Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 397–416 | Cite as

Conflicts of Responsibility in the Globalized Textile Supply Chain. Lessons of a Tragedy

  • Pauline Barraud de LagerieEmail author


Eight years before the Rana Plaza collapse (24 April 2013), which killed over 1100 people and received huge international media coverage, a somewhat similar tragedy drew my attention: the collapse of the Spectrum Sweater Industries Ltd. factory (10 April 2005), which was responsible for the death of 64 people and led to some international mobilization. This paper describes and analyses the international career of the mobilization for the victims spurred by the tragedy. How were European consumers and citizens called upon to act? How did the European brands react? In the end, the question is how the appeal to Western firms’ “Corporate Social Responsibility” (CSR) can help improve the working conditions prevailing in Southern factories. By applying a generic definition of responsibility (the controlled administration of a sanction) and minutely examining the imputations of responsibility consecutive to the Spectrum tragedy, the paper exposes the work of activists who attempted to establish Western companies’ responsibility, and how some of the tagged companies resisted their moral obligation to protect workers beyond an employer–employee relationship stricto sensu.


Factory collapse Working conditions Corporate social responsibility Consumer activism Qualitative study 



The author wishes to thank Gabrielle Varro for her assistance in the translation of the manuscript.


  1. Barraud de Lagerie, P. (2013). The wages of sweat: A social history perspective on the fight against sweatshops. Sociologie du travail, 55(Sup. 1), e1–e23.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bender, D. E., & Greenwald, R. A. (2003). Sweatshop USA: The American sweatshop in historical and global perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Boltanski, L., Claverie, É., Offenstadt, N., & Van Damme, S. (Eds.) (2007). Affaires, scandales et grandes causes: De Socrate à Pinochet. Paris: Stock.Google Scholar
  5. Carroll, A. B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 19–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Crook, C. (2005). Survey: The good company, The Economist, 22 January.Google Scholar
  7. Daugareilh, I. (2009). La responsabilité sociale des entreprises, un projet européen en panne. Sociologie du travail, 51(4), 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Blic, D., & Lemieux, C. (2005). Le scandale comme épreuve. Éléments de sociologie pragmatique [The Scandal as Test: Elements of Pragmatic Sociology]. Politix, 71(3), 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliott, K. A., & Freeman, R. B. (2003). Can labor standards improve under globalization? Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  10. Esbenshade, J. (2004). Monitoring sweatshops. Workers, consumers, and the global apparel industry. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  11. European Commission. (2001), Green paper: Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility, COM (2001) 366 final.Google Scholar
  12. Fauconnet, P. ([1920] 1928). La responsabilité. Étude de sociologie. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
  13. Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L. & Sarat, A. (1980–1981). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming. Law & Society Review, 15(3/4), 631–654.Google Scholar
  14. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Klein, N. (2000). No logo. Taking aim at the brand bullies. Toronto: Vintage Canada.Google Scholar
  16. Lemieux, C. (2007). L’accusation tolérante. Remarques sur les rapports entre commérage, scandale et affaire. In L. Boltanski, É. Claverie, N. Offenstadt, & S. Van Damme (Eds.), Affaires, scandales et grandes causes: de Socrate à Pinochet (pp. 367–394). Paris: Stock.Google Scholar
  17. Locke, R. M. (2013). The Promise and limits of private power. Promoting labor standards in a global economy. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lund-Thomsen, P., & Lindgreen, A. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in global value chains: where are we now and where are we going? Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 11–22Google Scholar
  19. Mandle, J. R. (2000). The student anti-sweatshop movement: Limits and potential. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 570, 92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Melé, D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility theories. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 47–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Micheletti, M. (2003). Political virtue and shopping: Individuals, consumerism and collective action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Micheletti, M., & Stolle, D. (2007). Mobilizing consumers to take responsibility for global social justice. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Micheletti, M., & Stolle, D. (2008). Fashioning social justice through political consumerism, capitalism, and the internet. Cultural Studies, 22(5), 749–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Micheletti, M., Follesdal, A., & Stolle, D. (2003). Politics, products, and markets. Exploring political consumerism past and present. New Brunswick (USA) and London (UK): Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Miller, D. (2012). Last nightshift in Savar. The story of the spectrum sweater factory collapse. Alnwick (UK): McNidder & Grace.Google Scholar
  26. Pellizzoni, L. (2004). Responsibility and environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 541–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ross, A. (Ed.). (1997). No sweat. Fashion, free trade and the rights of garment workers. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  28. Shaw, L. (1997). The labor behind the label: Clean clothes campaigns in Europe. In A. Ross (Ed.), No sweat. Fashion, free trade and the rights of garment workers (pp. 215–220). New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  29. Sobczak, A. (2004). La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise: Menace ou opportunité pour le droit du travail ? Relations industrielles/Industrial relations, 59(1), 26–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thompson, D. (2008). À la recherche d’une responsabilité du contrôle. Revue française de science politique, 58(6), 933–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: the potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  33. Weissbrodt, D., & Kruger, M. (2003). Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights. American Journal of International Law, 97(4), 901–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zelizer, V. A. (1994). The social meaning of money. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IRISSO, Paris-DauphinePSL Research UniversityParis Cedex 16France

Personalised recommendations