Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 321–358 | Cite as

Enriching the Notion of Data Curation in E-Science: Data Managing and Information Infrastructuring in the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network

  • Helena KarastiEmail author
  • Karen S. Baker
  • Eija Halkola


This paper aims to enrich the current understanding of data curation prevalent in e-Science by drawing on an ethnographic study of one of the longest-running efforts at long-term consistent data collection with open data sharing in an environment of interdisciplinary collaboration. In such a context we identify a set of salient characteristics of ecological research and data that shape the data stewardship approach of the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) network. We describe the actual practices through which LTER information managers attend to the extended temporal scale of long-term research and data sets both through data care work and information infrastructure development. We discuss the issues of long-term and continuity that represent central challenges for data curation and stewardship. We argue for more efforts to be directed to understanding what is at stake with a long-term perspective and differing temporal scales as well as to studying actual practices of data curation and stewardship in order to provide more coherent understandings of e-Science solutions and technologies.


cyberinfrastructure data stewardship information management ecology long-term perspective scientific collaboration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work is partially supported by an NSF/SBE/SES Human Social Dynamics grant #04-33369. The work is conducted in collaboration with the LTER community (NSF/OCE #04-17616, NSF/OPP #02-17282 and #04-05069). The fieldwork was conducted in 2002, and we offer our special thanks to Geoffrey C. Bowker for collaboration in the BDEI project (NSF/DGO #EIA-01-31958). Furthermore, we thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.


  1. Ackerman M.S., Halverson C. (2004). Organizational Memory as Objects, Processes, and Trajectories: An Examination of Organizational Memory in Use. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), The Journal of Collaborative Computing 13(2):155–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arzberger, P., P. Scroeder, A. Beaulieu, G. Bowker, K. Casey, L. Laaksonen, D. Moorman, P. Uhlir and P. Wouters (2003): Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic and Social Development, OECD Follow Up Group on Issues of Access to Publicly Funded Research Data, Final Report. Available: Final_Report_2003.pdf [Last referenced: 23.05.2006]
  3. Atkins, D.E., K.K. Droegemeier, S.I. Feldman, H. Garcia-Molina, M.L. Klein, D.G. Messerschmitt, P. Messina, J.P. Ostriker and M.H. Wright (2003): Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure, Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure [Web-document]. Available: [Last referenced: 23.05.2006]
  4. Baker K.S., Benson B.J., Henshaw D.L., Blodgett D., Porter J.H., Stafford S.G. (2000). Evolution of a Multisite Network Information System: The LTER Information Management Paradigm. BioScience 50(11):963–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, K.S., D. Ribes, F. Millerand and G.C. Bowker (2005): Interoperability Strategies for Scientific Cyberinfrastruture: Research and Practice. American Society for Information Systems and Technology. In 05ASIST. American Society of Information Science and Technology, Proceedings Bringing Research and Practice Together, Charlotte, North Carolina, October 28 to November 02, 2005 Google Scholar
  6. Bertelsen O.W., Bødker S. (2001). Cooperation in Massively Distributed Information Spaces. In: Prinz W., Jarke M., Rogers Y., Schmidt K., Wulf V. (eds), ECSCW. Seventh European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, September 16 to 20, 2001. Bonn, Germany, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1–17Google Scholar
  7. Birnholtz, J.P. and M.J. Bietz (2003): Data at Work: Supporting Sharing in Science and Engineering. In M. Tremaine (ed.): GROUP’03. Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, 2003 November 9 to 12, 2003. ACM Press, pp. 339–348Google Scholar
  8. Bowker G.C. (2000). Biodiversity Datadiversity. Social Studies of Science 30(5):643–683Google Scholar
  9. Brand S. (1994). How Buildings Learn. What Happens After They’re Built. New York, Viking, pp. 243Google Scholar
  10. Buneman, P., L. Lyon and C. Rusbridge (2005): Comments from the Digital Curation Centre on Long-Lived Digital Data Collections: Enabling Research and Education in the 21st Century, a draft report of the National Science Board. Available: [Last referenced: 23.05.2006]
  11. Callahan J.T. (1984). Long-Term Ecological Research. BioScience 34(6):363–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CCSDS 650.0-B-1 (2002): Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). Washington, DC, USA: National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  13. Chervenak A, Foster I., Kesselman C., Salisbury C., Tuecke S. (1999). The Data Grid: Towards an Architecture for the Distributed Management and Analysis of Large Scientific Datasets. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 23(3):187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chin, G. Jr. and C.S. Lansing (2004): Capturing and Supporting Contexts for Scientific Data Sharing via the Biological Sciences Collaboratory. In CSCW’04. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, November 6 to 10, 2004. Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp. 409–418Google Scholar
  15. Christiansen E. (1997). Gardening: A Metaphor for Sustainability in Information Technology-Technical Support. In: Berleur J., Whitehouse D. (eds), An Ethical Global Information Society: Culture and Democracy Revisited. London, Chapman & HallGoogle Scholar
  16. Dittrich, Y., S. Eriksén and C. Hansson (2002): PD in the Wild: Evolving Practices of Design in Use. In T. Binder, J. Gregory and I. Wagner (eds.): PDC’02. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Malmö, Sweden, June 23 to 25, 2002. Palo Alto, CA: CPSR, pp. 124–134Google Scholar
  17. Driscoll C.T., Lawrence G.B., Bulger A.J., Butler T.J., Cronan C.S., Eagar C., Lambert K.F., Likens G.E., Stoddard J.L., Weathers K.C. (2001). Acidic Deposition in The Northeastern United States: Sources and Inputs, Ecosystem Effects, and Management Strategies. BioScience 51:180–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finholt T.A., Olson G.M. (1997). From Laboratories to Collaboratories: A New Organizational Form for Scientific Collaboration. Psychological Science 8(1):28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisher G., Ostwald J. (2002). Seeding, Evolutionary Growth, and Reseeding: Enriching Participatory Design with Informed Participation. In: Binder T., Gregory J., Wagner I. (eds), PDC’02. Participatory Design Conference, Malmö, Sweden, June 23–25, 2002. Palo Alto, CA, CPSR, pp. 135–143Google Scholar
  20. Fischer G., Giaccardi E., Ye Y., Sutcliffe A.G., Mehandjiev N. (2004). Meta-design: A manifesto for End-User Development. Communications of the ACM 47(9):33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franklin M., Halevy A., Maier D. (2005). From Databases to Dataspaces: A New Abstraction for Information Management. SIGMOD Record 34(4):27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gray J., Liu D.T., Nieto-Santisteban M., Szalay A., DeWitt D.J., Heber G. (2005). Scientific Data Management in the Coming Decade. SIGMOD Record 34(4):34–41zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenbaum J.M., Kyng M. (1991). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  24. Greif I., Sarin S. (1987). Data Sharing in Group Work. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 5(2):187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grimm N.B., Redman C.L. (2004). Approaches to The Study of Urban Ecosystems: The Case of Central Arizona-Phoenix. Urban Ecosystems 7:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gross, K.L., C.E. Pake, E. Allen, C. Bledsoe, R. Colwell, P. Dayton, M. Dethier, J. Helly, R. Holt, N. Morin, W. Michener, S.T. A. Pickett and S. Stafford (1995): Final Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Future of Long-term Ecological Data (FLED), Volume I: Text of the Report. Washington, DC: The Ecological Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanseth O., Monteiro E., Hatling M. (1996). Developing Information Infrastructure: The Tension between Standardisation and Flexibility. Science, Technology, & Human Values 21(4):407–426Google Scholar
  28. Harmon M.E., Nadelhoffer K.J., Blair J.M. (1999). Measuring Decomposition, Nutrient Turnover, and Stores in Plant Litter. In: Robertson G.P., Bledsoe C.S., Coleman D.C., Sollins P. (eds), Standard Soil Methods for Long Term Ecological Research. New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 202–240Google Scholar
  29. Hayden B.P. (2000). Climate Change and Exratropical Storminess in the United States: An Assessment. Journal of American Water Resources Association 35(6):1387–1397ADSGoogle Scholar
  30. Hedstrom, M. (2003): It’s About Time: Research Challenges in Digital Archiving and Long-term Preservation, Final Report. Workshop on Research Challenges in Digital Archiving and Long-term Preservation, April 12 to 13, 2002. Sponsored by the National Science Foundation and The Library of CongressGoogle Scholar
  31. Helly J.J., Todd Elvins T., Sutton D., Martinez D., Miller S.E., Pickett S., Ellison A.M. (2002). Controlled Publication of Digital Scientific Data. Communications of the ACM 45(5):97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henderson A., Kyng M. (1991). There’s No Place like Home: Continuing Design in Use. In: Greenbaum J., Kyng M. (eds), Design at Work. London, New Jersey, Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  33. Hey, T. and A.E. Trefethen (2003): The Data Deluge: An e-Science Perspective. In F. Berman, G. Fox and T. Hey (eds.): Wiley Grid Computing: Making the Global Infrastructure a reality. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 809–824Google Scholar
  34. Hilgartner S. (1995). Biomolecular Databases: New Communication Regimes for Biology? Science Communication 17(2):240–263Google Scholar
  35. Hobbie J.E., Carpenter S.R., Grimm N.B., Gosz J.R., Seastedt T.R. (2003). The US Long Term Ecological Research Program. BioScience 53(1):21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hodge, G. and E. Frangakis (2004): Digital Preservation and Permanent Access to Scientific Information: The State of the Practice (CENDI/04–3), The International Council for Scientific and Technical Information (ICSTI) and CENDI (U.S. Federal Information Managers Group). February 2004, Revised April 2004. Available: [Last referenced: 23.05.2006]
  37. Jirotka M., Procter R., Hartswood M., Slack R., Simpson A., Coopmans C., Hinds C., Voss A. (2005). Collaboration and Trust in Healthcare Innovation: The eDiaMoND Case Study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), The Journal of Collaborative Computing 14(4):369–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johansen R. (1988). Groupware. Computer Support for Business Teams. New York, The Free PressGoogle Scholar
  39. Kanstrup, A.M. (2005): Local Design: An Inquiry into Work Practices of Local IT Supporters. PhD theses. Department of Communication, Aalborg University, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaplan, S. and L. Seeback (2001): Harnessing Complexity. In ECSCW. Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, September 16 to 20, 2001, Bonn, Germany. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 359–397Google Scholar
  41. Karasti, H. and K.S. Baker (2004): Infrastructuring for the Long-Term: Ecological Information Management. In HICSS’3. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2004, Hawaii, USA, January 5 to 8, 2004Google Scholar
  42. Karasti, H. and A.-L. Syrjänen (2004): Artful Infrastructuring in Two Cases of Community PD. In PDC 04. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful integration: interweaving Media, Materials and Practices, Volume 1, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, July 27 to 31, 2004. New York: ACM Press, pp. 20–30Google Scholar
  43. Lamb R., Davidson E. (2005). Information and Communication Technology Challenges to Scientific Professional Identity. The Information Society 21(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lave J., Wenger E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  45. Likens G.E. (1989). Long-Term Studies in Ecology: Approaches and Alternatives. New York, Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  46. Lord, P. and A. Macdonald (2003): e-Science Curation Report-Data Curation for e-Science in the UK: An Audit to Establish Requirements for Future Curation and Provision. Prepared for the JISC Committee for the Support of Research (JCSR). Twickenham, UK, The Digital Archiving Consultancy Limited. Available: e-ScienceReportFinal.pdf [Last referenced: 23.05.2006]
  47. Lord, P., A. Macdonald, L. Lyon and D. Giarretta (2004): From Data Deluge to Data Curation. In Proceedings of the UK e-science All Hands meeting 2004, pp. 371–375Google Scholar
  48. Magnuson J.J. (1990). Long-Term Ecological Research and the Invisible Present. BioScience 40(7):495–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Magnuson J.J., Rogbertson D.M., Benson B.J., Wynne R.H., Livingsone D.M., Arai T., Assel R.A., Barry R.G., Card V., Kuusisto E., Granin N.G., Prowse T.D., Stewart K.M., Vuglinski V.S. (2000). Historical Trends in Lake and River Ice Cover in The Northern Hemisphere. Science 289:1743–1746PubMedCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  50. Markus L.M. (2001). Toward a Theory of Knowledge Reuse: Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(1):57–93MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  51. Michener W.K. (2006). Meta-Information Concepts for Ecological Data Management. Ecological Informatics 1:3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Michener W.K., Brunt J.W., Helly J.J., Kirchner T.B., Stafford S.G. (1997). Nongeospatial Metadata for the Ecological Sciences. Ecological Applications 7(1):330–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. National Science Board (2005): Long Lived Digital Data Collections: Enabling Research and Education in the 21st Century, National Science Board (NSB-05-40, Revised May 23, 2005). Available: [Last referenced: 23.05.2006]
  54. Newman H.B., Ellisman M.H., Orcutt J.A. (2003). Data-Intensive e-Science Frontier Research. Communications of the ACM 46(11):68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. OECD Global Science Forum (2005): Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Global Science Forum Report on Grids and Basic Research Programmes. Final consensus report from the OECD Global Science Forum Workshop, Sydney, Australia, September 25–27, 2005Google Scholar
  56. O’Day, V.L., A. Adler, A. Kuchinsky and A. Bouch (2001): When Worlds Collide: Molecular Biology as Interdisciplinary Collaboration. In W. Prinz, M. Jarke, Y. Rogers, K. Schmidt and V. Wulf (eds.): ECSCW. Seventh European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, September 16 to 20, 2001, Bonn, Germany. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 399–418Google Scholar
  57. Pickett S.T.A., Burch W.R., Grove J.M. (1999). Interdisciplinary Research: Maintaining the Constructive Impulse in a Culture of Criticism. Ecosystems 2:302–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pipek, V. (2005): From Tailoring to Appropriation Support: Negotiating Groupware Usage. Doctoral thesis. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, Series A, Scientiae rerum naturalium nro 430. Oulu 2005Google Scholar
  59. Rolland K.H., Monteiro E. (2002). Balancing the Local and the Global in Infrastructural Information Systems. The Information Society 18:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rolland, K.H., V. Hepsø and E. Monteiro (2006): (Re)Conceptualizing Common Information Spaces across Heterogeneous Contexts: Im/Mutable Mobiles and Imperfection. Accepted for CSCW’06. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Google Scholar
  61. Sandusky R.J. (2003). Infrastructure Management as Cooperative Work: Implications for Systems Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), The Journal of Collaborative Computing 12:97–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schmidt K., Bannon L. (1992). Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), The Journal of Collaborative Computing 1(1–2):7–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schuler D., Namioka A. (eds) (1993). Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  64. Sonnenwald, D.H. (2003): Expectations for a Scientific Collaboratory: A Case Study. In GROUP ‘03. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work 2003. November 9 to 12, 2003. Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, pp.68–74Google Scholar
  65. Star S.L., Bowker G.C. (2002). How to Infrastructure. In Lievrouw L.A., Livingstone S. (eds), Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs. London, SAGE Publications, pp. 151–162Google Scholar
  66. Star S.L., Griesemer J.R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19:387–420Google Scholar
  67. Star S.L., Ruhleder K. (1996). Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information Systems Research 7:111–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Star S.L., Strauss A. (1999). Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), The Journal of Collaborative Computing 8(1–2):9–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sterling, T.D. and J.J. Weinkam (1990): Sharing Scientific Data. Communications of the ACM, ACM Press, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 112–119Google Scholar
  70. Strauss A.L. (1975). Chronic Illness and the Quality of Life. Saint Louis, The C. V. Mosby CompanyGoogle Scholar
  71. Strauss A.L., Fagerhaugh S., Suczek B., Wiener C. (1985). Social Organization of Medical Work. Chicago, University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  72. Suchman L. (1995): Special Issue: Representations of Work. Communications of the ACM 38(9):33–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Suchman, L. (2000): Located Accountabilities in Technology Production. Work-in-progress, revision of (Suchman, 1994), presented at the Sawyer Seminar on Heterarchies, Santa Fe Institute, October 2000 Google Scholar
  74. Suchman L., Blomberg J.e, Orr J.E., Trigg R. (1999). Reconstructing Technologies as Social Practice. American Behavioral Scientist 43(3):392–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. UK Research Council e-Science definition (2001): Available: [Last referenced: 23.05.2006]Google Scholar
  76. Van House, N.A., M.H. Butler and L.R. Schiff (1998): Cooperative Knowledge Work and Practices of Trust: Sharing Environmental Planning Data Sets. In CSCW ‘98. Proceedings of the ACM Conference On Computer Supported Cooperative Work, November 14 to 18, 1998. Seattle, WA: ACM, pp. 335–343Google Scholar
  77. Waide R.B., Willig M.R., Steiner C.F., Mittelbach G., Gough L., Dodson S.I., Juday G.P., Parmenter R. (1999). The Relationship between Productivity and Species Richness. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30:257–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zimmerman, A.S. (2003): Data Sharing and Secondary Use of Scientific Data: Experiences of ecologists. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information Processing ScienceUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations