Advertisement

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 231–264 | Cite as

How Can I Help You? Call Centres, Classification Work and Coordination

  • David MartinEmail author
  • Jacki O’neill
  • Dave Randall
  • Mark Rouncefield
Article

Abstract

As a comparatively novel but increasingly pervasive organizational arrangement, call centres have been a focus for much recent research. This paper identifies lessons for organizational and technological design through an examination of call centres and ‘classification work’ – explicating what Star [1992, Systems/Practice vol. 5, pp. 395–410] terms the ‘open black box’. Classification is a central means by which organizations standardize procedure, assess productivity, develop services and re-organize their business. Nevertheless, as Bowker and Star [1999, Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge MA: MIT Press] have pointed out, we know relatively little about the work that goes into making classification schema what they are. We will suggest that a focus on classification ‘work’ in this context is a useful exemplar of the need for some kind of ‘meta-analysis’ in ethnographic work also. If standardization is a major ambition for organizations under late capitalism, then comparison might be seen as a related but as-yet unrealized one for ethnographers. In this paper, we attempt an initial cut at a comparative approach, focusing on classification because it seemed to be the primary issue that emerged when we compared studies. Moreover, if technology is the principal means through which procedure and practice is implemented and if, as we believe, classifications are becoming ever more explicitly embedded within it (for instance with the development of so-called ‘semantic web’ and associated approaches to ontology-based design), then there is clearly a case for identifying some themes which might underpin classification work in a given domain.

Keywords

call centres categorization classification ethnography ethnomethodology ontology 

References

  1. Ackerman, M.S. and C. Halverson (1998): Considering an Organization’s Memory. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 98). Seattle, WA: © ACM Press, pp. 39–48Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. and W. Sharrock (1993): Can Organizations Afford Knowledge? Journal of CSCW, vol. 1, no.3, pp. 143–161, London: Kluwer Google Scholar
  3. Arussy L. (2002) Don’t Take Calls, Make Contact. Harvard Business Review, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 16–17Google Scholar
  4. Bain P., Watson A., Mulvey G., Taylor P., Gall G. (2003) Taylorism, Targets and the Quantity–Quality Dichotomy in Call Centres. New Technology, Work and Employment. vol 17, no. 3, pp. 154–169Google Scholar
  5. Beyer H., Holzblatt K. (1998) Contextual Design: Defining Customer-centred Systems. San Francisco: Morgan KaufmannGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowers, J. and D. Martin (2000): Machinery in the New Factories: Interaction and Technology in a Banks Telephone Call Centre. In Proceeding of CSCW 2000. Philadelphia, © ACM PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowker G., Star S.L. (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Buscher, M., P. Mogenson and D. Shapiro (2001): Spaces of Practice. Proceedings of ECSCW 2001. Bonn, Germany 16–20th September. KluwerGoogle Scholar
  9. Crabtree, A., T. Hemmings and T. Rodden (2002): Pattern-based Support for Interactive Design in Domestic Settings. Proceedings of the 2002 Symposium on Designing Interactive System. London: ACM PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Dourish, P. (2000): Technical and Social Features o Categorization Schemes. Workshop on Classification Schemes and Cooperative Work. CSCW 2000, Philadelphia, © ACM PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Dourish P. (2001) Where the Action is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge (MA) and London: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Dourish P, Button G. (1998) On “Technomethodology”: Foundational Relationships between Ethnomethodology and System Design. Human–Computer Interaction vol 13, no. 4, pp. 395–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fensel D. (2003) Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce. London: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  14. Garfinkel H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  15. Glaser B. (1998) Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: AldineGoogle Scholar
  17. Grudin, J. (1990): The Computer Reaches Out: The Historical Continuity of Interface Design. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ‘90. Seattle: ACM Press. pp. 19–26Google Scholar
  18. Harper, R., D . Randall and M. Rouncefield, (2000). Organisational Change in Retail Finance: An Ethnographic Perspective, Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartswood M., Procter R., Slack R., Voß A., Büscher M., Rouncefield M., Rouchy P. (2002) Co-realisation: Towards a Principled Synthesis of Ethnomethodology and Participatory Design. The Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 9–30Google Scholar
  20. Hochschild A.R. (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. University of California Press. BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  21. Hughes, J., V. King, T. Rodden and H. Andersen (1994): Moving Out from the Control Room: Ethnography in System Design. Proceedings of ACM CSCW’94 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. ACM Press. pp. 429–439Google Scholar
  22. Hughes, J., J. O’Brien, J. Rodden, M. Rouncefield and S. Blythin (1997): Designing with Ethnography: A Presentation Framework for Design. Proceedings of DIS’97: Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, & Techniques 1997. ACM Press. pp. 147–158Google Scholar
  23. Luff, P., J. Hindmarsh and C.C. Heath (eds) (2000): Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Marcus, G. (1998): Ethnography through Thick and Thin. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin, D. (2000): Ethnomethodology and Computer Systems Design: Interaction at the Boundaries of Organizations. Ph.D. Thesis, Manchester University. Copies available from david.martin@xrce.xerox.comGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin, D., T. Rodden, M. Rouncefield, I. Sommerville and S. Viller (2001): Finding Patterns in the Fieldwork. Proceedings of ECSCW 2001. Bonn, Dordecht: KluwerGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin, D. and M. Rouncefield (2003): Making the Organisation Come Alive: Talking Through and about the Technology in Remote Banking. Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 18, nos. 1 and 2, pp. 111–148, Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin, D., M. Rouncefield and I. Sommerville (2002): Applying Patterns of Cooperative Interaction to Work (Re)Design: E-government and Planning. Proceedings of CHI 2002. Minneapolis, Minnesota: ACM pressGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin, D., D. Wastell and J. Bowers (1998): Ethnographically Informed Systems Design (EISD): The Development and Evaluation of an Internet-based Electronic Banking Application. Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Aix-en-Provence, France, June 1998Google Scholar
  30. Noblit, G.W. and R. Dwight Hare (1988): Meta-ethnography: Synthesising Qualitative Studies. London: SageGoogle Scholar
  31. Pentland B.T. (1992) Organizing Moves in Software Support Hot Lines. Administrative Science Quarterly vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 527–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pettersson, M., D. Randall and B. Hegelson (2002): Ambiguities, Awareness and Economy: A Study of Emergency Services Work. Proceedings of CSCW 2002. New Orleans, Loiusiana, USA: ACM PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Plowman, L., Y. Rogers and M. Ramage (1995): What are Workplace Studies for? Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 1995). London: Kluwer, pp. 309–324Google Scholar
  34. Purcell J., Hutchinson S., Kinnie N. (2000) ‘Fun and Surveillance’: The Paradox of High Commitment Management in Call Centres. International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 967–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pycock, J., K. Palfreyman, J. Allanson and G. Button (1998): Representing Fieldwork and Articulating Requirements Through VR. In Proceedings of ACM CSCW ‘98 Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work. ACM PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Randall, D., J.A. Hughes, J. O’Brien and M. Rouncefield (1996): Organizational Memory and CSCW: Supporting the ‘Mavis Phenomenon’. Proceedings of OzCHI 96. Hamilton, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  37. Randall, D., J.A. Hughes and D. Shapiro (1992): Using Ethnography to Inform Systems Design. Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 4, nos. 1 and 2, pp. 9–28Google Scholar
  38. Richardson, R. (1994): Organizational and Locational Implications of New Telemediated Services. In R. Mansell (ed): Information, Control and Technical Change. ASLIB Google Scholar
  39. Schmidt, K. (1997): Of Maps and Scripts: The Status of Formal Constructs in Cooperative Work. Proceedings of GROUP 1997. ACM PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Schon, D. and J. Bennet (1996): Reflective Conversation with Materials. In T. Winograd (ed) Bringing Design to Software. New York: Addison WesleyGoogle Scholar
  41. Sharrock, W. and D. Randall (2004): Ethnography, ethnomethodology and the problem of generalisation in design. European Journal of Information Systems, v.13 n.3, pp.186–194, September 2004Google Scholar
  42. Simone, C. and M. Sarini (2001): Adaptability of Classification Schemes in Cooperation: What Does it Mean? In Proceeedings of ECSCW 2001. Bonn, Germany: Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  43. Star S.L. (1992) The Trojan Door: Organizations, Work, and the ‘Open Black Box’. Systems/Practice vol. 5, pp. 395–410Google Scholar
  44. Strauss A., Corbin J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: SageGoogle Scholar
  45. Suchman L. (1967) Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: CUPGoogle Scholar
  46. Suchman L. (1995) Making Work Visible. Special Issue of Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, no. 9, pp.56–64Google Scholar
  47. Twidale, M., D. Randall and R. Bentley (1994): Situated Evaluation for Cooperative Systems. Proceedings of CSCW ’94. Chapel Hill: © ACM PressGoogle Scholar
  48. Twidale, M., T. Rodden and I. Sommerville (1993): The Designers Notepad: Supporting and Understanding Cooperative Design. In Proceedings of ECSCW ‘93, Milan, pp. 93–108, Dordrecht: KluwerGoogle Scholar
  49. Viller, S. and I. Sommerville (1999): Coherence: An Approach to Representing Ethnographic Analyses in System Design. Human–Computer Interaction, vol 14, pp. 9–41, Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  50. Whalen, J. and E. Vinkhuyzen (1999): Expert Sytems in (Inter)action: Diagnosing Document Machine Problems Over The Telephone. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh and C.C. Heath (eds): (2000) Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  51. Whalen, J. et al. (2002) Improvisational Choreography in Teleservice Work. British Journal of Sociology vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 239–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wittgenstein L. (1958) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  53. Woolgar S. (1991) Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials. In: J. Law (ed) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Martin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jacki O’neill
    • 2
  • Dave Randall
    • 3
  • Mark Rouncefield
    • 2
  1. 1.Xerox Research Centre EuropeGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.Computing DepartmentLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  3. 3.Manchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations