Adler, J., Hensler, D., & Nelson, C. (1983). Simple justice: How litigants fare in the Pittsburgh court arbitration programme. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Alleweldt, F. (2011). Cross-border alternative dispute resolution in the European Union. European Commission
Alleweldt, F., Fielder, A., Alleweldt, R., Kara, S., Buccino, S., Dor?, M.-P. (2009). Study on the use of alternative dispute resolution in the European Union. Brussels: Civic Consulting.
Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power
. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Berlin, C. (2013). Verbraucher-ADR: Freiwilligkeit der Teilnahme und Verbindlichkeit des Ergebnisses im Lichte der AS-Richtlinie. Zeitschrift für Konfliktmanagmenet (ZKM) 4/2013, 108 ff.
Berlin, C. (2014). Alternative Streitbeilegung in Verbraucherkonflikten (CDR). In J. Klowait & U. Gl?ßer (Eds.), Mediationsgesetz Handkommentar (pp. 608–625). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Blumoff, R., & Tyler, T. (2008). Procedural justice in negotiation: Procedural fairness, outcome acceptance and integrative potential. Law & Society Inquiry, 33(2), 473–500.
Bone, R. (1993). Statistical adjudication: Rights, justice and utility in a world of process scarcity. Vanderbilt Law Review, 46, 561.
Buck, T., Kirkham, R., & Thompson, B. (2010). The ombudsman enterprise and administrative justice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Casper, J., Tyler, T., & Fisher, B. (1988). Procedural justice among felony defendants. Law & Society Review, 22
(3), 483–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craigforth Consultancy. (2004). Otelo office of the telecommunications ombudsman report on customer satisfaction
; available at: http://www.ombudsman-services.org/downloads/CustomerSatisfactionSurvey2004.pdf
Craigforth Consultancy. (2005). Office of the telecommunications ombudsman customer satisfaction 2005;
available at: http://www.ombudsman-services.org/downloads/CustomerSatisfactionSurvey2005.pdf
Craigforth Consultancy. (2006). Office of the telecommunications ombudsman customer satisfaction 2006
; available at: http://www.ombudsman-services.org/downloads/Customer_Satisfaction_Survey%20otelo2006.pdf
Craigforth Consultancy. (2007). Office of the telecommunications ombudsman customer satisfaction 2007
; available at: http://www.ombudsmanservices.org/downloads/Customer%20research%20ReportJune2007.pdf
Craigforth Consultancy. (2008). The ombudsman service limited office of the telecommunications ombudsman customer satisfaction
; available at: http://www.ombudsman-services.org/downloads/FinalOtelo2008%20(3).pdf
Creutzfeldt, N. (2013). The evolution and origins of consumer dispute resolution systems in Europe. In C. Hodges & A. Stadler (Eds.), Resolving Mass Disputes: ADR and Settlement of Mass Claims. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar
Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis
. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35
, 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., & Cockran, L. (1979). Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45
, 268–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genn, H. (1993). Tribunals and informal justice. The Modern Law Review 56(3), 393–411.
Guinier, L. (1991). No two seats: The elusive quest for political equality, Virginia Law Review, 77, 1413.
Harrison, T., Hopeck, P., Desrayaud, N., & Imboden, K. I. (2013). The relationship between conflict, anticipatory procedural justice and design with intentions to use ombudsman processes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 24
, 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensler, D. R. (2004). Our courts ourselves: How the alternative dispute resolution movement is reshaping our legal system. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Hinde, J. (2010). DJS research ltd. office of the telecommunications ombudsman customer satisfaction 2010 July,
available at: http://www.ombudsman-services.org/downloads/CustomersurveyOtelo2010.pdf
Hinde, J. (2011). DJS research ltd ombudsman Services: Communications customer satisfaction 2011. A research report
available at: http://www.ombudsman-services.org/downloads/Communications%20Customer%20Sat%20Report%202011%20-%20DRAFT%2024.06.pdf
Hodges, C. (2012a). Consumer ADR in Europe. Zeitschrift für Konfliktmanagement, 6
, 195–197.Google Scholar
Hodges, C. (2012b). Current discussions on consumer redress: Collective redress and ADR. ERA Forum:, 13(1), 11–33.
Hodges, C., Benöhr, I., & Creutzfeldt-Banda, N. (2012a). Consumer ADR in Europe
. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Hodges, C., Benöhr, I., & Creutzfeldt-Banda, N. (2012b). (Introduction) Consumer ADR in Europe. Oxford: Hart, 29–30.
Hopt, K., & Steffek, F. (2012). Mediation: Principles and regulation in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackson, J., Huq, A. Z., Bradford, B., & Tyler, T. (2013). Monopolizing force? Police legitimacy and public attitudes toward the acceptability of violence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19
(4), 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, P. F., Stanczak, P., Vicari, F., & Sciallis,E. (2009). Cross-border dispute resolution mechanisms in Europe- practical reflections on the need and availability.
Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapenza, H, J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, Vol 38, No 1 60–84, p. 68.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M.S. Greenberg, & R. H. Weiss (Eds.), Social Exchange (pp. 27–55). New York: Springer.
Lind, E. (1982). The psychology of courtroom procedure. In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom. New York: Academic.
Lind, E. (1986). The court-annexed arbitration programme in north carolina. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M., & de vera Park, M. V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224–251.
Lind, E., & Tyler, T. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Pelnumm Press.
Lissak, R., & Sheppard, B. (1983). Beyond fairness: The criterion problem in research on dispute intervention. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 45–63.
McEven, C., & Maiman, R. (1984). Mediation in small claims court: Achieving compliance through consent. Law Society Review, 18, 11–49.
McEwen, C., & Maiman, R. (1987). Small claims mediation in Maine: An empirical assessment. Maine Law Review, 33, 237–268.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1983). Legal negotiation: A study of strategies in search of a theory. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 8(4), 905–937.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1984). Toward another view of legal negotiation: The structure of problem solving. University of California Law Review, 31, 754–842.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1991). Pursuing settlement in an adversary culture: A tale of innovation co-opted or "The Law of ADR”. Florida State University Law Review, 19, 1–46.
Michelman, F. (1977). Formal and associational aims in procedural due process. In J. Pennock & J. Chapman (Eds), Due Process: Nomos XVIII. New York: New York University Press.
OFT. (2010). Mapping UK consumer redress: A summary guide to dispute resolution systems.
Available at: http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/general_policy/OFT1267.pdf
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Bachman, R., & Sherman, L. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & society Review, 31, 163–204.
Pruitt, D., Peirce, R., McGillicuddly, N., Welton, G., & Castrianno, L. (1993). Long term success in mediation. Law and Human Behavior, 17
(3), 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. London: Oxford University Press.
Seneviratne, M. (2002). Ombudsmen public services and administrative justice. Butterworks: Lexis Nexis.
Shetovski, D. (2004). Procedural preferences in alternative dispute resolution. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10
(3), 211–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silbey, S., & Merry, S. (1986). Mediator settlement strategies. Law and Policy, 8
, 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solum, L. (2004). Procedural justice.
Public law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series no. 04–02. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=508282
, 54 ff.
Stipanowich, T. J. (2004). ADR and the “Vanishing trial”: The growth and impact of “alternative dispute resolution”. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1(3), 843–912.
Stuyck, J., Terryn, E., Colaert, V., Van Dyck,T., Peretz, N., Hoekx, N., & Tereszkiewicz P. (2007). Study on alternative means of consumer redress other than redress through ordinary judicial proceedings. Catholic University of Leuven
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tyler, T. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendant’s evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law & Society Review 18, 51–74.
Tyler, T. (1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law & Society Review, 22
, 301–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. (1996). The relationship of the outcome and procedural fairness: How does knowing the outcome influence judgments about the procedure? Social Justice Research, 9(4), 311–325.
Tyler, T. (1997). Compliance with Intellectual Property Laws: A psychological perspective, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 29, 219–236.
Tyler, T. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. In M. H. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 431–505). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). What do they expect? New findings confirm the precepts of procedural fairness. California Court Review, Winter 2006, 22–24.
Tyler, T. (2011). Mechanisms of legal effect: Theories of procedural justice; A methods monograph for the public health law research programme Temple University Beasley School of Law 2011
available at: http://publichealthlawresearch.org/methods-guide-type/monograph/method-guide/mechanisms-legal-effect-theories-procedural-justice
Tyler, T., Boeckmann, R., Smith, H., & Huo, Y. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Westview Press, 75–76.
Tyler, T. & Caine, A. (1981). The Influence of outcome and procedures on satisfaction with formal Leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642–655.
Tyler, T., & Folger, R. (1980). Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters in Basic Applied Psychology, 1, 281–292.
Tyler, T., & Lind, E. (1986). Procedural processes and legal institutions. Paper presented at the International Conference on Social Justice in Human Relations
. The Netherlands: University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Tyler, T., Rasinski, K., & Spodick, N. (1985). Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72–81.
Tyler, Tom R, and Yuen J Huo. (2002) Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Vidmar, N. (1981). Justice motives and other psychological factors in the development and resolution of disputes. In M. Lerner & S. W. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behaviour. New York: Plenum Press.
Vidmar, N. (1991). The origins and consequences of procedural fairness [Review of Lind, A. & Tyler, T. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum, 1988]. Law & Social Inquiry, 15(4), 877–892.
Walker, L., & Lind, E. (1984). Psychological studies of procedural justice. In G. M. Stephenson & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology
(Vol. 2, pp. 293–313). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). NewYork: Sage.