Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 15, Issue 5–6, pp 419–441 | Cite as

The Wireless Nursing Call System: Politics of Discourse, Technology and Dependability in a Pilot Project

Article

Abstract

This paper discusses a research project in which social scientists were involved both as analysts and supporters during a pilot with a new wireless nursing call system. The case thus exemplifies an attempt to participate in developing dependable health care systems and offers insight into the challenges of developing and supporting such systems. The analysis proposes that while dependability is not simply a technical issue, neither is it something, which can be improved merely by adding a social dimension. Instead, it argues that dependability is a relative concept, which may mean different things conditional on how it is specified in practice and who gets to do this. This relativity makes it important to relate the question of how to support dependable health care systems to an analysis of both the politics of technology within specific projects and to the politics of discourse, through which the researcher becomes involved in such projects.

dependability discourse health care politics technology 

Notes

Acknowledgment

I would like to thank Nina Boulus and, especially, Servane Mason for their observations and suggestions. I would like to acknowledge the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for their support of the ACTION for Health Research Program, funded through the Initiative for a New Economy Collaborative Research Initiative.

References

  1. Balka E., Kahnamoui N. (2004): Technology Trouble? Talk to Us( Findings from an Ethnographic Field Study. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices Vol. 1. Toronto, ON, July 27–31, 2004. New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 224–234Google Scholar
  2. Balka E., Wagner I., Jensen C.B. (2005): Reconfiguring Critical Computing in an Era of Configurability. Proceedings of the 4th decennial Aarhus Conference on critical computing: Between sense and sensibility, Denmark: ACM Press, pp. 79–89Google Scholar
  3. Berg M. (2001): Implementing Information Systems in Health Care Organizations: Myths and Challenges International Journal of Medical Informatics, 64: 143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowers J. (1992): The Politics of Formalism. In: Martin L. (ed.): Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo, and Singapore: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 232–262Google Scholar
  5. Bødker S., Ehn P., Knudsen J., Kyng M., Madsen K.H. (1988): Computer Support for Cooperative Design, Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press, pp. 377–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper G., Bowers J. (1995) Representing the User: Notes on the Disciplinary Rhetoric of HCI. In: Thomas P.J. (ed.): The Social and Interactionial Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–66Google Scholar
  7. Crabtree A. (2003), Designing Collaborative Systems: A Practical Guide to Ethnography. New York London, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  8. Ehrlich K., Cash D. (1999): The Invisible World of Intermediaries: A Cautionary Tale. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal 8(1–2): 147–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forsythe D. (1992) Blaming the User in Medical Informatics: The Cultural Nature of Scientific Practice Knowledge and Society 9: 95–111Google Scholar
  10. Garrety K., Badham R. (2004) User-Centered Design and the Normative Politics of Technology Science, Technology, and Human Values 29(2): 191–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hartswood M., Rob P., Roger S., Alex V., Monika B., Mark R., Philippe R., (2002) Co-realisation: Towards a principled synthesis of ethnomethodology and participatory design Scandinavian Journal of Informatics, 14(2): 9–30Google Scholar
  12. Jensen, C.B. (2006): Technologic: Conceptualizing Organizational Transformation with the Electronic Patient Record. Signs, Systems, and Action, 2(1): 41–59Google Scholar
  13. Lyotard J.-F. (1993): The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Schmidt K., Bannon L. (1992): Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) An International Journal 1(1–2): 7–40Google Scholar
  15. Schmidt K., Simone C. (1996): Coordination Mechanisms: Towards a Conceptual Foundation of CSCW Systems Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal, 5:155–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shapiro, D. (1994): The Limits of Ethnography: Combining Social Sciences for CSCW, PDC’ 94: Proceeding of the Participatory Design Conference, Chapel Hill, NC U.S.A., 27–28 October 1994, pp. 417–428Google Scholar
  17. Sommerville, I., D. Guy, C. Karen and R. Mark (2002): A Dependability Model for Domestic Systems. Proc. SAFECOMP 2003, Edinburgh, September 2003, Springer, 103–15Google Scholar
  18. Suchman, L. (1994): Supporting Articulation Work. In I.V. Eriksson, B.A. Kitchenham and K.G. Tijdens (eds): Proceedings of the Fifth IFIP WG 9.1 International Conference on Women, Work and Computerisation: Breaking Old Boundaries, Building New Forms. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 46–60Google Scholar
  19. Vann K., Bowker G.C. (2001): Instrumentalizing the Truth of Practice Social Epistemology 15(3): 247–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Westerberg K. (1999): Collaborative Networks among Female Middle Managers in a Hierarchical Organization. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal 8(1–2): 95–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Woolgar S. (1991): Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials. In: Law J. (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. Loondon: Routledge, pp. 58–97Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information and Media StudiesUniversity of Aarhus8200 Aarhus NDenmark

Personalised recommendations