Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 179–196

Attitudinal, Self-Efficacy, and Social Norms Determinants of Young Consumers’ Propensity to Overspend on Credit Cards

Original paper

Abstract

Research in marketing related to credit card behavior has generally found that overspending and credit card debt depend on the individual’s attitude toward spending on credit or a lack of behavioral control. The individual’s social environment has received much less attention and is presumed to have very little effect, if any. In the present study, the propensity of young individuals to overspend on their credit cards is examined as a function of attitude, self-efficacy, and social norms. A survey was conducted among a sample of 225 young adult consumers (i.e., college business students) who provided measures of attitude, self-efficacy, and social norms related to overspending on credit cards. The findings revealed that social norms that are descriptive and specific to credit card overspending have a statistically significant impact on an individual’s propensity to overspend on credit cards whereas attitude toward credit card overspending does not. They also show that the extent to which young consumers perceive a sense of behavioral control towards overspending on credit cards is a significant factor to consider. Theoretical and managerial implications of these findings as well as opportunities for further research are discussed.

Keywords

Overspending on credit cards Attitude Self-efficacy Social norms Young consumers 

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1992). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations (Rev.). Available from http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf
  4. Ajzen, I., & Gilbert-Cote, N. (2008). Attitude and the prediction of behavior. In W. D. Crano & R. Prislin (Eds.), Attitude and attitude change (pp. 289–312). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ajzen, I., Timco, C., & White, J. B. (1982). Self-monitoring and the attitude–behavior relation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 426–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Albaracin, D., Johnson, B. T., Fishbein, M., & Muellerleile, P. A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 142–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (1999). Distinguishing perceptions of control from self-efficacy: Predicting consumption of a low-fat diet using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. The American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berger, L. M., Collins, J. M., & Cuesta, L. (2013). Household debt and adult depressive symptoms. Retrieved on January 15. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2200927 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.2200927
  12. Bernstein, V., Hakel, M. D., & Harlan, A. (1975). The college student as interviewer: A threat to generalizability? Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 266–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Borden, L. M., Lee, S. A., Serido, J., & Collins, D. (2008). Changing college students’ financial knowledge, attitudes, and behavior through seminar participation. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, H., & Volpe, R. P. (1998). An analysis of personal financial literacy among college students. Financial Services Review, 7(2), 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chien, Y., & Devaney, S. A. (2001). The effects of credit attitude and socioeconomic factors on credit card and installment debt. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 162–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  17. Cialdini, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). Theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026.Google Scholar
  18. Davies, E., & Lea, S. E. G. (1995). Student attitudes to student debt. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(1), 663–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans, D., & Schmalensee, R. (2000). Paying with plastic: The digital revolution in buying and borrowing. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  21. Farley, J. U., Lehmann, D. R., & Ryan, M. R. (1981). Generalizing from ‘imperfect’ replications. Journal of Business, 54, 597–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feinberg, R. A. (1986). Credit card as spending facilitating stimuli: A conditioning Interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(3), 348–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  24. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., Blanton, H., & Russell, D. W. (1998). Reasoned action and social reaction: Willingness and intention as independent predictors of health risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1164–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2011). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Hayhoe, C. R., Leach, L. J., Turner, P. R., Bruin, M. J., & Lawrence, F. C. (2000). Differences in spending habits and credit use of college students. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 34(1), 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hirschman, E. (1982). Consumer payment systems: The relationship of attribute structure to preference and usage. Journal of Business, 55(4), 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacoby, J., & Landes, J. (2009). House of cards: An in-depth look at the housing bust that has upended the American dream. CNBC Special Reports. New York, NY: MSNBC. Available from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29163182/ns/business-cnbc_tv/t/cnbc-specialreport-house-cards/
  30. Jamshidi, D., & Hussin, N. (2012). A conceptual framework for adoption of Islamic credit card in Malaysia. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 2(3), 102–110.Google Scholar
  31. Khare, A., Khare, A., & Singh, S. (2012). Factors affecting credit card use in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 24(2), 236–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lachance, M. J., Beaudoin, P., & Robitaille, J. (2006). Quebec young adults’ use of and knowledge of credit. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(4), 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. K. (1992). Predicting personal debt and debt repayment: Psychological, social and economic determinants. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(1), 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lyons, A. C. (2004). A profile of financially at-risk college students. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 38(1), 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lyons, A. C. (2008). Risky credit card behavior of college students. In J. J. Xiao (Ed.), Handbook of consumer finance research (pp. 185–207). New York: Springer Science Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lyons, A. C., Palmer, L., Jayaratne, K. S. U., & Scherpf, E. (2006). Are we making the grade? A national overview of financial education and program evaluation. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 4(2), 208–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Manning, R. D. (2000). Credit nation: The consequences of America’s addiction to credit. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  38. Manstead, A. S. R., & van Eekelen, S. A. M. (1998). Distinguishing between perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy in the domain of academic intentions and behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1375–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pempek, T., Yermolayeva, Y., & Calvert, S. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pinto, M. B., Parente, D. H., & Palmer, T. S. (2001). College student performance and credit card usage. Journal of College Student Development, 42(1), 49–58.Google Scholar
  41. Prelec, D., & Simester, D. (2001). Always leave home without it: A further investigation of the credit card effect on willingness to pay. Marketing Letters, 12(1), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rimal, R., & Real, K. (2005). How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms. Communication Research, 32(3), 389–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roberts, J. A., & Jones, E. (2001). Money attitudes, credit card use, and compulsive buying among American college students. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(2), 213–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. SallieMae (2009). How undergraduate students use credit cards. Wilkes Barre, PA: Author. Available from https//:www1.salliemae.com/about/news_info/newsreleases/041309.htm
  45. Sharpe, D. L., Yao, R., & Liao, L. (2012). Correlates of credit card adoption in urban China. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33(2), 156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Soman, D. (2001). Effect of payment mechanism on spending behavior: The Role of rehearsal and immediacy of payments. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 460–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Soman, D., & Cheema, A. (2002). The effect of credit on spending decisions: The role of credit limit and credibility. Marketing Science, 21(1), 32–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sorkin, A. R. (2009). Too big to fail. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  50. Sotiropoulos, V., & d’Astous, A. (2012). Social networks and credit card overspending among young adult consumers. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 46(3), 457–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Starobin, S. S., Hagedorna, S. L., Purnamasaria, A., & Chen, Y. (2013). Examining financial literacy among transfer and nontransfer students: Predicting financial well-being and academic success at a four-year university. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 37(3), 216–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Synodinos, N. E. (1990). Environmental attitudes and knowledge: A comparison of marketing and business students with other groups. Journal of Business Research, 20(2), 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Terry, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8), 776–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tokunaga, H. (1993). The use and abuse of consumer credit: Application of psychological theory and research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14(2), 285–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Trafinow, D., & Finlay, K. (1996). The importance of subjective norms for a minority of people: Between-subjects and within-subjects analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8), 820–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). State and county quickfact. Consolidated Federal Funds Report. Available from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html
  57. U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Fall enrollment survey. National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. Available from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/projections/projections2018/tables/table_10.asp
  58. Wang, J., & Xiao, J. J. (2009). Buying behavior, social support and credit card indebtedness of college students. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(1), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang, L., Lu, W., & Malhotra, N. K. (2011). Demographic, attitude, personality and credit card features correlated with credit card debt: A view from China. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wiley, C., & Sisson, M. (2006). Ethics, accuracy and assumption: The use of Facebook by students and employers. Paper presented at the Southwestern Ohio Council for Higher Education Special Topics Forum, Dayton, OHGoogle Scholar
  61. Xiao, J. J., Tang, C., Serido, J., & Shim, S. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of risky credit behavior among college students: Applications and extensions of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 30(2), 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yam, B. L., Bruce, A. H., & Xu, B. (2012). Are college students at greater risk of credit card abuse? Age, gender, materialism and parental influence on consumer response to credit cards. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 17(2), 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ybarra, O., & Trafimow, D. (1998). How priming the private self or collective self affects the relative weights of attitudes and subjective norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 362–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementNew York Institute of TechnologyNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.MontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations