Bridging Artifacts and Actors: Expertise Sharing in Organizational Ecosystems

Article

Abstract

We synthesize findings from longitudinal case studies examining work practices in three different organizations and propose analytical and methodological frameworks to guide the design and implementation of technologies for expertise and knowledge management. We appropriate the concept of ecosystem to argue that we can create active and useful solutions for knowledge management through a focus on interaction between two mutually intertwined elements of an ecosystem—artifacts and actors. We show that in expertise and knowledge sharing systems domain knowledge and technological knowledge are complementary and we present evidence that small solutions can have far reaching effects. Finally, we make a case for full integration of IT developers as an element of expertise sharing ecosystem.

Key words

knowledge management expertise sharing case studies IT ecosystems CSCW 

References

  1. Ackerman, M. S. (1998). Augmenting organizational memory: a field study of answer garden. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 16(3), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, M. S., & Halverson, C. (1998). Considering an organization’s memory. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW ‘98) (pp. 39–48). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/289444.289461
  3. Ackerman, M. S., & McDonald, D. W. (1996). Answer garden 2: Merging organizational memory with collaborative help. In International Conference on CSCW’96 (p. 97–105), New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  4. Ackerman, M. S., Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (Eds.). (2003). Expertise sharing: Beyond knowledge management. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  5. Adamic, L. A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., & Ackerman, M. S. (2008). Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something. In Proceedings of WWW (pp. 665–674).Google Scholar
  6. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2002). Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25, 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bannon, L., & Kuutti, K. (1996). Shifting perspectives on organizational memory: From storage to active remembering, in 29th Hawaii Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-29. 1996. Maui, Hawaii, 3–6 January 1996.: IEEE Computer Press, Los Alamitos, pp. 156–167Google Scholar
  8. Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring—evidence from observations of CT Scanners and the Social-Order of Radiology Departments. Administrative Science Quarterly (31:1), March, pp 78–108.Google Scholar
  9. Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (2001). Bringing Work Back In. Organization Science, 12, 76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becks, A., Reichling, T., & Wulf, V. (2004). Expert finding: Approaches to foster social capital. In M. Huysman & V. Wulf (Eds.), Social Capital and Information Technology (pp. 333–354). Cambridge. MA.Google Scholar
  11. Bobrow, D. G., & Whalen, J. (2002). The Eureka Story: community knowledge sharing in practice. Reflections, 4(2).Google Scholar
  12. Cabitza, F., & Simone, C. (2009). Active artifacts as bridges between context and community knowledge sources. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies (C&T 2009) (pp. 115–124). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  13. Civan-Hartzler, A., McDonald, D. W., Powell, C., Skeels, M. M., Mukai, M., & Pratt, W. (2010). Bringing the field into focus: user-centered design of a patient expertise locator. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Human Interaction (CHI 2010) (pp. 1675–1684). New York: ACMGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, L., & Borgatti, S. P. (2001). Knowing what we know: supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics, 30(2), 100–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cummings, J. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dourish, P. (2000). Technical and social features of categorization schemes. In: K., Schmidt; C., Simone, & S. L. Star (Eds.), Workshop classification schemes; CSCW 2000; Philadelphia, available at:http://www.isr.uci.edu/~jpd/publications.shtml
  18. Ehrlich, K. (2003). Locating expertise: Design issues for an expertise locator. In M. Ackerman, V. Pipek, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Sharing expertise: Beyond knowledge management. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  19. Ehrlich, K., & Shami, N. S. (2008). Searching for expertise. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Human Interaction (CHI 2008) (pp. 1093–1096). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  20. Fagrell, H. (2003). Newsmate: Providing timely knowledge to mobile and distributed news journalists. In M. S. Ackerman, V. Pipek, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Sharing expertise: Beyond knowledge management. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  21. Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46(12), 1554–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forlizzi, J. (2007). The product ecology: understanding social product use and supporting design culture. International Journal of Design. Google Scholar
  23. Groth, K., & Bowers, J. (2001). On finding things out: situating organisational knowledge in CSCW. Proceedings of ECSCW 2001, pp. 279–298. doi:10.1007/0-306-48019-0_15
  24. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hinrichs, J. (2000). Telecooperation in Engineering Offices - The problem of archiving. In Designing Cooperative Systems (COOP 2000) (pp. 259–274). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hinrichs, J., Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2005). Context grabbing: assigning metadata in large document collections. In Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2005) (pp. 367–386), Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Huysman, M., & de Wit, D. (2004). Practise of managing knowledge sharing: Towards a second wave of knowledge management. In Knowledge and process management, Vol. 11, No 2, 2004, pp. 81–92.Google Scholar
  28. Huysman, M., & Wulf, V. (2004). Social capital and information technology. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  29. Huysman, M., & Wulf, V. (2006). IT to support knowledge sharing in communities: towards a social capital analysis. Journal on Information Technology (JIT), 21(1), 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johri, A. (2011a). Look Ma, No Email! Blogs and IRC as primary and preferred communication tools in a distributed firm. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, March 2011, pp. 305–308.Google Scholar
  31. Johri, A. (2011b). Sociomaterial Bricolage: The Creation of Location-Spanning Work Practices by Global Software Engineers. Information and Software Technology, 53(9), 955–968. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.01.014
  32. Johri, A., Pipek, V., Wulf, V., & Veith, M. (2007).Bridging artifacts and actors: supporting knowledge and expertise sharing work practices through technology. Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Symposium on Computer Human Interaction for the Management of Information Technology (CHIMIT ‘07), pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  33. Jung, H., Stolterman, E., Ryan, W., Thompson, T., & Siegel, M. (2008). Toward a framework for ecologies of artifacts: how are digital artifacts interconnected within a personal life?, Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction.Google Scholar
  34. Lutters, W. G., & Ackerman, M. S. (2002). Achieving safety: A field study of boundary objects in aircraft technical support. In Proc. CSCW 2002, ACM Press, pp. 266–275.Google Scholar
  35. Mambrey, P., Pipek, V., & Rohde, M. (2003). Wissen und Lernen in virtuellen Organisationen (Knowledge and Learning in Virtual Organizations) (p. 279). Physica: Heidelberg (in German).Google Scholar
  36. Nam, K. K., Ackerman, M. S., & Adamic, L. (2009). Questions in, knowledge in?: a study of naver's question answering community. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Human Interaction (CHI 2009) (pp. 1093–1096). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  37. Nett, B., Meurer, J., & Stevens, G. (2008). Knowledge management-in-action in an EUD-oriented Software Enterprise. In M. S. Ackerman, R. Dieng-Kuntz, C. Simone, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Knowledge Management in Action (KMIA 2008), IFIP-Series 270 (pp. 139–150). Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Normark, M., & Randall, D. (2005). Local expertise at an emergency call centre. Proceedings of the ninth conference on European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 347–366). Paris: France.Google Scholar
  39. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Orlikowski, W. J. (1996). Evolving with notes: Organizational change around groupware technology. In C. Ciborra (Ed.), Groupware & Teamwork, J. Wiley, Chichester et al. (pp. 23–60).Google Scholar
  41. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Orr, J. E. (1990). Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: community memory in a service culture. In D. Middleton & D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective remembering (pp. 169–189). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (1999). A groupware’s life. In Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW’99) (pp. 199–219). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  44. Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2003). Pruning the answer garden: knowledge sharing in maintenance engineering. In Proceeding ECSCW 2003, Helsinki, Finland, 14–18 September, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
  45. Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2009). Infrastructuring: Towards an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology, in: Journal of the Association of Information System (JAIS), Volume 10, Issue 5, May 2009, pp. 306–332Google Scholar
  46. Pipek, V., Hinrichs, J., & Wulf, V. (2003). Sharing expertise: challenges for technical support. In M. S. Ackerman, V. Pipek, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Beyond knowledge management: sharing expertise. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  47. Pipek, V., Märker, O., Rinner, C., & Schmidt-Belz, B. (2000). Discussions and decisions: Enabling participation in design in geographical communities. In M. Gurstein (Ed.), Community informatics: Enabling communities with information and communication technologies (pp. 539–560). Hershey, PA: IDEA Group Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Reichling, T., & Veith, M. (2005). Expertise sharing in a heterogeneous organizational environment, In Proceedings of the Ninth ECSCW (pp. 325–345), Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Reichling, T., & Wulf, V. (2009). Expert recommender system in practice: Evaluating semiautomatic profile generation. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Human Interaction (CHI 2009) (pp. 59–68). New York: ACMGoogle Scholar
  50. Reichling, T., Veith, M., Wulf, V.; Expert Recommender (2007). Designing for a network organization. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing (JCSCW), Vol. 16, No. 4–5, pp. 431–465Google Scholar
  51. Rittenbruch, M., Kahler, H., & Cremers, A. B. (1998). Supporting cooperation in a virtual organization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland, p. 30–38.Google Scholar
  52. Rohde, M. (2007). Integrated Organization and Technology Development (OTD) and the impact of socio-cultural concepts—A CSCW Perspective. Ph.D. thesis, Datalogiske skrifter, University of Roskilde, Denmark.Google Scholar
  53. Saeed, S., Pipek, V., Rohde, M., & Wulf, V. (2010). Managing nomadic knowledge: a case study of the European social forum. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI 2010) (pp. 537–546). New York: ACMGoogle Scholar
  54. Schultze, U., & Leidner, D. E. (2002). Studying knowledge management in information systems research: discourses and theoretical assumptions. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simone, C., & Sarini, M. (2001). Adaptability of classification schemes in cooperation: What does it mean? In W. Prinz, M. Jarke, Y. Rogers, K. Schmidt, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Proceedings of ECSCW 2001 (pp. 19–38). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  56. Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Trigg, R. H., Blomberg, J., & Suchman, L. (1999). Moving document collections online: The evolution of a shared repository. In S. Bødker, M. Kyng, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), Proceedings of ECSCW 99 (pp. 331–350). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Won, M., & Pipek, V. (2003). Sharing knowledge on knowledge—the eXact peripheral expertise awareness system. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 9(12), 1388–1397.Google Scholar
  59. Wulf, V., & Rohde, M. (1995). Towards an integrated organization and technology development. In Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive system (pp. 55–64). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  60. Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). An Analysis and Critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach. Proceedings of DIS 2010, Aarhus Denmark.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Information SystemsUniversity of SiegenSiegenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Engineering EducationVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations