Crucial Importance of Mailing List Usage. In 17th CRIWG Conference on Collaboration and Technology, Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Schmidt, K. (2011). Cooperative Work and Coordinative Practices: Contributions to the Conceptual Foundations of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Springer LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmidt, K., & Simone, C. (1996). Coordination mechanisms: towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW system design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 5(2/3), 155–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sen, P.; Spyridakis,I.; Amtmann, S.& Lee, C.P. (2010) Using social media for social activism. In 16th ACM international conference on supporting group work (GROUP '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 331–332.Google Scholar
  33. Stevens, G.; Quaisser, G. & Klann, M. (2006). Breaking It Up: An Industrial Case Study of Component-Based Tailorable Software Design, in: Lieberman, H.; Paternó, F. and Wulf, V., End User Development, Springer, 2006, pp. 269–294Google Scholar
  34. Stoll, J., Edwards, W. K., & Mynatt, E. D. (2010). Inter organizational coordination and awareness in a nonprofit ecosystem. In 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '10), ACM, New York, NY, pp. 51–60.Google Scholar
  35. Stoll, J., Edwards, W. K., & Mynatt, E. D. (2010a). Informal interactions in nonprofit networks. In 28th international Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, pp. 533–536.Google Scholar
  36. Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Surman, M. & Reilly, K. (2003). Appropriating the internet for social change: towards the strategic use of networked technologies by transnational civil society organizations.http://programs.ssrc.org/itic/publications/knowledge_report/final_entire_surman_reilly.pdf [accessed 04/09/2008].
  38. Tarrow, S.G. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements, collective action and politics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Torres-Coronas, T., Vidal-Blasco, M., & Monclus-Guitart, R. (2010). Moving forward?: the use of ICT and web 2.0 tools in the Catalan third social sector. SIGCAS Computers and Society, 40(3), 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Voida, A., Harmon, M.E. & Al-Ani, B. (2011). Homebrew databases: Complexities of everyday information management in nonprofit organizations. In 2011 Conference on human factors in Computing System (CHI 2011) ACM Press, New York, pp. 915–924.Google Scholar
  41. WSF, (2008). World Social Forum Charter of Principles. from http://www.forumsocialmundial.org.br/main.php?id_menu=4&cd_language=2 [Accessed 30/06/ 2011]
  42. Wulf, V., Pipek, V., & Won, V. (2008). Component-based tailorability: towards highly flexible software applications. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS), 66(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wulf, V. & Rohde, M. (1995). Towards an integrated organization and technology development. In 1st conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, & techniques (DIS '95), ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 55–64.Google Scholar
  44. Wulf, V.; Rohde, M.; Pipek, V. & Stevens, G. (2011): Engaging with practices: design case studies as a research framework in CSCW In 2011 International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work ACM Press, New York, pp. 505–512.Google Scholar
  45. Yamashita , N., & Ishida, T. (2006). Effects of Machine Translation on Collaborative Work. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW-06), ACM Press, New York, pp. 515–523.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SiegenSiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations