Advertisement

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 251–255 | Cite as

Special Issue: Collaboration in e-Research

  • Marina Jirotka
  • Rob Procter
  • Tom Rodden
  • Geoffrey C. Bowker
Article

Recent innovations in research processes and the technologies that support them seem to offer the potential for revolutionary changes in the way that science is undertaken. These changes have occurred at a time when research practices that conform to conventional disciplinary and institutional structures are increasingly recognised as being inadequate to meet new scientific challenges. In the UK, the e-Science programme has suggested a way to address these challenges through the development of global, collaborative multi-disciplinary research communities that, in turn, rely upon the construction of more powerful computational, data and communication infrastructures.1

Thus, the e-Science vision is not only concerned with changing the dynamics of science but also with providing technologies that will facilitate the emergence of these new forms of scientific practice. These advanced technological infrastructures, referred to as the ‘Grid’ (Foster and Kesselman, 2004) in the UK, or...

Keywords

Virtual Organisation Computer Support Cooperative Work Long Term Ecological Research Ubiquitous Computing Environment User Centre Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Atkins, D. (2003): Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure. Report of the National Science Foundation Blue Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. February. http://www.communitytechnology.org/nsf_ci_report.
  2. Caldas, A. (2003): Are Newsgroups Extending “Invisible Colleges” into the Digital Infrastructure of Science? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Finholt, T.A. (2003): Collaboratories as a New Form of Scientific Organization. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Foster, I. and C. Kesselman (eds.) (2004): The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  5. Olson, G.M., D. Atkins, R. Clauer, T. Weymouth, A. Prakash, T. Finholt, F. Jahanian, and C. Rasmussen (2001): Technology to support distributed team science: The first phase of the Upper Atmospheric Research Collaboratory (UARC) In G.M. Olson, T. Malone and J. Smith (eds.): Coordination theory and collaboration technology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 761–783.)Google Scholar
  6. Hey, T. and A. Trefethen (2003): The Data Deluge: An e-Science Perspective. Grid Computing – Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality, Wiley. Retrieved from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/escience/documents/report_datadeluge.pdf. on 20 January 2005.
  7. Jirotka, M., R. Procter, M. Hartswood, R. Slack, C. Coopmans, C. Hinds, and A. Voss (2005): Collaboration and Trust in Healthcare Innovation: The eDiaMoND Case Study. Journal of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, vol.14, no. 4., pp. 369–398Google Scholar
  8. Wouters, P. (2005): The Virtual Knowledge Studio for the Humanities and Social Sciences. In Proc 1st Int. Conf. On e-Social Science, Manchester. http://www.ncess.ac.uk/events/conference/programme/papers/ncess2005_paper_Wouters.pdf.
  9. Kanfer, A., B. Bruce, C. Haythornthwaite, N. Burbules, J. Wade, G. Bowker, and J. Porac (2000): Modeling Distributed Knowledge Processes in Next Generation Multidisciplinary Alliances. In Proc. Academia/Industry Working Conference on Research Challenges.Google Scholar
  10. Schraefel, m.c., G. Hughes, H. Mills, G. Smith and J. Frey (2004): Making Tea: Iterative Design through Analogy. In Proc. Designing Interactive Systems.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marina Jirotka
    • 1
  • Rob Procter
    • 2
  • Tom Rodden
    • 3
  • Geoffrey C. Bowker
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre for Requirements and FoundationsOxford University Computing LaboratoryOxfordUK
  2. 2.Manchester UniversityManchesterUK
  3. 3.Nottingham UniversityNottinghamUK
  4. 4.Santa Clara UniversitySanta ClaraUSA

Personalised recommendations