Documentarisation Processes in Documents for Action (DofA): The Status of Annotations and Associated Cooperation Technologies

Article

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on situations where documents serve to coordinate the work of a distributed collective engaged in common goal-directed activities. After defining the concept of semiotic products as resulting from symbolic communicational transactions, we present some coordination strategies which can be used to compensate for the spatio-socio-temporal distribution typical of these transactions. Among these strategies, it is proposed to study in detail the documentarisation strategy, which makes the material substrate mediating the transactions relatively durable and endows it with attributes making its further use possible. In our study of documentarisation processes, several novel concepts are introduced and used to describe Documents for Action (DofA), their characteristics and the conditions that should be respected for correctly annotating them.

Key words

document Document for Action (DofA) documentarisation annotation cooperative writing newsgroup 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berneers Lee, T., J. Hendler and O. Lassila (2001): The Semantic Web, Scientific American, May 2001, http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00048144-10D2-1C70-84A9809-EC588EF21Google Scholar
  2. Briet S. (1951) Qu’est-ce que la documentation? EDIT, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. Bringay, S., C. Barry and J. Charlet (2004): The Health Record: Kernel of a Medical Memory, ECAI’2004 Workshop on Knowledge Management and Organizational Memories, August 22–27, Valencia (Spain), pp. 18–32Google Scholar
  4. Brown J.S., Duguid P. (1995) The Social Life of Documents. In: Dyson, E. (eds) The Social Life of Documents. EDventure Holdings Inc., New York, pp. 1–18Google Scholar
  5. Buckland M.K. (1997) What is a “document”? Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48(9):804–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cahier J.-P., Zacklad M. (2002) Towards a Knowledge-Based Marketplace model (KBM) for cooperation between agents. In: Blay-Fornarino M., Pinna-Dery A., Schmidt K., Zaraté P. (eds) Cooperative System Design. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 226–238Google Scholar
  7. Cahier, J.P. M. Zacklad and A. Monceaux (2004): Une application du Web socio-sémantique à la définition d’un annuaire métier en ingénierie, Actes des journées Ingénierie des Connaissances 2004, Mai 2004, LyonGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark H.H. (1996) Using Language. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Dourish, P. and V. Bellotti (1992): Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces, in Proceedings of the CSCW’92 Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  10. Grice P. (1979) Logique et conversation. Communications 30:57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heath C., Luff P. (1992) Collaboration and Control: Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms. CSCW Journal 1(1):69–94Google Scholar
  12. Kerbrat-Orecchioni C. (1996) La Conversation. Le Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewkowicz M., Marccocia M. (2004) The participative framework as a design model for newsgroups: PartRoOM. In: Darses F., Dieng R., Simone C., Zacklad M. (eds) Cooperative Systems Design. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 243–257Google Scholar
  14. Lewis D.K. (1969) Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Pédauque, R.T. (2003): Document: forme, signe et médium, les re-formulations du numérique. (Working paper) http://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic_00000511.htmlGoogle Scholar
  16. Sack, W., F. Détienne, N. Ducheneaut, J.-M. Burkhardt, D. Mahendran and F. Barcellini (2006): A Methodological Framework for Socio-Cognitive Analyses of Collaborative Design of Open Source Software. CSCW Journal, (this issue)Google Scholar
  17. Ripoche, G. and J.-P. Sansonnet (2006): Experiences in Automating the Analysis of Linguistic Interactions for the Study of Distributed Collectives. CSCW Journal, (this issue)Google Scholar
  18. Schmidt K., Simone C. (1996) Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. CSCW Journal 5(2–3): 155–200Google Scholar
  19. Zacklad, M. (2000): La théorie des Transactions Intellectuelles : une approche gestionnaire et␣cognitive pour le traitement du COS, Intellectica 2000/1, 30:195–222Google Scholar
  20. Zacklad, M. (2003a): Communities of Action: a Cognitive and Social Approach to the Design of CSCW Systems, Proceedings of GROUP’2003, Sanibel Island, Florida: ACM Press, pp.␣190–197Google Scholar
  21. Zacklad M., Lewkowicz M., Boujut J.-F., Darses F., Détienne F. (2003) Formes et gestion des annotations numériques collectives en ingénierie collaborative. In: Dieng-Kuntz R. (eds) Actes des 14èmes journées francophones d’Ingénierie des Connaissances. Laval, France, pp. 207–224Google Scholar
  22. Zacklad, M. (2004): Processus de documentarisation dans les Documents pour l’Action (DopA) : statut des annotations et technologies de la coopération associées. In Le numérique : Impact sur le cycle de vie du document pour une analyse interdisciplinaire, pp.␣13–15 Octobre 2004, Montréal. Montréal: 19 p. from : http://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic_00001072.htmlGoogle Scholar
  23. Zacklad, M. (2005a): Transactions communicationnelles symboliques et communauté d’action: une approche de la création de valeur dans les processus coopératifs, à paraître in Connaissance, Activité, Organisation, P. Lorino et R. Teulier, Eds, Paris: Maspéro.Google Scholar
  24. Zacklad, M. (2005b): Introduction aux ontologies sémiotiques dans le Web Socio Sémantique. In Jaulent, M.-C. 16èmes journées francophones d’Ingénierie des Connaissances, 1–3 Avril 2005, Nice, from: http://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic_00001479.html Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UTT, CNRS-Charles Delaunay Institute/Tech-CICO Lab.TROYES CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations