Ambiguity and Consumer Perceptions of Risk in Various Areas of Biotechnology
Certain advances in biotechnology generate controversy, with consumer resistance derived from publicly expressed concerns about safety, despite scientific evidence of safety. The reasons for this discrepancy are not fully understood. This study aimed to understand how participants respond to biotechnology when some ambiguity about risk or uncertainty is presented. A sample of 318 adults completed a survey assessing aversion to ambiguous information in controversial areas such as food, vaccines, fluoridated water, and stem cell research. Participants responded to ambiguity assessments and 14 scenarios in these categories that contained a description of a benefit and either missing or conflicting information about an unknown risk or uncertainty. Participants who reported greater aversion to ambiguity tended to respond in a way that signals the assignment of high risk, and low benefit, when presented with some unknown or uncertain risk. The results of the present study can be used to develop methods to close the divide.
KeywordsConsumer Decision-making Ambiguity Biotechnology Survey
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2012). Statement by the AAAS board of directors on labeling of genetically modified foods. Retrieved from http://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/migrate/uploads/AAAS_GM_statement.pdf.
- American Cancer Society. (2014). Recombinant bovine growth hormone. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/othercarcinogens/athome/recombinant-bovine-growth-hormone.
- Brown, J.G. (2015, June 30). [Letter from Jerry Brown, Governor, State of California, to Members of California State Senate]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.ca.gov/docs/SB_277_Signing_Message.pdf.
- Cavatorta, E., & Schroder, D. (2016). Measuring ambiguity preferences: A new ambiguity preference module. Available at SSRN. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2659596.
- Center for Disease Control. (2015). Fluoridation basics. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/basics/.
- Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology (1986). Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology. 51 FR 23302.Google Scholar
- Fluoride Action Network. (2016). Water Fluoridation. Retrieved from http://fluoridealert.org/issues/water/.
- Funk, C., & Kennedy, B. (2016). The new food fights: U.S. public divides over food science. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/12/01/the-new-food-fights/.
- Johnson, G. (2015, August 24). The widening world of hand-picked truths. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/25/science/the-widening-world-of-hand-picked-truths.html.
- Kahan, D. M. (2010). Culture, cognition, and consent: Who perceives what, and why, in “acquaintance rape” cases. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 158, 729–813.Google Scholar
- Kahan, D., & Braman, D. (2016). Cultural cognition of public policy. Yale Journal of Law and Public Policy, 24, 147–170.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York City, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
- Los Angeles Times Editorial. (2015, June 30). California settles the vaccination question. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-vaccination-bill-signedinto-law-in-california-20150701-story.html.
- Lynas, M. (2017). Expert find climate skeptic and anti-GMO studies are scientifically flawed. Retrieved from https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/experts-find-climate-skeptic-and-anti-gmo-studies-are-scientifically-flawed.
- Main, D. (2015). Facts about fluoridation. Retrieved form http://www.livescience.com/37123-fluoridation.html.
- Moser, W. (2014). Why do affluent, well educated people refuse vaccines? Chicago Magazine.Google Scholar
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Genetically engineered crops experiences and prospects. Retrieved from https://nas-sites.org/ge-crops/.
- Rubin, E. L., & Sax, J. K. (2018). Administrative guidance and genetically modified food. Arizona Law Review., 60(3), 539–599.Google Scholar
- Saletan, W. (2015). Unhealthy fixation: The war against genetically modified organisms is full of fearmongering, errors, and fraud. Labeling them will not make you safer. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2015/07/are_gmos_safe_yes_the_case_against_them_is_full_of_fraud_lies_and_errors.html.
- Sax, J. K. (2014). The separation of politics and science. Stanford Journal of Law, Science & Policy, 7, 1–23.Google Scholar
- Sax, J. K. (2017a). Biotechnology and consumer decision-making. Seton Hall Law Review, 47(2), 433–486.Google Scholar
- Sax, J. K. (2017b). Contours of GMO regulation and labeling. Southern Methodist University Science and Technology Law Review, 19, 413–418.Google Scholar
- Slovic, P. (2004). What’s fear got to do with it? It’s affect we need to worry about. Montana Law Review, 69, 971–990.Google Scholar
- Sunstein, C. R. (2005). The availability heuristic, intuitive cost-benefit analysis, and climate change. Available at SSRN. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=844444.
- Sunstein, C. R. (2017). On mandatory labeling, with special reference to genetically modified foods. University of Pennsyvania Law Review, 156, 1043–1095.Google Scholar
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp.3-20). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2014). Report on the Food and Drug Administration’s review of the safety of recombinant bovine somatotropin. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/SafetyHealth/ProductSafetyInformation/ucm130321.htm.
- U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 21 CFR 214. Retrieved from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=314.520.