Advertisement

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 1–46 | Cite as

Making Space for a New Medium: On the Use of Electronic Mail in a Newspaper Newsroom

  • Amelie Hössjer
  • Kerstin Severinson Eklundh
Article

Abstract

Within the field of computer-supported cooperative work, there are a continuously growing number of studies of the use of electronic media in groups and organisations. Despite the existence of this impressive body of research, there have been comparatively few in-depth studies of how the computer as a medium of communication is integrated in specific professional practices. The present study examines the role of electronic mail in a medium-sized Swedish newspaper office (newsroom) environment. Using an ethnographic perspective, the study attempts to combine two approaches: it is both focused on the social and communicative processes that are affected by the use of email and oriented toward the messages as such, looking at what kind of interaction is produced through particular email exchanges. Data have been collected during repeated observations, interviews and study of documents and artefacts in the newsroom environment over a period of almost 3 years. The picture that has emerged suggests that it is not the medium as such, but its interaction with other contextual preconditions that is decisive for the effects of the introduction of email. Important factors are the physical localization of co-workers in the near and remote editorial environment as well as their organisational roles in the time-critical news production process. Together, these relationships create a significantly more complex picture than previous studies of what happens when a new communication technology is introduced.

Key words

electronic mail computer-mediated communication workplace studies newspaper newsroom environment ethnographic study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out within the project “Decision Processes and Technology Use in Newspaper Editorial Work”, funded by The Swedish Council for Work Life Research (now a part of the Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems). We are grateful to Else Nygren for valuable comments on previous versions of the manuscript, and to Donald MacQueen for help with improving the language.

