Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 281–319 | Cite as

Developing Digital Records: Early Experiences of Record and Replay

  • Andy Crabtree
  • Andrew French
  • Chris Greenhalgh
  • Steve Benford
  • Keith Cheverst
  • Dan Fitton
  • Mark Rouncefield
  • Connor Graham
Article

Abstract

In this paper we consider the development of ‘digital records’ to support ethnographic study of interaction and collaboration in ubiquitous computing environments and articulate the core concept of ‘record and replay’ through two case studies. One focuses on the utility of digital records, or records of interaction generated by a computer system, to ethnographic inquiry and highlights the mutually supportive nature of digital records and ethnographic methods. The other focuses on the work it takes to make digital records support ethnography, particularly the work of description and representation that is required to reconcile the fragmented character of interaction in ubiquitous computing environments. The work involved in ‘making digital records work’ highlights requirements for the design of tools to support the endeavour and informs the development of a Replay Tool. This tool enables ethnographers to visualize the data content of digital records; to extract sequences of relevance to analysis and remove non-relevant features; to marry recorded content with external resources, such as video; to add content from internal and external resources through annotation; and to reorder digital records to reflect the interactional order of events rather than the recorded order of events.

Keywords

CSCW digital records ethnography e-Social Science record and replay 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson R., Sharrock W. (1993). Can Organisations Afford knowledge. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 1(3):143–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkhuus, L., M. Chalmers, P. Tennent, M. Hall, M. Bell, S. Sherwood and B. Brown (2005): Picking Pockets on the Lawn, Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Tokyo: Springer, pp. 358–374Google Scholar
  3. Benford, S., W. Seagar, M. Flintham, R. Anastasi, D. Rowland, J. Humble, D. Stanton, J.␣Bowers, N. Tandavanitj, M. Adams, J. Row Farr, A. Oldroyd and J. Sutton (2004): The Error of Our Ways: The Experience of Self-Reported Position in a Location-Based Game. Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Nottingham: Springer, pp. 70–87Google Scholar
  4. Benford, S., A. Crabtree, S. Reeves, M. Flintham and A. Drozd (2006): Designing for the Opportunities and Risks of Staging Digital Experiences in Public Settings. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal: ACM, pp. 427–536Google Scholar
  5. Benson D., Hughes J.A (1991). Method: Evidence and Inference. In: Button G. (eds). Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 109–136Google Scholar
  6. Blomberg, J.L., L. Suchman and R. Trigg (1996): Reflections on a Work-Oriented Design Project. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 11, 237–265Google Scholar
  7. Blomberg, J.L., L. Suchman and R. Trigg (1997): Back to Work: Renewing Old Agendas for Cooperative Design. In M. Kyng and L. Mathiassen (eds.): Computers and Design in Context, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 267–287Google Scholar
  8. Brown, B., I. MacColl, M. Chalmers, A. Galani, C. Randell and A. Steed (2003): Lessons from the Lighthouse. Proceedings of the 2003 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Florida: ACM Press, pp. 577–585Google Scholar
  9. Button, G. (1992): The Curious Case of the Vanishing Technology. In G. Button (ed.): Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology. London: Routledge, pp. 10–28Google Scholar
  10. Cheverst, K., K. Clarke, D. Fitton, M. Rouncefield, A. Crabtree and T. Hemmings (2003a)L: SPAM on the Menu: The Practical Use of Remote Messaging in Community Care. Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Conference on Universal Usability, Vancouver, Canada: ACM Press, pp. 23–29Google Scholar
  11. Cheverst, K., A. Dix, D. Fitton and M. Rouncefield (2003b): Out to Lunch’-Exploring the Sharing of Personal Context Through Office Door Displays. Proceedings of OZCHI 2003, Brisbane, Australia: Ergonomics Society of Australia, pp. 74–83Google Scholar
  12. Crabtree A., O’Brien J., Nichols D., Rouncefield M., Twidale M. (2000). Ethnomethodologically Informed Ethnography and Information Systems Design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(7):666–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crabtree A. (2003) Designing Collaborative Systems: A Practical Guide to Ethnography. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Crabtree A. (2004). Taking Technomethodology Seriously: Hybrid Change in the Ethnomethodology–Design Relationship. European Journal of Information Systems 13:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crabtree, A., S. Benford, T. Rodden, C. Greenhalgh, M. Flintham, R. Anastasi, A. Drozd, M.␣Adams, J. Row-Farr, N. Tandavanitj and A. Steed (2004): Orchestrating a Mixed Reality Game ‘on the Ground’. Proceedings of the 2004 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vienna: ACM Press, pp. 391–398Google Scholar
  16. Crabtree, A., T. Rodden and S. Benford (2005): Moving with the Times: IT Research and the Boundaries of CSCW. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 217–251Google Scholar
  17. Crabtree A. and M. Rouncefield (2005): Working with Text Logs: Some Early Experiences of e-social Science in the Field. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on e-Social Science, June 22–24, Manchester: ESRC. http://www.ncess.ac.uk/events/conference/programme/papers/ncess2005_paper_Crabtree.pdf
  18. Crabtree, A., S. Benford, C. Greenhalgh, A. French, M. Chalmers, B. Brown and P. Tennent (2006a): Supporting ethnographic studies of computing ‘in the wild”, to appear Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, June 26–28, Montreal: ACMGoogle Scholar
  19. Crabtree, A., A. French, C. Greenhalgh, T. Rodden and S. Benford (2006b) Working with Digital Records: Developing Tool Support. to appear Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on e-Social Science, June 28–30, Manchester: ESRCGoogle Scholar
  20. Erickson T., Kellogg W. (2000). Social Translucence – An Approach to Designing Systems that Support Social Processes. ACM Transactions in Computer–Human Interaction 7:59–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flintham, M., R. Anastasi, S. Benford, T. Hemmings, A. Crabtree, C. Greenhalgh, T.␣Rodden, N. Tandavanitj, M. Adams and J. Row-Farr (2003): Where On-Line Meets On-the-Streets: Experiences with Mobile Mixed Reality Games. Proceedings of the 2003 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florida: ACM Press, pp. 569–576Google Scholar
  22. Foster I., Kesselman C., Tuecke S. (2001). The Anatomy of the Grid: Enabling Scalable Virtual Organizations. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 15(3):200–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garfinkel H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaver W.H., Dunne A., Pacenti E. (1999). Design: Cultural Probes. Interactions 6(1):21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham, C., K. Cheverst and M. Rouncefield (2005): Technologies for the Humdrum: Trajectories, Interactional Needs and a Care Setting. Proceedings of OZCHI 2005, Canberra: Ergonomics Society of Australia, pp. 21–25Google Scholar
  26. Heath, C.C., M. Jirotka, P. Luff and J. Hindmarsh (1994): Unpacking Collaboration: the Interactional Organisation of Trading in a City Dealing Room. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 147–165Google Scholar
  27. Heath, C. and J. Hindmarsh (2002): Analyzing interaction: video, ethnography and situated conduct. In T. May (ed.): Qualitative Research in Action. London: Sage, pp. 99–121Google Scholar
  28. Hine C. (1998). Virtual Ethnography. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Hughes J., Sharrock W. (1997). The Philosophy of Social Research, 3rd edn. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughes, J., T. Rodden, J. O’Brien, M. Rouncefield and S. Blythin (1997): Designing with␣Ethnography: A Presentation Framework for Design. Proceedings of the 1997 ACM␣Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, Amsterdam: ACM Press, pp. 147–158Google Scholar
  31. Hutchinson, H., W. Mackay, B. Westerlund, B.B. Bederson, A. Druin, C. Plaisant, M.␣Beaudouin-Lafon, S. Conversy, H. Evans, H. Hansen, N. Roussel, B. Eiderbäck (2003): Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families. Proceedings of the 2003 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florida: ACM Press, pp. 17–24Google Scholar
  32. Intille, S., E.M. Tapia, J. Rondoni, J. Beaudin, C. Kukla, S. Agarwal, L. Bao and K. Larson (2003): Tools for Studying Behavior and Technology in Natural Settings. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Seattle: Springer.•, pp. 157–174Google Scholar
  33. Ivory M., Hearst M. (2001). The State of the Art in Automating Usability Evaluation. ACM Computing Surveys 33(4):470–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kort, J. and H. de Poot (2005): Usage Analysis: Combining Logging and Qualitative Methods. Proceedings of the 2005 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Extended Abstracts), Vienna: ACM Press, pp. 2121–2122Google Scholar
  35. Lynch M. (2000). Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge. Theory, Culture, and Society 17:27–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nardi, B., S. Whittaker and E. Bradner (2000): Interaction and Outeraction: Instant Messaging in Action. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Philadelphia: ACM Press, pp. 79–88Google Scholar
  37. Park R.E., Burgess E.W., McKenzie R.D. (1925). The City. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  38. Plummer K (1983). Documents of Life: An Introduction to the Problems and Literature of a Humanistic Method. Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Prosser J. (eds). (1998). Image Based Research: A Sourcebook for Qualitative Researchers. Falmer Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Rouncefield, M., A. Crabtree, T. Hemmings, T. Rodden, K. Cheverst, K. Clarke, G.␣Dewsbury and J. Hughes (2003): Designing with Care: Adapting Cultural Probes to Inform Design in Sensitive Settings. Proceedings of OZCHI 2003. Brisbane, Australia: Ergonomics Society of Australia, pp. 4–13Google Scholar
  41. Ruhleder, K. and B. Jordan (1997): Capturing Complex, Distributed Activities: Video-based Interaction Analysis as a Component of Workplace Ethnography. Proc. Information Systems and Qualitative Research, IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 International Conference, Philadelphia: Chapman & Hall, pp. 246–275Google Scholar
  42. Sacks H., Schegloff E., Jefferson G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation. Language 50:696–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sacks H. (1992). A Single Instance of a Phone-Call Opening. In: Jefferson G. (eds). Lectures on Conversation Volume II. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 542–553Google Scholar
  44. Schmidt K., Bannon L. (1992). Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 1(1):7–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sharrock W., Button G. (1991). The Social Actor: Social Action in Real Time. In: Button G. (eds). Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 137–175Google Scholar
  46. Strauss A. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CambridgeshireGoogle Scholar
  47. Suchman L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Tapia, E.M., S. Intille and K. Larson (2004): Activity Recognition in the Home Setting Using Simple and Ubiquitous Sensors. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Linz: Springer, pp. 158–175Google Scholar
  49. Wieder D., Zimmerman D. (1977). The Diary: Diary Interview Methods. Urban Life 5(4):479–498Google Scholar
  50. Woodruff, A., M. Szymanski, R. Grinter and P. Aoki (2002): Practical strategies for integrating a conversation analyst in an iterative design process. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, London: ACM Press, pp. 255–264Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andy Crabtree
    • 1
  • Andrew French
    • 1
  • Chris Greenhalgh
    • 1
  • Steve Benford
    • 1
  • Keith Cheverst
    • 2
  • Dan Fitton
    • 2
  • Mark Rouncefield
    • 2
  • Connor Graham
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Computer Science & ITUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Computing DepartmentLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  3. 3.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of MelbourneCarltonAustralia

Personalised recommendations