How Much Is Data Privacy Worth? A Preliminary Investigation
Do consumers value data privacy? How much? In a survey of 2,416 Americans, we find that the median consumer is willing to pay just $5 per month to maintain data privacy (along specified dimensions), but would demand $80 to allow access to personal data. This is a “superendowment effect,” much higher than the 1:2 ratio often found between willingness to pay and willingness to accept. In addition, people demand significantly more money to allow access to personal data when primed that such data includes health-related data than when primed that such data includes demographic data. We analyze reasons for these disparities and offer some notations on their implications for theory and practice. A general theme is that because of a lack of information and behavioural biases, both willingness to pay and willingness to accept measures are highly unreliable guides to the welfare effects of retaining or giving up data privacy. Gertrude Stein’s comment about Oakland, California may hold for consumer valuations of data privacy: “There is no there there.” For guidance, policymakers should give little or no attention to either of those conventional measures of economic value, at least when steps are not taken to overcome deficits in information and behavioural biases.
KeywordsData privacy Endowment effect Willingness to pay Willingness to accept Behavioural biases
- Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2018). The welfare effects of social media. SSRN Electronic Journal. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3308640. Accessed 18 April 2019.
- Bewley, T. F. (1999). Why wages don’t fall during a recession. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Cummings, R. G., Brookshire, D. S., Schulze, W. D., Bishop, R. C., & Arrow, K. J. (1986). Valuing environmental goods: An assessment of the contingent valuation method. Totowa, N.J: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Scholar
- Sharot, T. (2012). The optimism bias: A tour of the irrationally positive brain. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Spiekermann, S., Grossklags, J., & Berendt, B. (2001). E-privacy in 2nd generation E-commerce: Privacy preferences versus actual behavior. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce - EC ’01 (pp. 38–47). Presented at the the 3rd ACM conference, Tampa, FL: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Stein, G. (1937). Everybody’s autobiography. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Sunstein, C. R. (2002). Probability neglect: Emotions, worst cases, and law. The Yale Law Journal, 112(1), 61.Google Scholar
- Sunstein, C. R. (2019). Valuing Facebook. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–12. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.34 Accessed 18 April 2019.