References

  1. Andreassen, H.K., M. Trondsen, P.E. Kummervold, D. Gammon and P. Hjortdahl (2006): Patients Who Use E-Mediated Communication with Their Doctor: New Constructions of Trust in the Patient–Doctor Relationship. Qualitative Health Research, vol. 16, pp. 238–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bair, J (1979)): The Impact of Office Automation. In R. Uhlig, D. Farber and J. Bair (eds): The Office of The FutureNew York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, A. (1998): Cyberspace Couples Finding Romance Online Then Meeting for the First Time in Real Life. CMC Magazine. www.december.com/cmc/mag/1998/jul/baker.html.
  4. Bälter, O. (1998): Electronic Mail in a Working Context. Doctoral Thesis, Interaction and Presentation Laboratory. Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Numerical Analysis and Computer Science, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  5. Bälter, O. and C. Sidner (2002): Bifrost Inbox Organizer: Giving Users Control over the Inbox. In O.W Bertelsen, S. Bødker, and K. Kuutti (eds), Proceedings of NordiCHI 2002 (pp. 111–118). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  6. Bannon, L. and K. Schmidt (eds) (1993): Issues of Supporting Organizational Context in CSCW Systems. COMIC, Esprit Basic Research Project 6225. Lancaster, UK, Computing Department, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  7. Baron, N.S. (1998): Letters by Phone or Speech by Other Means: The Linguistics of E-mail. Language and Communication, vol. 18, pp. 133–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baym, N.K. (1996): Agreement and Disagreement in Computer-Mediated Discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 29(4), pp. 315–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bellotti, V., N. Ducheneaut, M. Howard and I. Smith (2003): Taking Email to Task: The Design and Evaluation of a Task Management Centered Email Tool. Proceedings of the ACM CHI'2003 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Ft Lauderdale, Florida, USA, ACM Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bertacco, M. and A. Deponte (2005): Email as a Speed-Facilitating Device: A Contribution to the Reduced-Cues Perspective on Communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 10(3), article 2. http//jcmc.Indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/bertacco.html.
  11. Bishop, L. and D.I. Levine (1999): Computer-Mediated Communication as Employee Voice: A Case Study. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 52(2), pp. 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonebake, K. (2002): College Students’ Internet Use, Relationship Formation, and Personality Correlates. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, vol. 5(2), pp. 551–558.Google Scholar
  13. Boneva, B., R. Kraut and D. Frohlich (2001): Using E-mail for Personal Relationships: The Difference Gender Makes. American Behavioral Scientist. Special Issue on the Internet and Everyday Life, vol. 45(3), pp. 530–549.Google Scholar
  14. Börestam Uhlmann, U. (1994): Skandinaver samtalar: Språkliga och interaktionella strategier i samtal mellan danskar, norrmän och svenskar. (Skrifter utgivna av Institutionen för Nordiska språk vid Uppsala universitet 38.) Uppsala UniversitetGoogle Scholar
  15. Brigham, M. and J.M Corbett (1997): E-mail, Power and the Constitution of Organizational Reality. New Technology, Work and Employment, vol. 12(1), pp. 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burke, A., K. Aytes and L. Chidambaram (2001): Media Effects on the Development of Cohesion and Process Satisfaction in Computer-Supported Workgroups: An Analysis of Results from Two Longitudinal Studies. Information Technology and People, vol. 14(2), pp. 122–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Castrén, J., M. Niemi and I. Virjo (2005): Use of Email for Patient Communication in Student Health Care: A Cross-sectional Study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 5(2). http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472–6947/5/2.
  18. Cherny, L. (1999): Conversation and Community: Chat in a Virtual World. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
  19. Coate, J. (1998): Cyberspace Innkeeping: Building Online Community. http://cervisa.com/innkeeping.html.
  20. Collot, M. and N. Belmore (1996): Electronic Language: A New Variety of English. In S.C. Herring (ed): Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural PerspectivesAmsterdam: John Benjamin, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar
  21. Crystal, D. (2001): Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Culnan, M.J. and M.L. Markus (1987): Information Technologies. In F.M. Jablin, L.L. Putnam, K.H. Roberts and L.W. Porter (eds): Handbook of Organizational CommunicationsLondon: Sage, pp. 420–443.Google Scholar
  23. Czarniawska, B. (1998): A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies (Qualitative Research Method Series NR 43). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Daft, R. and R. Lengel (1984): Information Richness: A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organizational Design. In L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw (eds): Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 6, pp. 191–233 Homewood, IL: JAI.Google Scholar
  25. Danet, B., L. Ruedenberg and Y. Rosenbaum-Tamari (1997): Hmmm.. Where is that Smoke Coming From? Writing Play and Performance on Internet Relay Chat. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 2(4). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/danet.html.
  26. Dixon-Woods, M. (2003): What Can Ethnography Do for Quality and Safety in Health Care? Quality and Safety in Health Care, vol. 12, pp. 326–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ducheneaut, N. and V. Bellotti (2001): Email as Habitat: An Exploration of Embedded Personal Information Management. ACM Interactions, vol. 8(1), pp. 30–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Duthler, K.W. (2006): The Politeness of Requests Made Via Email and Voicemail: Support for the Hyperpersonal Model. Journal of Computer-Mediated-Communication, vol. 11(2). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/duthler.html.
  29. Eelen, G. (2001): A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
  30. El-Shinnawy, M. and M.L. Markus (1997): The Poverty of Media Richness Theory: Explaining People’s Choice of Electronic Mail. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 46, pp. 443–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferrara, K., H. Brunner and G. Whittemore (1991): Interactive Written Discourse as an Emergent Register. Written Communication, vol. 8(1), pp. 8–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fisher, D., A.J. Brush, E. Gleave and M. Smith (2006): Revisiting Whittaker & Sidner’s “Email Overload” Ten Years Later. Proceedings of CSCW'06, November 4–8, 2006, Banff, Alberta, Canada. ACM.Google Scholar
  33. Fletcher, J. (1999): Disappearing Acts. Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Garfinkel, H. (1967): Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  35. Garton, L. and B. Wellman (1995): Social Impacts of Electronic Mail in Organizations: A Review of the Research Literature. Communications Yearbook, vol. 18, pp. 434–453.Google Scholar
  36. Gaster, B., C.L. Knight, D.E. DeWitt, J.V. Sheffield, N.P. Assefi and D. Buchwald (2003): Physicans’ Use and Attitudes Toward Electronic Mail for Patient Communication. Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 18, pp. 385–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Groth, K. (2004): On Knowing Who Knows – An Alternative Approach to Knowledge Management. Ph.D. thesis, TRITA-NA-0428, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm.Google Scholar
  38. Hammersley, M. and P. Atkinson (1995): Ethnography. Principles in Practice (2nd edn.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Hård af Segerstad, Y. (2002): Use and Adaptation of Written Language to Conditions of Computer-Mediated Communication. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics 22, Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.Google Scholar
  40. Haythornthwaite, C. and S. Shoemaker (2000): Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 6(1). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/haythornthwaite.html.
  41. Hede, M. (2002): Intranät – Nätet bakom brandväggar. In P. Dahlgren (ed): Internet, Medier Och KommunikationLund: Studentlitteratur, pp. 173–201.Google Scholar
  42. Heim, M. (1987): Electric Language: A Philosophical Study of Word Processing. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Herring, S. (1996): Two Variants of an Electronic Message Schema. In S. Herring (ed): Computer-Mediated Communication. Linguistic, Social and Cross-cultural Perspectives (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 39)Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  44. Herring, S.C. (2001): Computer-Mediated Discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. Hamilton (eds): The Handbook of Discourse AnalysisOxford: Blackwell, pp. 612–634.Google Scholar
  45. Hiltz, S.R. and M. Turoff (1993): The Network Nation: Human Communication Via computer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Holmes, J. and S. Schnurr (2005): Politeness, Humour and Gender in the Workplace: Negotiating Norms and Identifying Contestation. Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 1, pp. 121–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Horrigan, J.B. and L. Rainie (2002): Emails that Matter: Changing Patterns of Internet Use Over a Year’s Time. IT & Society, vol. 1(1), pp. 135–150.Google Scholar
  48. Hössjer, A. (2002): Former för dialog och beslut. Om växling mellan kommunikationsformer och bruk av media i redaktionellt tidningsarbete. Technical report TRITA_NA_P0301, IPLab 206, Department of Numerical Analysis and Computer Science, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  49. Hössjer, A. (2006): Externa brev och intern vardagskommunikation. Om bruket av e-post på en tidningsredaktion. Technical report IPLab 265, Department of Numerical Analysis and Computer Science, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  50. Hössjer, A. (2008): At my age you feel fine... Politeness in Emails When Publishing a Print Journal. In Herring, S. Stein, D. And Virtanen T. (eds): Pragmatics of CMC. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (in press).Google Scholar
  51. Houston, T.K., D.Z. Sands, B.R. Nash and D.E. Ford (2003): Experiences of Physicians Who Frequently Use E-mail with Patients. Health Communication, vol. 15, pp. 515–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jackson, T., R.J. Dawson and D. Wilson (2001): The Cost of Email Interruption. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, vol. 5(1), pp. 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kahai, S.S. and R.B. Cooper (2003): Exploring the Core Concepts of Media Richness Theory: The Impact of Cue Multiplicity and Feedback Immediacy on Decision Quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 20(1), pp. 263–299.Google Scholar
  54. Karlsson, A.-M. (2003): Skrift och texter på bygget. En undersökning av vad och hur några byggnadsarbetare läser och skriver, verbalt och visuellt, i sitt arbete (Projektet Skriftbruk i arbetslivet, www.nordiska.su.se/skriftbruk, Rapport 2, 2003). Stockholm.
  55. Katz, S.J., C.A. Moyer, D.T. Cox and D.T. Stern (2003): Effect of a Triage-Based E-mail System on Clinic Resource use and Patient and Physician Satisfaction in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 18, pp. 736–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kettinger, W.J. and V. Grover (1997): The Use of Computer-Mediated Communication in an Interorganizational Context. Decision Sciences, vol. 28(3), pp. 513–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kiesler, S., J. Siegel and T.W. McGuire (1984): Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication. American Psychologist, vol. 39(10), pp. 53–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Köhler, H. (1986): Inflytande och datorbaserade kommunikationssystem. Institutionen för data- och systemvetenskap, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  59. Kraut, R., C. Steinfeld, A. Chan, B. Butler and A. Hoag (1998): Coordination and Virtualization: the Role of Electronic Networks and Personal Relationships. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 3(4).Google Scholar
  60. Kraut, R.E., S.R. Fussell, S.E. Brennan and J. Siegel (2002): Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration: Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work. In Pamela J. Hinds and Sara Kiesler (eds): Distributed Work, pp. 137–164 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  61. Lantz, A. (1998): Heavy Users of Electronic Mail. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 10(4), pp. 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lea, M. (ed) (1992): Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  63. Ljungberg, F. (1996): An Initial Exploration of Communication Overflow. Paper Presented at the 2nd International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP’96), Sophia-Antipolis, France.Google Scholar
  64. Mackay, W.E. (1988): Diversity in the Use of Electronic Mail: A Preliminary Inquiry. ACM Transactions in Office Information Systems, vol. 6(4), pp. 380–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McDonald, D.W. and M.S. Ackerman (1998): Just talk to me. A field study of expertise location. Proceedings of CSCW’98. New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  66. McKenny, J.L., M.H. Zack and V.S. Doherty (1992): Complementary Communication Media: A Comparison of Electronic Mail and Face-To-Face Communication in a Programming Team. In N. Nohria and R.G. Eccles (eds): Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and ActionBoston: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 262–287.Google Scholar
  67. Miller, C.R. (1984): Genre as Social Action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 70, pp. 151–167.Google Scholar
  68. Mills, S. (2003): Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Morse, J.M. (1994): Designing Funded Qualitative Research. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds): Qualitative Research, pp. 220–235 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Murray, D. (1988): The Context of Oral and Written Language\appfunc: A Framework for Mode and Medium Switching. Language and Society, vol. 17, pp. 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Palme, Jacob (1995): Electronic Mail. Norwood, MA: Artech House.Google Scholar
  72. Parks, M.R. and K. Floyd (1996): Making Friends in Cyberspace. Journal of Communication, vol. 46, pp. 80–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Preece, J., D. Maloney-Krichmar and C. Abras (2003): History of Online Communities. In B. Wellman (ed): Encyclopedia of Community, pp. 1023–1027. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Randall, D., J.A. Hughes and D. Shapiro (1994): Using Ethnography to Inform Systems Design. Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 4(1–2), pp. 9–28.Google Scholar
  75. Rice, R.E. (1994): Network Analysis and Computer-Mediated Communication Systems. In S. Wasserman and J. Galaskiwicz (eds): Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 167–203 Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  76. Rice, R.E. and G. Love (1987): Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research, vol. 14, pp. 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Romm, C.T. and N. Pliskin (1997): Toward a Virtual Politicking Model. Communications of the ACM, vol. 40(11), pp. 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rubin, Lois (2002): I Just Think Maybe You Could...: Peer Critiquing Through Online Conversations. Teaching English in the Two Year College, vol. 29(4), pp. 382–392.Google Scholar
  79. Savage, J. (2006): Ethnographic Evidence: The Value of Applied Ethnography in Healthcare. In Journal of Research in Nursing, vol. 11, pp. 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Severinson Eklundh, K. (1986): Dialogue Processes in Computer-Mediated Communication. A Study of Letters in the COM System. Ph.D. Thesis, Linköping Studies in Arts and Science 6. Linköping.Google Scholar
  81. Severinson Eklundh, K. (1996): A Dialogue Perspective on Electronic Mail: Implications for Interface Design. In H. van Oostendorp and S. de Mul (eds): Cognitive Aspects of Electronic Text ProcessingNorwood, N.J., USA: Ablex.Google Scholar
  82. Severinson Eklundh, K. (2008): To Quote or not to Quote: Setting the Context for Computer-Mediated Dialogues. In S.C. Herring (ed.): Computer-Mediated Conversation. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press (in press).Google Scholar
  83. Shank, G. (1993): Abductive Multiloguing. The Semiotic Dynamics of Navigating the Net. The Arachnet Electronic Journal on Virtual Culture, vol. 1(1), March 1993. http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/academic/communications/papers/ejvc/SHANK.V1N1.
  84. Shedletsky, L.J. and J.E. Aitken (2004): Human Communication on the Internet. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  85. Short, J., E. Williams and B. Christie (1976): The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  86. Skovholt, K. and J. Svennevig (2006): Email Copies in Workplace Interaction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 12, pp. 42–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sommerville, I., T. Rodden, R. Bentley and P. Sawyer (1992): Sociologists can be Surprisingly Useful in Interactive Systems Design. People and Computers VII: Proceedings of HCI'92, York University, September 1992, Eds A. Monk, D. Diaper and M. Harrison, pp. 341–354.Google Scholar
  88. Spradley, J.P. (1980): Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  89. Sproull, L. and S. Kiesler (1991): Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  90. Stafford, L, S.L. Kline and J. Dimmick (1999): Home E-mail: Relational Maintenance and Gratification Opportunities. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 43, 659–669.Google Scholar
  91. Suchman, L. (1987): Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Tyler, J.T. and J.C. Tang (2003): When Can I Expect an Email Response? A Study of Rhythms in Email Usage. Proceedings of ECSCW2003, pp.239–258.Google Scholar
  93. Waldvogel, J. (2001): Email and Workplace Communication: A Literature Review. Language in the Workplace Occasional Papers 3. http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/publications/lwp.aspx.
  94. Walther, J.B. and J.K. Burgoon (1992): Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction. Human Communication Research, vol. 19, pp. 50–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Watts, R. (1992): Relevance and Relational Work: Linguistic Politeness and Politic Behaviour. Multilingual, vol. 8(2/3), pp. 131–166.Google Scholar
  96. Watts, R. (2003): Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Weisenband, S.P., T. Schneider and T. Connolly (1995): Electronic Communication and Social Information. Status Salience and Status Differences. Academic Management Journal, vol. 38(4), pp. 1124–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wellman, B. and D. Tindall (1993): Reach Out and Touch Some Bodies: How Social Networks Connect Telephone Networks. In W. Richards Jr and G. Barnett (eds): Progress in Communicative Sciences, vol. 12, pp. 63–93 Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  99. Whittaker, S. and C. Sidner (1996): Email Overload: Exploring Personal Information Management of Email. Proceedings of CHI’96, pp. 276–283.Google Scholar
  100. Wierzbicka, A. (1999): Emotions Across Languages and Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Wilkins, H. (1991): Computer Talk. Written Communication, vol. 8(1), pp. 56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Yates, J. (1989): Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Yates, S.J. (1996): Oral and Written Aspects of Computer Conferencing. In S.C. Herring (ed): Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, pp. 29–46 Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  104. Yell, S. (2003): New for Old? Converging Media and E-mail Practices in the Workplace. Australian Journal of Communication, vol. 30(1), pp. 93–108.Google Scholar
  105. Yum, Y. and K. Hara (2005): Computer-Mediated Relationship Development: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, vol. 11(1), http://jmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue1/yum.html.
  106. Zack, M.H. (1993): Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups. Information Systems Research, vol. 4(3), pp. 207–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information Science, Division of Media and CommunicationUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.School of Computer Science and CommunicationRoyal Institute of Technology (KTH)StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations